| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Joyce A. Hall | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member |
2. The applicant requests the Combat Medical Badge (CMB).
3. The applicant states in effect, that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) as a medical officer and as a flight surgeon. He was consistently and directly involved in field medical operations. He was involved in combat operations and hostile enemy action. He believes that the criteria for the award of the CMB was met and exceeded several times during his tenure of service in the RVN. His major command failed to provide for this award.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was appointed First Lieutenant on 9 July 1967 in the U. S. Army Reserve. He entered active duty on 10 September 1967 in the rank of Captain. After completion of his required training the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty 3160 (Aviation Medical Officer).
5. On or about 1 December 1967, the applicant departed for the RVN. He was assigned to Headquarters, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment as a flight surgeon. He was also assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 123rd Aviation Battalion as a battalion surgeon. On or about 26 November 1968, the applicant departed the RVN.
6. On 9 September 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve. His Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) shows as authorized awards the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 60, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Army Commendation Medal and 2 Overseas Service Bars. It does not show the CMB as an authorized award.
7. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record, which show that he was awarded the CMB. There also is no evidence in his service record that shows he was recommended for the award of the CMB.
8. The applicant’s Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66) shows that he was assigned to an Armored Cavalry Regiment and to an Aviation Battalion. There is no evidence that he served in the medical unit of an infantry regiment or that he served in an infantry unit in active ground combat.
9. The applicant’s record shows that he served in the RVN from 1 December 1967 through 26 November 1968, serving through five campaigns – Vietnam Counter Offensive, Phase III from 1 June 1967 through 29 January 1968; Tet Counter Offensive from 30 June 1968 through 1 April 1968; Vietnam Counter Offensive Phase IV from 2 April 1968 through 30 June 1968; Vietnam Counter Offensive Phase V from 1 July 1968 through 1 November 1968 and Vietnam Counter Offensive Phase VI from 2 November 1968 through 22 February 1969.
10. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. His participation in the five campaigns entitled him to the award of one silver service star. However, this award is not reflected on his DD Form 214.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment
was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 7 September 1966 – 10 August 1968, based on the Department of the Army General Orders #60, dated 1969. This unit award is not shown on his DD Form 214.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Medical Badge could be awarded to Medical Department personnel assigned or attached to infantry units of brigade or smaller size who satisfactorily perform medical duties while the unit is engaged in actual ground combat, provided they are personally present and under fire. The award was established to recognize medical aidmen who shared the same hazards and hardships of ground combat on a daily basis with the infantry soldier. So stringent was this requirement
during the Vietnam era that recommending officials were required to document the place (in six-digit coordinates), time, type and intensity of fire to which the proposed recipient was exposed. This fact naturally precludes the awarding of the badge to those medical personnel who accompany infantry units into a potential engagement area but do not come under enemy fire.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was awarded the CMB.
2. There is no evidence that the applicant served a period of qualifying service in a medical unit of an infantry regiment in active ground combat with the enemy as required by regulation for award of the CMB.
3. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was assigned to a unit at the time that the unit was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The evidence also shows that the applicant served in the RVN during
five campaigns, entitling him to wear one silver service star on the Vietnam Service Medal.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__fne___ __wtm___ __cjp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002067960 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020502 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0113 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470
The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343
The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029
It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017104C071108
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017104 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the CMB. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008105
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 December 1966 to 5 December 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025763
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device, Combat Medical Badge (CMB), and two awards of the Purple Heart. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in the RVN. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correcting his DD Form 214 to show a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021784
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the following awards: * Combat Medical Badge (CMB) * Air Medal (AM) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The evidence of record confirms the applicant held a medical MOS and served with a qualifying unit necessary for the award of the CMB, while that unit earned the VUA and MUC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011556
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 1 silver service star with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540
Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word or is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officers statement and evidence that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028632
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 March 1974 to show the Combat Medical Badge (CMB), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and any other unit awards to which he may be entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 1974 the Vietnam...