| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Paul Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a General Discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: That he readily admits committing the offense for which he was court-martialed and sentenced to receive a BCD; there is no error. He seeks an upgrade based on clemency and the injustice of suffering an overly harsh punishment for 28 years. He states that he has been a productive, law-abiding citizen since his separation from the Army. He also states that much of his service prior to the offense for which he was separated was good, and he explains that he went AWOL (absent without leave) because his wife was pregnant and needed him and his company commander would not authorize leave.
In support of his application, the applicant, a custodian at a public school, submits: numerous letters of support from the principal and staff of his school; a letter from a properties management company to which he provides janitorial services; and a copy of his Record of Trial (ROT).
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel supports the applicant's request for upgrade based on the applicant's statement that his record was free of any misconduct up to the point of his being AWOL. In addition, the applicant has maintained steady employment over the years and is a respected and contributing member of his community.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 6 September 1972, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for a period of 2 years. He successfully completed basic combat training.
On 5 April 1973, the applicant, while still undergoing advanced individual training, was convicted by a Special Court-Martial for being AWOL from 5 February 1973 through 16 March 1973. His sentence included forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months.
The applicant successfully completed advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A10, Field Artillery Basic. He subsequently was reassigned to Fort Hood, Texas with duty as an artilleryman in Battery D, 1st Battalion, 6th Field Artillery, 1st Cavalry Division.
On 15 October 1973, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code Military Justice, for being AWOL from 0700-1400 hours on 4 September 1973. Punishment included forfeiture of $50.00, suspended for 60 days, and 14 days of extra duty.
On 11 June 1974, a separation physical found the applicant qualified for separation.
On 16 July 1974, the applicant was convicted by a Special Court-Martial for being AWOL from 7 January through 17 May 1974. His sentence included a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 2 months, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months, and reduction to pay grade E-1. On 13 September 1974, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the sentence. Subsequently, on 21 October 1974, that portion of the sentence dealing with the forfeiture of pay was remitted.
On 4 November 1974, the applicant was separated with a BCD pursuant to his sentence by a special court-martial. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was credited with 1 year, 6 months, and 25 days of active Federal service and he had 220 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11 provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board carefully reviewed all of the applicant's entire record. The applicant's contention that much of his service was good is without merit. It was noted that he had 2 prior disciplinary actions (a special court-martial and an NJP) for the same offense of AWOL.
2. The Board accepts that the applicant may have had marital/family problems; however, there were other avenues [his chain of command or his chaplain] available to him through which he could have sought assistance. He did not have to resort to going AWOL and his wife's pregnancy did not excuse the offense.
3. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant's good post-service conduct, this factor is not so meritorious as to warrant the relief requested.
4. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed by the court-martial. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board finds no reason for clemency.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jns___ __dph___ __wdp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002070194 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020912 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19741104 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, Chap 3. . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A68.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 105.0100 |
| 2. | 144.0047 |
| 3. | 144.6800 |
| 4. | 144.7100 |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011179C070205
He was transferred to the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to serve his confinement. Nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for that offense. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013489
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 20 January 1975, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060810C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was convicted of disrespect, disobedience, and failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 8 and 14 July 1975, and sentenced to reduction to private/E-1, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 6 months, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and a BCD. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007413
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007413 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. United States Army Court of Military Review, dated 29 July 1976, shows that the findings of guilty were affirmed but the court affirmed only so much of the approved sentence as provides for a bad conduct discharge and confinement for 30 days. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103987C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. Evidence of record indicates the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board in 2004, which was past that board's 15-year statute of limitation. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008604C071113
On 22 September 1976, the convening authority approved the sentence and the record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by the Army Court of Military Review. On 14 March 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. There is no credible evidence in the applicant’s record, nor has he presented any evidence, to warrant the requested relief based on error or injustice in the court-martial process.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000625C070206
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Although the applicant contends that his record of nonjudicial punishments indicate only minor offenses, evidence of record shows nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him on six occasions for various infractions which include larceny and assault. The applicant’s record of service included six nonjudicial punishments, two special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081070C070215
On 12 July 1955, the applicant was found guilty by a General Court-Martial for being AWOL from 23 April to 2 May 1955, and for being AWOL from 18 May to 1 June 1955. While trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged, and his conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, the possibility that the applicant suffered from PTSD, his 20 months of honorable service, and his combat service must also be considered in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051836C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant’s SPCM conviction and the resultant BCD were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010727C080407
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 7 May 1973, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The evidence of record does show that he departed AWOL from his unit while still in training without ever attempting to discuss his situation with members of his chain of command.