Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069573C070402
Original file (2002069573C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 24 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069573

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any)


2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was recently told that his unit was awarded the ASUA and he would like his records corrected to show this award.

4. The applicant's military records show that he entered active duty on 20 January 1983. He completed basic combat training, advanced individual training, and was assigned as a military policeman (MP) with the 1st MP Company at Ft. Riley, Kansas on 7 May 1983. He was reassigned to A Company, in November 1985, and again reassigned for training as a dog handler in January 1986. Upon completion of training he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Miesau Army Depot (MIAD), Germany on 24 April 1986. The highest rank he held was specialist (SP4) (E-4).

5. On 17 July 1987, the applicant was discharged under Army Regulations 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct, with a general discharge. He had 4 years, 5 months, and 28 days of creditable service with no lost time. His awards and decorations are shown as the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Badge with Rifle, Grenade and Grenade Launcher Bars, and the Marksman Badge with Pistol Bar.

6. A review of the listing of units that received the ASUA shows that 1st MP Company, Ft. Riley, Kansas, received the ASUA for the period of 27 December 1984 through 22 March 1985.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). The ASUA, created in February 1985, is awarded for outstanding meritorious performance of a difficult and challenging mission under extraordinary circumstances during peacetime. The criteria for award also requires that the unit display such outstanding devotion and superior performance so as to set it apart and above other units with similar missions, defines peacetime as any period where wartime awards were not authorized in the geographic area in which the mission was executed, precludes award for purely humanitarian operations, and precludes award if the act has been recognized by another unit award.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Although the requested award was not created or awarded until after the applicant had been reassigned, he had served in the 1st MP Company during the period for which the unit was authorized the award. He is therefore entitled to this award.

2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below will correct an error.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award.


BOARD VOTE:


__RVO___ ___KAH_ __BJE__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _ Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.__
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069573
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021024
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION grant
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0035
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016635

    Original file (20090016635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Therefore, the applicant is entitled to permanent award of the ASUA and correction of his records to show this award. Evidence shows the applicant received three Army Achievement Medals during his tenure on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025115

    Original file (20100025115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant states he read an article stating that his unit, the 300th Military Police (MP) Company was awarded the ASUA in 1971 when he served with the unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087552C070212

    Original file (2003087552C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, evidence of record shows the applicant’s unit was not awarded the ASUA while he was assigned to it.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083530C070215

    Original file (2002083530C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his date of birth as 17 March 1971 not 29 February 1972. He requests that the DD Form 214 reflect his service in Guantanamo, Cuba, and his award of the Drivers/Mechanics Qualification Badge, the Army Superior Unit Award and two Certificates of Achievement, dated 7 March 1995 and, 1October 1996 respectively. Therefore, the Board finds that the certificates should not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000119

    Original file (20140000119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded: * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * A second Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM) * Two Army Superior Unit Awards (ASUA) 2. A certificate for award of the ASUA with a listing of participating units shows the Special Operations Command Communications Element 020, Company B, 1st Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne) was awarded the ASUA for this period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017466

    Original file (20110017466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a fourth award of the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). Without these ASUA orders, it cannot be determined if the permanent orders provided by the applicant are, in fact, a fourth award of the ASUA. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024582

    Original file (20110024582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the AAM while assigned to the 147th Maintenance Company (Forward) as a member of Task Force 6-52 ADA from 8 January 1996 to 28 February 1996. His award of the AAM verifies he was assigned to the 6th Battalion, 52nd ADA, for more than 30 days during the period the unit was cited for the ASUA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Superior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064639C070421

    Original file (2001064639C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his second award of the ASUA was authorized retroactively after his retirement. The applicant’s retirement DD Form 214 shows one award of the ASUA as an authorized award. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the ASUA on 16 January 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020891

    Original file (20140020891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the ASUA was awarded 3 years after his retirement. The applicant provides copies of – * deployment orders * his DD Form 214, dated 27 February 2006 * Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) General Orders Number 2009-24, dated 10 December 2009 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Superior Unit Award to his DD Form 214 dated 27 February 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015408

    Original file (20140015408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). A DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 29 April 1991, shows he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service during the period 1 February through 1 April 1991, in support of Operation Desert Storm while assigned to the WRAMC. The applicant was in a TDY status with this unit during the period they were awarded the...