| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Purple Heart (PH).
APPLICANT STATES: That he was personally awarded the Purple Heart Medal while he was in the 111th Naval Hospital, Guam recuperating from his combat sustained wound. He still has the medal in his possession at this time. He has provided a copy of his discharge documents; however, he does not have a copy of the actual citation.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 26 March 1942, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 014 (Automobile Mechanic).
During the period 30 March 1944 to 31 November 1945, he served in the Western Pacific Theater of Operations.
Medical records show that on 22 June 1945, the 86th Field Hospital admitted him for an accidental injury - a laceration of the right thumb, which had occurred on 21 June 1945.
On 1 July 1945, he was admitted to the Fleet Hospital Number 115 for further treatment of his accidental injury. There it was documented that he had cut his thumb when he accidentally tripped a flare on 21 June 1945. He was retained until 20 July 1945 and released for full duty.
On 21 July 1945, he was transferred to the 23rd Replacement Depot, APO 244 by the Department of Patients, 204th General Hospital, APO 246.
On 25 November 1945, a physical examination cleared him for separation and noted he had been treated by the 115th Fleet Hospital on 1 July 1945 for a laceration of the right thumb and had been released to duty on 20 July 1945.
On 26 November 1945, he was honorably separated under Army Regulation 615-365 and the convenience of the Government (Demobilization). His WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge), authenticated by the applicant, does not show entitlement to the PH. It does show he had 3 years, 8 months and 1 day of creditable service.
Army Regulation 615-365, then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for the convenience of the government upon demobilization.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has not provided any, to support entitlement to award of the PH; therefore, he is not entitled to that award. The applicant fails to cite the type of wound or the date of treatment, and has not otherwise shown entitlement to the PH.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_sac____ _jtm_____ _kwl____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068614 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020507 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002260C070206
The applicant also contends that the clinical record shows the award, referring to the printed entry on the clinical record (i.e., "Purple Heart Awarded:"). There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. The Board further determined that the evidence presented for award of the Purple Heart for a wound to the applicant's left leg does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060340C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009324C080407
Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Further, the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in the applicant's service record, or in Item 33 of his separation document.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060512C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012743C071029
The evidence of record includes military medical treatment records and OTSG Hospital Admission Records confirming that the applicant was hospitalized and treated for trench foot, deafness, and psychoneurosis/anxiety while on active duty. The applicant's military record is void of any entries or medical treatment records that indicate he received and/or was treated for a shrapnel wound while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085520C070212
In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. During its original review of the case, the Board found the standard evidentiary records required for awarding the PH were not present. In the opinion of the Board, the War Department notification to the applicant’s mother, and to government officials from the State of Illinois, that the applicant had been wounded in action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088801C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded and hospitalized but the Purple Heart was not listed on his discharge. A search of medical records available to the Board was conducted for any evidence showing that the applicant was wounded in action on 29 June 1943 as indicated by the applicant's eyewitness. Based on the special provisions of the awards regulation, the applicant is entitled to award to the Bronze Star Medal (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) based on award of the Combat...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011815
John M. Moeller | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This case is being considered using reconstructed records, which primarily consist of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 and an OTSG Hospital Admission Record for 1944. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence showing the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of, or caused by enemy action,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011995C071029
The applicant's NPRC file is void of any orders, or other documents, that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration related to award of the PH on 23 June 1945, the date of his separation from active duty. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010989C070208
It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the ETO. However, by regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that a member was wounded or injured in action, that the wound required medical treatment, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct...