| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he declined to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that he be refunded all premiums paid into the program.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was in the first group to be offered the SBP but the installation did not have the right forms so they were going to use the old form they had for the Retired Servicemen’s Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). He never wanted SBP as he stated at that time and as he has done so on many occasions since. A check of his retirement orders and a check of the forms of others who retired at the same time would reveal that they, too, did not have the proper form. He has tried many times over the years to get this settled once and for all, to no avail. He provides no supporting evidence.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
After having had prior service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 26 May 1959. He retired on 1 November 1972. An SBP election certificate or other form indicating he declined to participate in the SBP is not on file in his records. His Data for Retired Pay, DA Form 3713, indicates he did not make an election of options under the RSFPP.
Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The RSFPP was not automatically converted to the SBP. A member must take positive action to decline participation in the SBP. A failure to do so defaults to automatic spouse coverage, full base amount.
Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP. Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.
Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, provided that, effective 1 October 2008, no premiums will be withheld for a category of beneficiary, at a level of coverage after the later of: (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is reduced; and (2) the month during which the participant attains age 70.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board does not dispute the applicant’s contention that his installation did not have the correct SBP enrollment forms at the time he retired. The Board also does not dispute the fact that his DA Form 3713 shows that he had not enrolled in the RSFPP but this fact is immaterial since an RSFPP election did not convert into an SBP election.
2. The applicant has provided no evidence to show he attempted to disenroll from the SBP prior to the date of his current application. It appears that he was automatically enrolled in the SBP when the Army Finance Office did not receive a declination to participate. He should have realized, at least from his annual Retiree Pay Statements, that SBP premiums were being deducted. He contends that he tried over the years to get this settled but has provided no documentation to show what attempts were made. He had a one-year opportunity (May 1998 through May 1999) to disenroll, after which he could have continued attempts to obtain retroactive relief. Again, however, he provides no evidence to show that he attempted to do so.
3. The applicant’s eligible beneficiaries have had SBP protection for almost 30 years. There is insufficient evidence to show that it would be equitable at this date to grant the relief requested.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __wtm___ __cjp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069386 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020502 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.03 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062864C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he declined to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that all premiums deducted from his retired pay, plus interest, be refunded to him. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He contends in his application that he did not sign an authorization to deduct SBP premiums from his retired pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017320
The applicant, as the son of a service member (SM), requests that his fathers military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage. The SM attempted to revoke his RSFPP election in 1961. The SM had a 1-year option from 17 May 1998 to 18 May 1999 to terminate his participation in the SBP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091002C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he withdrew from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) due to being rated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) at 100 percent disabled. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1452(g)(1) provides that a person who has elected to participate in the SBP and who is suffering from a service-connected disability rated by the VA as totally disabling and has suffered from such...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019285
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140019285 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 March 2014, the retirement service office (RSO) at Fort Knox dispatched a certified letter by mail to the applicants spouse along with a Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement and instructions to complete and return it no later than 1 September 2014. The statement provided by the applicants spouse indicates he returned the Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement in April 2014...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792
Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077690C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). An election to provide an annuity of one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of the member's retired pay had to be made before the end of the 18th year of service. Records at DFAS-CL show that he failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972 and there is no evidence to show he attempted to enroll during a subsequent Open...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002140
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002140 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This letter further informed her that: a. she was entitled to participate in the RCSBP, as established by Public Law 95-397; b. RCSBP enabled her to provide an annuity for her spouse and other eligible beneficiaries; c. she had, by law, only 90 calendar days from the date she received this notice to submit a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); d....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005999
The FSM's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 November 1952. His service record does not show that he made an SBP election. The FSM served in the Regular Army from 28 November 1952 to 31 January 1955.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004305
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100028330 on 23 June 2011. He applied to the Board to terminate his SBP coverage. Beginning 1 October 2008, a member who is at least 70 years of age and has made a minimum of 360 months of premium payments is eligible to have their monthly premiums stopped.