| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Army Commendation Medal be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal.
APPLICANT STATES: That his Army Commendation Medal should be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal based on injustices covered during the period 14 March 1992 to 15 July 1994. He also states that his award was submitted twice as a Meritorious Service Medal with substantiating achievements to justify the request, but was denied and downgraded to an Army Commendation Medal based on the Brigade Commander’s permanent change of station (PCS). In support of his application, he submits a copy of his original DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), request for Army Commendation Medal, and a statement of support. He also states that an original DA Form 638, request for Meritorious Service Medal is attached to his request; however, when received, this DA Form 638 was not attached to his request.
In a statement of support, he states that the award in question was submitted by his supervisor and was approved as an Army Commendation Medal. He is requesting that this award be upgraded due to substantiated evidence provided with his case. He also states that he spoke with his supervisor prior to his PCS and was informed that he would be recommended for a Meritorious Service Medal as his PCS award. After PCSing to the Saint Louis Recruiting Battalion, he received an Army Commendation Medal in the mail. He called his former supervisor to inquire about the status of his award being upgraded from an Army Commendation Medal to a Meritorious Service Medal. His former supervisor stated that he would resubmit the award with more justification for an award of the Meritorious Service Medal. His award was resubmitted with additional achievements and justification for the Meritorious Service Medal, but was disapproved by the new command to remain as an Army Commendation Medal. These actions were unjust and he requests an upgrade to a Meritorious Service Medal based on the new achievements added to the DA Form 638 that justify
the request. The new justifications are his true caliber, as well as the Meritorious Service Medal related professional achievements.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he enlisted
on 23 October 1984, as an administrative specialist. He continues to serve and
is presently assigned to Headquarters, Third US Army, Fort McPherson, Georgia.
The DA Form 638 provided by the applicant, dated 8 September 1994, shows
the applicant was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal
(First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious service for the period 14 March 1992 to 15 July 1994. The award authority approved the recommendation for the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) and orders were published on 8 September 1994.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may
be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to a members of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who distinguish themselves by outstanding meritorious achievement or service in a noncombat area. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides in paragraph 3-1c that the decision to award an individual a decoration and the decision as to which award is appropriate are both subjective decisions made by the commander having award approval authority.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that his award of the Army Commendation Medal should be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal
based on injustices, that his award was submitted twice as a Meritorious Service Medal with substantiating achievement, and was downgraded to an Army Commendation Medal based on the Brigade Commander’s PCS. However,
there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided
no evidence, to support his contentions.
2. The Board also notes that the applicant stated in his request that a copy of
his DA Form 638, request for Meritorious Service Medal, was attached. However, this DA Form 638 was not attached to his request when received.
3. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for the period 14 March 1992 to 15 July 1994 for meritorious service.
4. The applicant has not presented any evidence to show that the award process or the decision by the appropriate award approval authority for the Army Commendation Medal was flawed or otherwise unjust, improper, or inequitable.
5. This Board considered all information submitted and all available evidence of record in this case and found no compelling evidence which warranted upgrading the applicant’s award of the Army Commendation Medal to the Meritorious Service Medal.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__iw____ __jm____ ___tl___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001061816 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011218 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . ACTIVE DUTY |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 793 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007791
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Meritorious Service Medal and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicants records contain a DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award of (For Other Than Valor) Army Achievement Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and Meritorious Service Medal), dated 2 March 1983. The evidence shows the applicant's recommendation for award of the Meritorious Service Medal was downgraded to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084708C070212
d. Based on the foregoing, the Chief of the Military Awards Branch recommended that the applicant's request should be denied, that he should receive the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) approved by the Commanding General of the 5th Signal Command on 9 May 2002, and that the applicant's servicing personnel center should correct his official records to show this award. COL R, as the Chief of Staff and Headquarters Commandant of the 5th Signal Command at that time, indicated in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090998C070212
The applicant’s OMPF currently shows that she was recommended for award of a MSM and that the recommendation was downgraded by the approval authority and approved as an award of the ARCOM, 1OLC. Evidence of record shows that the approval authority at Fort Leonard Wood revoked the award due to cancellation of the applicant’s PCS. Evidence of record also shows that the ARCOM, 1OLC was never presented to the applicant, thus negating the reason for filing the DA Form 638 in her OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014082
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his additional awards of the Air Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant's integrated Personnel Electronic Record Management System (iPERMS) record contains a citation for an Air Medal (Service), for meritorious service from 26 February to 30 April 2003; an Air Medal (Valor) Narrative, Citation, and Certificate for the Air Medal with "V" Device...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086956C070212
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Upgrade of his retirement award, the Meritorious Service Medal, to an award of the Legion of Merit. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the Legion of Merit is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services and achievements. The Board noted that the next two senior officers in the applicant’s chain of command, the commander of the 18th Personnel and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009673
The applicant requests that his service award, which was downgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) as originally recommended by members of his immediate chain of command. The applicants OER, from 10 January 2003 to 15 June 2003, rated his performance as the Assistant Battalion S-3. However, evidence of record shows that during the period in question, the applicant was awarded an ARCOM for meritorious service from March 2003 to May...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016668
The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his service in Korea, but his orders and discharge document show foreign service. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: a copy of his DD Form 214; his reassignment orders to Korea, dated 8 April 1992; a U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs), News Release announcing the Korea Defense Service Medal; an electronic message, dated 15 November...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013626
This form also shows in: a. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that the applicant's record be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008688
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the Soldiers Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request: * Veterans Services Letter, dated 12 February 2010 * ARCOM, MSM and SM award certificates * SM, BSM, and unknown award citations * DD Form 214 * DD Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) (pages 1 and 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011496
He also states the ROP addressed the Army Commendation Medal he received for meritorious service for the period from 5 April 2004 to 1 June 2009 and determined it was recorded on his DD Form 214, which is also correct. The evidence of record shows that two separate permanent orders awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD...