Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070192C070402
Original file (2002070192C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070192

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: That he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for an injury incurred on 7 August 1969 in Vietnam. He contends that doctor progress notes at the 6th Convalescent Center in Cam Ranh Bay should reflect this injury.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted on 16 June 1955 and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments. He served as a clinical specialist in Vietnam from
29 June 1969 through 28 June 1970. The applicant completed over 20 years of active duty and retired in the rank of sergeant first class on 31 August 1975.

The applicant’s DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), which were authenticated in his own hand, do not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action.

His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank.

The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

The historical files of the 8th Field Hospital and the 6th Convalescent Center located at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland, failed to identify the applicant as being entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

There are no medical records in the available records.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for an injury incurred on 7 August 1969 in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record to support this contention.
2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JL_____ MVT_____ RTD_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070192
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021017
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004548

    Original file (20090004548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 30 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004548 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster; and there are no orders in the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065605C070421

    Original file (2001065605C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that his records do not reflect a stab wound he received in Vietnam, for which he should have been awarded a Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the AGCM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009180

    Original file (20120009180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing, his DA Form 20 does not indicate he received a combat-related wound, and his records do not contain orders for the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002451

    Original file (20110002451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends his medical record should be corrected to delete the reference to "old injury" and he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was wounded while serving in the RVN when he sustained a perforated tympanic membrane of his right ear from a loud explosion. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071274C070402

    Original file (2002071274C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart, physical disability retirement or separation, and deletion of the AWOL entry in his records. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s enlisted qualification record does not show that he was wounded in action, nor does it show award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091256C070212

    Original file (2003091256C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 20 April 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 19 April 1973. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006381

    Original file (20110006381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded in Vietnam and never received the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence in the applicant's available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action during his active service and his records do not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he received a wound/injury as a result of hostile action or that he was treated by medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010388

    Original file (20110010388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam and he feels it should be listed on his DD Form 214. This was markedly aggravated by a fall on the left shoulder subsequent to a bullet wound injury involving the right and left lower legs while engaged in combat in RVN. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072243C070403

    Original file (2002072243C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These awards are not shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 and will be administratively corrected.Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, the Board determined that this medical report is not sufficient as a basis for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086803C070212

    Original file (2003086803C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal...