| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be appointed to the rank of command sergeant major (CSM) and placed on the Retired List in that rank.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he served in the capacity of a CSM while on active duty and after receiving an approved retirement, he was selected for advancement to the rank of CSM. However, he was informed at the time that he would have to withdraw his approved retirement and reenlist in order to accept the appointment to CSM. He goes on to state that he declined to accept the appointment because of extenuating circumstances such as having an approved retirement, having served seven overseas tours, and the opportunity to accept Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) civilian employment. However, he was not afforded the opportunity to accept the advancement for the 2 months left before his retirement and contends that he should have, because he had already occupied the position for 2 ½ years. He continues by stating that it is his desire to be buried as a CSM.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted at Lowry Field, Colorado on 19 June 1946 and remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments. He was promoted to the rank of sergeant major (E-9) on 30 June 1966.
After being promoted to the rank of sergeant major (SGM), he was transferred to Vietnam, where he served as the SGM in Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 124th Terminal Command. He was transferred to Fort Bliss, Texas on 2 July 1968, where he served as a SGM in HHC, Basic Combat Training Committee Group.
The CSM Program was established on 15 July 1967 and the personnel to be considered for selection for advancement to the rank of CSM were scheduled to be considered in increments, by three separate boards. The first CSM board adjourned on 29 December 1967 and was released on 8 January 1968. The second board was scheduled to be completed by March 1968 and the third, and largest board, was scheduled to be completed by July 1968.
On 19 August 1968, Department of the Army Circular Number 611-40 (third CSM Board) announced the applicant’s selection for entry into the CSM Program. The circular provided, in pertinent part, that individuals who were selected and accepted entrance into the program would be subject to worldwide assignments at any time and that the Department of the Army would be notified by message of anyone declining entrance into the program.
On 21 October 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and was transferred to the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SGM/E-9, effective 1 November 1968. He had served 21 years, 7 months and 2 days of total active service.
Army Regulation 614-200 served as the regulation outlining the criteria for entry and removal from the CSM Program. It provided that CSM selectees who have an approved retirement will be administratively removed from the list by the Department of the Army, unless the individual concerned requested withdrawal of their retirement and it was approved by the Department. Personnel accepting entry into the program would be reclassified to the military occupational specialty (MOS) of OOZ50. Entry into the program would not be effective until reclassification was accomplished. Personnel desiring to withdraw from the program, who are serving in the Continental United States (CONUS), must serve in the position for a minimum of 1 year before a request to withdraw from the program will be considered. Under today’s standards, personnel who are eligible for consideration for entry into the CSM program, must make an election to serve in the program before they can be considered. Personnel who decline consideration will not be considered for appointment to the rank of CSM.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. In order to be appointed to the rank of CSM, individuals selected had to agree to be subject to worldwide assignment at any time. Additionally, selectees who had an approved retirement were administratively removed from the selection list unless they took action to withdraw their retirement. By the applicant’s own admission, he declined to accept the appointment to CSM because he had already served seven overseas tours, had an approved retirement and had the opportunity for a civilian job. Accordingly, he was properly retired in the rank of SGM.
3. While the applicant may now believe that he is entitled to be retired in the rank of CSM because he served in the position, he in fact, made a conscious decision not to accept the terms of the appointment. It is also noted that there were no actual CSM positions prior to 15 July 1967, when the CSM program was implemented and the first CSM Board was not adjourned until 29 December 1967. The provisions for acceptance into the CSM program were that individuals not have an approved retirement, be eligible for worldwide assignment at any time and that they must serve at least a year in the program before they could withdraw. The applicant did not enter the program and thus is not eligible for appointment to the rank of CSM in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time.
4. While the Board applauds him for his excellent record of service, he made the decision at the time to decline appointment to the rank of CSM and the Board finds no basis to grant his request for appointment 30 years after the fact.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jlp ___ ___be___ __tl_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068534 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/21 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 319 | 131.0900/ADV RANK |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006483C070205
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20050011146 on 6 April 2006. In discussing the beginnings of the CSM program with the U. S. Army Sergeants Major Academy historian in a previous case, the Board learned that there had been some question as to whether the new CSMs would even wear a different rank insignia from that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711643
On 19 March 1993 the 122 nd ARCOM requested that the 271 st Maintenance Company initiate action to remove the applicant from his ART position based on his reassignment from that unit [loss of dual status with the 271 st ]. The official from USARCOM repeated the information concerning the applicant’s assignment to the 271 st , acceptance and appointment as a CSM, assignment to the 810 th , imminent loss of his civilian position at the 271 st , withdrawal from the CSM program, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074022C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was not selected for appointment to CSM while he was still on active duty, and that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of SGM in accordance with the applicable law and regulations in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board finds no injustice related to the applicant’s assigned retired rank title and is compelled...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011146
The certificate he provided that shows he was appointed a CSM by a captain on 10 March 1967, and the award orders he submitted that show his rank as CSM in the standard name lines do not support a conclusion that he was selected for entrance into the CSM program by a properly constituted DA selection board, which was necessary to support a lateral appointment from SGM to CSM at the time. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was processed for retirement and placed on the Retired...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020072
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was laterally appointed/promoted to command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) - "SGM E9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) - "23 Nov 66" (i.e., 23 November 1966); c. item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties [MOS]) he was awarded primary MOS 13Z5O and secondary MOS 15E5O (Pershing Missile Crewman) on 23 November 1966; d. item 33 (Appointments and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013430C071029
The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) indicates, in Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to the rank of Sergeant Major (SGM) and pay grade of E-9 on 20 January 1976. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no indication that he was ever selected for CSM by a properly constituted Department of the Army (DA) selection board, or that he was ever laterally appointed to the rank of CSM by proper authority while serving on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069609C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to read the grade title of command sergeant major (CSM). Special Orders Number 96, dated 15 May 1986, issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army, authorized the FSM’s REFRAD for the purpose of retirement on 30 June 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the FSM was appointed to the grade title of CSM and was awarded MOS 00Z50, effective 1 February 1968,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017029
Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicants last appointed grade was staff sergeant major [SSM/E-9 (P)] in accordance with the Department of the Army Message 864767, dated 20 May 1968. Therefore, the applicant's rank at the time of his retirement was that of a Staff Sergeant Major (SSM) and this rank is correctly shown on his records. With respect to the applicant's rank at the time of entry into the period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070007516 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), which he authenticated in his own hand on 16 March 1974, shows the entry Grade "SGM", Date of Rank "17 March 1972",...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199705383
Upon his return from leave on 22 September he was informed by the chief of Sergeant Major (SGM) assignments at the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) that he was being removed from the CSM assignment in Hawaii; that he should submit a request (DA Form 4187) to voluntarily withdraw from the CSM program, or barring that, he would remain at Fort Leonard Wood in order to appear before an administrative board, which process would take months. The EMPD director stated that PERSCOM had been...