| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal. He states, in effect, that he believes he was awarded an Army Commendation Medal as evidenced by information contained in a letter of recommendation authored in 1994 by his supervisor. He also notes that the supervisor "verbally told" him he was being recommended for the award for rewriting the "documentation guidelines" for his "floor" at WBAMC (William Beaumont Army Medical Center). In support of his request he submits a copy of the 1994 letter of recommendation, which was authored by his supervisor.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered active duty on 21 September 1990, in pay grade E-4, and was assigned to WBAMC in April 1991 following completion of training as a psychiatric specialist. The applicant remained assigned to WBAMC for the duration of his enlistment.
The applicant was voluntarily released from active duty on 30 April 1994 as part of the Army voluntary early separation program. His separation document, which he authenticated, does not reflect entitlement to an Army Commendation Medal. It does, however, reflect entitlement to an "expert" weapons qualification badge, the National Defense Service Medal and an Army Good Conduct Medal.
In the letter of recommendation, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, his supervisor recommended the applicant's "application be favorable considered." The supervisor, who addressed the recommendation as "memorandum for individual concerned," was apparently providing a letter of recommendation to the applicant for a potential employer. The letter, which was dated 26 April 1994, indicated the applicant was a "talented, motivated and conscientious soldier" and that "in addition to the National Service Ribbon, a good conduct medal, and a Army Commendation medal [sic]," the applicant had also obtained a perfect score with the hand grenade, rifle and a letter of commendation.
The applicant's records, however, do not reflect either a recommendation for, or an approved award of, the Army Commendation Medal. His records do, however, confirm award of National Defense Service Medal and Army Good Conduct Medal.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the Army Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes herself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. As with all personal decoration, a recommendation, approval by the chain of command, and confirmation in orders is required. During peacetime, the lowest level for approval of the Army Commendation Medal rest with commanders serving in pay grade O-6.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
Although the applicant's supervisor may have indicated in his letter of recommendation that the applicant had been awarded the Army Commendation Medal, there is no evidence in available records, or provided by the applicant, which confirms that information. Even if the applicant had been recommended for the decoration, approval by a commander in pay grade O-6 would have been required, and there is no evidence such an action occurred.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 30 April 1994, the date the applicant was released from active duty. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 30 April 1997.
The application is dated 12 January 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's
entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS __ __INW __ ___JAM__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068581 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020815 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015402
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015402 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests: a. reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he was separated due to physical disability retirement rather than disability severance pay; and b. correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017516
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017516 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 30 April 1993, and a statement, dated 11 October 2007, by his former supervisor, in support of his application. However, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide substantiating evidence that shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001606
The applicant requests correction of her records to show: * her additional skill identifier (ASI) 8A (Critical Care Nursing (CCN)) was reinstated * she is entitled to CCN specialty pay as a result of the correction 2. Part IVc(1)(Character) the comments: [Applicant] has demonstrated a lack of integrity on several occasions, failing to take responsibility for her actions when making serious errors. In March 2015, the applicant herself, in a response to a referred OER, admitted she had made...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061816C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Army Commendation Medal be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal. The DA Form 638 provided by the applicant, dated 8 September 1994, shows the applicant was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious service for the period 14 March 1992 to 15 July 1994. This Board considered all information submitted and all available evidence of record in this case and found no compelling evidence which warranted upgrading...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003578
Block 23 (Remarks) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 100 for the period ending 19 March 1946, in pertinent part, shows he received a Letter of Commendation from Major General B____, Commanding General of the 100th Infantry Division, for duty as Order of Battle Analyst with 100th Infantry Division and was eligible for award of the Army Commendation Ribbon. On 18 July 1957, the Adjutant General informed the applicant that a thorough search of the records for the 100th Infantry Division failed to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000671C070208
The applicant provides a letter from the National Personnel Records Center dated 13 April 2004; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a 4-page printout entitled "Awards Issued Since the Cold War" from an unknown Internet site indicating the UNM and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) were awarded for service in Haiti during the period 16 September 1994 through 31 March 1995 for Operation Uphold Democracy; a Certificate of Achievement; a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009026
The applicant requests, in effect, the award of the Army Commendation Medal for service from October 1988 to February 1992 be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 29 April 1992. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show award of the Army Commendation Medal was approved by the applicants commander in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013806
The doctors recommendation was that the applicant be medically retired from the military. The evidence shows the applicant was evaluated at WBAMC and was diagnosed with migraine induced stroke in August 1991 and 10 November 1992. The applicant was referred to a PEB and the PEB found that the applicant's medical and physical impairment prevented her from performing her duties required by her grade and military specialty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060028C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003096
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of three Army Commendation Medals (ARCOM). Permanent orders, dated 31 May 1991, awarded him an ARCOM for meritorious achievement; unfortunately, his record is void of additional orders awarding him two additional ARCOMs. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.