Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member | |
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart. He states that he did not receive the award in 1968 because "of a record mix-up." In support of his request he submits a copy of his Purple Heart Certificate, a letter from the Office of The Secretary of The Army informing the applicant's congressional representative that authorization had been given to forward the applicant a Purple Heart, and a copy of a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards).
3. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 9 April 1968. Following successful completion of training, he was assigned to Vietnam as an infantryman in September 1968. The applicant was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry and on a 2 November 1968 unit morning report, the applicant's status was changed from "duty" to "WIA" (wounded in action). The status change was effective 31 October 1968 and indicates the applicant was evacuated to the 24th Evacuation Hospital. There is no indication, in available records, that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart at the time.
4. The applicant ultimately returned to duty, and in July 1969 returned to the United States. He completed his service contract at Fort Hood, Texas and on
8 April 1970 was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service. His separation document does not reflect award of the Purple Heart.
5. During the applicant's 2 years of active Federal service he consistently received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings. He was promoted to pay grade E-5 in April 1969 and retained that grade until his separation. There is no evidence of any misconduct or disciplinary problems in available records. His awards included an Army Commendation Medal, two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge.
6. In 1985, in response to an inquiry by the applicant to his congressional representative, he was awarded the Purple Heart in recognition of wounds sustained as a result of hostile action on 31 October 1968. The Adjutant General of the Army approved the award on 21 May 1985. The award, however, was never added to the applicant's separation document.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-10 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on 31 October 1968 and awarded the Purple Heart in 1985. His records should be corrected accordingly.
2. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 8 April 1970. There is no evidence his commander ever disqualified him from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying him the award. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate, and in the interest of equity, to award him that decoration for the period 9 April 1968 through 8 April 1970.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action 31 October 1968; and
b. by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period
9 April 1968 through 8 April 1970.
BOARD VOTE:
__LLS___ ___PM__ __DPH __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___ Luther L. Santiful____
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002067995 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20020806 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083155C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect a Purple Heart he was awarded as a result of a wounds sustained during combat operations in the Republic of Vietnam. There are no orders which award him the Purple Heart and there is no evidence that he was wounded, or treated for wounds, as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. Evidence of record indicates that the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for two awards of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076689C070215
Paragraph 2-15b provides that requests for reconsideration, which are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case will be considered only if the staff of the Board determines that substantial relevant new evidence shows fraud, mistake of law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or that there is substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000644C070206
The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded on 10 April 1970 and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart (2nd Award). The Board accepts the evidence provided by the applicant, combined with the entry on his DA Form 20, as sufficient to show he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for injuries sustained during hostile action on 10 April 1970 in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009069C070205
Orders show the applicant received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23 October 1969 in Vietnam. Since there is no evidence of record which shows that he was wounded as a result of hostile action on any date other than 23 October 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a second award of the Purple Heart in this case. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006028C070206
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. In view of the above, and in the absence of more conclusive evidence that shows the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart or correction of his records to show this decoration. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087483C070212
This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant’s DD Form 214...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090693C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart he was awarded for wounds he received in the Central Highlands in Vietnam in December 1966 be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 1965. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant four bronze service stars to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003309C070205
He was awarded the Purple Heart for the wounds he received in action on 22 March 1969; however, the general orders were not filed in his service personnel records and therefore, the Purple Heart was not included on his DD Form 214 when he was released from active duty. The evidence shows the applicant served in Vietnam for over six months and was medically evacuated from Vietnam for wounds he received there. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086676C070212
Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned. The Military Police Report contained in his records shows that the applicant and another soldier went into a bar and when told that the bar was closed, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004472C070208
The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart based on injuries he received in Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 March 1968 to 4 March 1970; award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit...