Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Chairperson | |
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern | Member | |
Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Air Medal (AM), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and an oak leaf cluster to his Purple Heart (PH).
APPLICANT STATES: He was entitled to the AM due to his participation in 100 or more combat assaults. He was entitled to the BSM for his actions when two of his comrades were killed in action. He was entitled to an oak leaf cluster to his PH for wounds incurred when a “frag” was thrown back at him during practice.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted and entered on active duty on 21 September 1967. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman, served in Vietnam from 2 March 1968 to 23 February 1969 and was promoted to the rank of sergeant. He was assigned to a cavalry squadron while serving in Vietnam.
The applicant’s DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, item 38, Record of Assignments, shows that the applicant was a patient twice while in Vietnam, the first time on 28 June 1968 and the second time on 12 July 1968. Item 40 of this form, Wounds, has “GSW L. upper quadrant,” with 28 June 1968 entered as the date the wound was inflicted upon the applicant. There are no other entries in that item.
The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 30 September 1969 at the expiration of his term of service. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, shows the applicant was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Expert (Rifle), the Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960, the PH, and the Army Commendation Medal.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made
Army Pamphlet 672-3 (unit citation and campaign register) indicates that all Army units serving in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 are authorized the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with palm. That publication also shows the pertinent identified campaign periods, for which a bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal are as follows: Tet Counteroffensive ended on 1 April 1968, Counteroffensive Phase IV ended on 30 June 1968, Counteroffensive Phase V ended 1 July 1968, Counteroffensive Phase VI ended on 22 February 1969, and Tet 69 Counteroffensive ended on 8 June 1969. In addition, this pamphlet shows that the applicant's unit, Company C, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry, was awarded the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for actions against the enemy on 27, 28 and 29 June 1968.
The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the armed forces who served in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace during the period 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Service on temporary duty must have been for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days. Campaigns credited to a soldier are reflected by service stars to the Vietnam Service Medal (a bronze service star for each campaign, a silver service star for five campaigns).
This regulation also provides that the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism, for meritorious achievement (single acts of a lesser degree than which required for the Distinguished Flying Cross) and for meritorious service (sustained distinction in the performance of duties). In this regard, accumulation of a specified number of hours and missions will not serve as the basis for award of the Air Medal. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. Arabic numerals are now used instead of oak leaf clusters for the second and succeeding awards.
This regulation defines the criteria for award of the PH as a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
In the processing of this case the staff of the Board reviewed the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The applicant's name was only entered on that roster for his 28 June 1968 wound.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence that the applicant was ever recommended for the BSM. As such, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of that decoration to the applicant.
2. Likewise, while the applicant was in a cavalry squadron, there is no evidence that he participated in air assaults. Without evidence of air assault participation, there is insufficient evidence to award him the AM.
3. As for the oak leaf cluster to his PH, while the applicant was hospitalized twice while in Vietnam, there is no indication why he was hospitalized the second time. Without evidence that he was wounded as the result of hostile action, there is insufficient basis on which to award him the oak leaf cluster to his PH.
4. However, the applicant served in Vietnam during five campaigns and therefore should have been awarded a silver service star to his Vietnam Service Medal instead of one bronze service star. He was also entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and the VUA. However, these awards are administrative in nature and do not require the authority of the Board to be added to the applicant's DD Form 214.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
NOTE: The Army Review Boards Agency, St. Louis, Missouri, will be requested to replace the bronze service star with a silver service star to the applicant's Vietnam Service Medal, and to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and the VUA.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ela____ ____kah__ ___tbr__ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002069915 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20020917 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010066
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943
Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005956
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Official orders on file announcing his award of the BSM w/"V" Device confirm the applicant was wounded in action while serving in the RVN on 29 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 29 June...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023343
The applicant's military records show he served in the Regular Army as an enlisted Soldier from 16 November 1965 to 8 April 1968. The applicant's official military personnel file does not contain orders for the PH, a second BSM, or additional awards of the AM. Since award of the PH requires the wound to be treated by a medical officer and there is no evidence the applicant received such treatment, there is insufficient basis in which to award him the PH.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357
The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010567C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he received a PH for being wounded in action in January 1968, which is included in his record and on his separation document (DD Form 214), but did not receive a second PH for an incident that occurred on 19 September 1967, when he was flying a helicopter gunship in the An Loc valley in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027
The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016615
This publication shows that the 101st Airborne Division Artillery and the 377th Artillery, during the time of the applicant's assignment, were respectfully cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated in 1970; and in DAGO Number 48, dated in 1971; for awards of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015065
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 7 May 1970, be corrected to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006074
There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award. Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in 6 campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the "Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster)" from the DD Form 214 and adding the "Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster);" b. deleting the "BSM with "V"...