Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068209C070402
Original file (2002068209C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 25 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068209


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Mr. George D. Paxson Member
Mr. Charles Gainor Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he completed his full 2-year service obligation.

3. The applicant states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied him medical benefits because he did not complete 24 months of active duty. He was shipped from Germany to outprocess at Fort Dix, NJ so he guesses he was released early because that was just how it worked out. He had no intentions of leaving before his agreed-upon term of service. His early release was due to no fault of his.

2. The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 1983 for 2 years. He was serving in Germany at the time of his expiration term of service. The orders assigning him to the transfer point at Fort Dix, NJ are not available. He was honorably released from active duty on 9 May 1985, upon completing his term of service, after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 23 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

3. On 7 January 2002, the VA informed the applicant that he was not eligible for VA medical care as he did not serve at least 24 months on active duty and he did not have any compensable service-connected disabilities.

4. Paragraph 030106 of the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation states that members on excess leave are not entitled to pay and allowances.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The applicant enlisted for 2 years and completed his required active service. However, it appears that due to circumstances beyond the applicant’s control (most likely due to port call considerations), he departed Germany early and separated on 9 May 1985 at which time he had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 23 days of creditable active service. This unjustly prevents the applicant from receiving certain VA benefits.

2. It would be equitable to now show the applicant was placed on 7 days excess leave, was separated on 16 May 1985, and to amend his DD Form 214 to show he separated on 16 May 1985 after completing 2 years of creditable active service. This correction is only for the purpose of entitling the applicant to certain VA benefits and does not entitle him to any additional pay and allowances.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

a. showing the applicant was placed on 7 days excess leave from 10 through 16 May 1985; and

b. issuing to the applicant a Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 215, showing he was on excess leave from 10 through 16 May 1985 and correcting blocks 12b and 12c of his DD Form 214 to show he separated on 16 May 1985 and that he completed 2 years, 0 months, and 0 days of net active service.

BOARD VOTE:

__jl____ __gdp___ __cg____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Joann Langston
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068209
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020425
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.01
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064297C070421

    Original file (2001064297C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct (fraudulent entry, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057437C070420

    Original file (2001057437C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he completed his 2-year service obligation. In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 and a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). He arrived at the separation transfer point early and was honorably released from active duty on 17 July 1986, for his normal ETS, after completing 1 year, 11 months and 24 days of creditable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062599C070421

    Original file (2001062599C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014384

    Original file (20140014384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he completed an honorable period of service in the infantry while stationed in Korea under combat conditions. Orders 155-77 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Dix, NJ, on 4 June 1986, reducing him from SP4/E-4 to private/E-1 on 27 May 1986 and reassigning him to the U.S. Army Transition Point, Fort Dix, for the purpose of out-processing, and subsequent discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057186C070420

    Original file (2001057186C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084952C070212

    Original file (2003084952C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is the Board’s feeling that he was not awarded the Good Conduct Medal due to administrative oversight and he is therefore entitled to this award for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972 and to have this award shown on his DD Form 214. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 3 bronze service stars to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065249C070421

    Original file (2001065249C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 8 January 1988, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged prior to his normal expiration of term of service (ETS) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The separation authority’s approval of the applicant’s recommendation for discharge is not present in his file. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009218

    Original file (20140009218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she entered active duty this period on 5 October 1982 and was discharged on 3 November 1992 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was an outstanding Soldier for nearly 9 years prior to the event that led to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088031C070403

    Original file (2003088031C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 3 January 1997, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073071C070403

    Original file (2002073071C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 December 1981, he was commissioned as a US Army Reserve (USAR) second lieutenant from the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) program at Northeastern State University. This provisions does not result in increased pay, retired or retainer pay, before 23 September 1996, the date of enactment. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.