| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that it was a mistake to court-martial him for offenses that could have been handled at the unit/company level. He believes his court-martial was unjust and the punishment too harsh for the misconduct committed.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 October 1972 for a period of 3 years. He enlisted for the United States Army Station of Choice Enlistment Option - Europe and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Food Service Specialist). Following completion of all military training, he was awarded MOS 94B and was assigned to Germany.
The applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from his place of duty on 7 November 1973 (0530-0610) and 10 November 1973 (0530-1105). On 13 November 1973, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for these offenses. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $88.00 pay (suspended) and 7 days' extra duty.
On 25 March 1974, the applicant accepted NJP for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed placed of duty (guard mount), being disrespectful in language toward a noncommissioned officer (NCO), and for wrongfully communicating a threat to an NCO. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $88.00 pay.
On 8 June 1974, the applicant accepted NJP for twice failing to go to his appointed place of duty (mess hall) at the time prescribed. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $88.00 pay.
On 20 March 1975, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial at Bad Kreuznach, Germany, of unlawfully striking a commissioned officer and being drunk and disorderly in the hallway and parking lot adjacent to the NCO club. He was sentenced to reduction in rank to private first class/E-3, restriction for 2 months, and forfeiture of $280.00 pay per month for 2 months. The sentence was approved on 4 April 1975.
The applicant was AWOL from his unit from 16- 25 June 1975. On 8 and 10 July 1975, he failed to go to his appointed place of duty, the Mess Hall. On 14 July 1975, he behaved with disrespect toward a commissioned officer and failed to get out of bed and report for duty in the Mess Hall as ordered by that officer.
On 12 September 1975 at Baumholder, Germany, the applicant was tried for the above offenses by a special court-martial. He was convicted of disrespect, disobedience, and failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 8 and 14 July 1975, and sentenced to reduction to private/E-1, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 6 months, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and a BCD. The sentence was adjudged on 12 September 1975 and approved on 4 November 1975, except for the BCD.
On 18 May 1976, appellate review of the applicant's conviction was completed and the sentence was affirmed. The BCD was ordered executed.
On 25 May 1976, the applicant was discharged after completing 3 years, 4 months, and 11 days of active military service and accruing 85 days of lost time.
There is no indication in the available records that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, of that regulation, in effect at the time, provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of personnel with punitive discharges. It provided that a soldier would be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence to a general court-martial or special court-martial. The appellate review process must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions that his court-martial was too harsh and should have been handled at the unit/company level. The Board also noted that the applicant was given three opportunities to correct his behavior through NJP at the company level; however, for whatever reason, he chose not to do so.
3. The Board also noted that the applicant had previously been convicted by a special court-martial for striking an officer and being drunk and disorderly.
4. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_KAK___ __REB___ __TEO__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001060810 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011211 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19760525 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, c11 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Director |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.9405 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024903
The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge or change his character of service to uncharacterized. His service record is void of evidence that indicates he was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia or that he underwent a psychiatric evaluation while on active duty. Although the applicant contends that his misconduct was due to paranoid schizophrenia, his service record is void of evidence indicating he was diagnosed with this mental condition...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080266C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, the applicant states that he did not receive a rehabilitative transfer after his 1970 court-martial conviction. On 17 February 1976 the Army Discharge Review Board, in a majority opinion, denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002873C071029
The resulting approved sentence was a BCD. Given his undistinguished record of service and the severity of the offenses for which he was convicted, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support clemency in this case. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005550C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016226
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded. In his request for discharge, the applicant acknowledged he understood that if the discharge request was approved, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was considered appropriate at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063281C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's available military records show: On 27 March 1963, the United States Court of Military Appeals denied the applicant’s Petition for Grant of Review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002224
The applicants military personnel records contain a copy of Headquarters, Presidio of San Francisco, California, Special Court-Martial Order Number 324, dated 18 December 1964. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant served in Vietnam at any time during his military service. The evidence of record also shows that the DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 April 1961 documents this period of the applicants honorable active duty service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019421
Special Court-Martial Order Number 28, dated 11 February 1983, issued by the U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, shows the applicant's conviction and sentence were affirmed and the convening authority ordered his bad conduct discharge executed. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. His conviction, confinement, and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006942
On 21 February 1963, the applicants company commander recommended the applicants separation from that military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. On 18 April 1963, the lieutenant colonel serving as Commander, 38th Transportation Battalion (Germany), recommended approval of the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and that the applicant be given an undesirable discharge. The applicants DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080006942
On 21 February 1963, the applicants company commander recommended the applicants separation from that military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. On 18 April 1963, the lieutenant colonel serving as Commander, 38th Transportation Battalion (Germany), recommended approval of the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and that the applicant be given an undesirable discharge. The applicants DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States...