Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065605C070421
Original file (2001065605C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 11 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065605


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his records do not reflect a stab wound he received in Vietnam, for which he should have been awarded a Purple Heart.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Detroit, Michigan on 15 January 1965, for a period of 3 years and training as a supply specialist.

5. On 7 July 1966, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit, the 551st Light Maintenance Company. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 19 May 1967.

6. On 1 July 1967, the applicant was involved in a fight with a Vietnamese citizen in Bien Hoa, Republic of Vietnam, and was stabbed in the right calf. He was initially treated at the 93rd Evacuation Hospital and was subsequently transferred to the 6th Convalescent Center on 9 July 1967. There is no indication in the available records to show that a line of duty determination was made in his case.

7. He departed Vietnam on 18 October 1967, for Oakland Army Base, California, and was honorably released from active duty on 19 October 1967, as an overseas returnee serving in the pay grade of E-3. He had served 2 years, 9 months and 5 days of total active service and his report of separation (DD Form 214) shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

8. A review of his records fails to show that his injury was ever classified as a wound incurred in combat or that he was ever awarded the Purple Heart.

9. On 20 November 2001, the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, authorized the issuance of an Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) to the applicant. However, there is no indication in the available records to show that the AGCM was ever entered on his DD Form 214.

10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.






CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. While the evidence shows that his wounds/injuries were treated by medical personnel and made a matter of official record, all indications are that he was stabbed while engaged in an altercation downtown. Accordingly, he does not meet the criteria to be awarded the Purple Heart.

2. However, the applicant was awarded the AGCM and is entitled to have that award annotated on his DD Form 214.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the AGCM.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

___rtd___ ___mkp _ ___eja __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Margaret K. Patterson___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065605
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/04/11
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102 107.0056/AGCM
2. 61 107.0015/PH
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088872C070403

    Original file (2003088872C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) has no orders or other documents on file that show he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Further, lacking any derogatory information on file or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062695C070421

    Original file (2001062695C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to award the PH a member must have been wounded in action, must have been treated for the wound by military medical personnel, and this treatment must have made a matter of official record. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was twice treated by military medical personnel for wounds received in action against the enemy in the RVN. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004838C070206

    Original file (20050004838C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. correcting his DD Form 214 to delete: Vietnam Service Medal and Expert (Rifle M14); and b. correcting his DD Form 214 to add:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003488

    Original file (20090003488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 5 December 1967 to on or about 26 November 1968. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment or that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076701C070215

    Original file (2002076701C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 1 year, 11 months and 11 days of total active service and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. A review of his records, to include his separation medical examination, fails to show that he was ever treated for any wounds or injuries incurred as a result of enemy action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004640C070205

    Original file (20060004640C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no general orders in the available records which show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of records show that the applicant was assigned to a unit that participated in two campaigns.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087327C070212

    Original file (2003087327C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH at this time. Lacking any derogatory information on file and/or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, which would preclude him from receiving the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant served a qualifying period of service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070406C070402

    Original file (2002070406C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received a shrapnel wound during that ambush which was treated by the unit’s medic. He served in Vietnam from 20 August 1966 to 19 August 1967. The applicant’s records do not contain any evidence of any disciplinary action being taken against him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066176C070421

    Original file (2001066176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant’s records fails to show any indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured or ever treated for any such wounds/injuries while on active duty. The available evidence of record found in this case fails to indicate that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, that he was treated by medical personnel, and that such treatment was made a matter of official record. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088882C070403

    Original file (2003088882C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty in the Army on 8 May 1967. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The Board considered the applicant’s claim that Iwo Jima took place before he was born and that he never saw a skylight while he was serving in the RVN, which proves that were errors in the medical treatment record and as a result he should receive the PH.