Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025763
Original file (20100025763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025763 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device, Combat Medical Badge (CMB), and two awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states the awards were entered incorrectly or were omitted from his DD Form 214.  He states he was awarded the second Purple Heart for an incident which occurred on 3 April 1968.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, orders for the ARCOM with "V" Device, and a photograph.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 June 1967 and upon completion of initial entry training he was awarded military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).

3.  Headquarters, Fort Polk, LA, Special Orders Number 203, dated 7 August 1967, awarded him the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

4.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 17 November 1967 to 13 November 1968.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served with the 2nd Battalion, 17th Artillery, while in the RVN.  Item 40 (Wounds) shows he received an injury to his left ring finger on 15 February 1968.

5.  Headquarters, I Field Force Vietnam, General Orders Number 236, dated 12 March 1968, awarded him the ARCOM with "V" Device for actions on 15 February 1968.

6.  Headquarters, I Field Force Vietnam, General Orders Number 12, dated 13 March 1968, awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 15 February 1968.

7.  On 12 June 1970, he was released from active duty in the rank of specialist five/E-5 after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Army Commendation Medal
* Purple Heart
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)

8.  There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded a second Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action on two occasions.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.  There is also no evidence showing he was awarded the basic award of the ARCOM or that he was awarded or recommended for the CMB.

9.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board's staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS).  This is a web based index containing general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  No orders pertaining to the applicant were found in ADCARS.

10.  He provides a copy of a photograph of a group of Soldiers.  He claims to be the Soldier in the center of the picture and also claims to be wearing the CMB on his uniform.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the CMB is awarded to Army Medical Department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 contains the regulatory guidance for the Vietnam Service Medal and states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.  Appendix B contains the campaigns for the RVN conflict and shows participation credit was awarded for the following five campaigns during his tour of duty in the RVN:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967-29 January 1968)
* Tet Counteroffensive (30 January-1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April-30 June 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July-1 November 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968-22 February 1969)

14.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in the RVN.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 17th Artillery, was cited for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1965-16 April 1971 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 54, dated 1974.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the ARCOM with "V" Device, CMB, and two awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  General orders confirm he was awarded the ARCOM with "V" Device.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, he participated in five campaigns during his tour of duty in the RVN; therefore, he is entitled to one silver service star to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect these service stars.

4.  Based on his service with the 2nd Battalion, 17th Artillery, while in the RVN, he is also entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

5.  Orders show he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  This badge should also be added to his DD Form 214.

6.  There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded a second Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action on two occasions.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correcting his DD Form 214 to show a second award of the Purple Heart.

7.  There is no evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for the CMB. 
The governing regulation states that in order to be eligible for the CMB, the Soldier must be assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  He served with an artillery unit while in the RVN.  Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the CMB.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal and 

	b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to a second award of the Purple Heart and the CMB.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025763



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025763



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012114

    Original file (20110012114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and that all of his authorized awards be added to his DD Form 214 ( Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served 4 years, 1 month, and 14 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059327C070421

    Original file (2001059327C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device and First Oak Leaf Cluster, the Purple Heart, the Air Crew Wings (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge), the Army Service Ribbon, the Combat Medical Badge, the Presidential Unit Citation, and all other authorized awards. The same regulation provides that one bronze service star is authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal for each campaign when assigned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010460

    Original file (20080010460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to the list of awards on his separation document (DD Form 214). The record is void of orders awarding the applicant the CMB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 25 October 1966 through 17 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007981C070208

    Original file (20040007981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022686

    Original file (20120022686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 26 March 1969 to 11 August 1969; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to: * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Battalion, 46th Infantry Regiment, 198th Infantry Brigade, Vietnam, as a medic from 5 April through 27 July 1969 * Medical Holding Company, 106th General Hospital, Japan in a patient status from 28 July through 10 August 1969 c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076514C070215

    Original file (2002076514C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Order Number 8, issued in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to United States Army Vietnam or Military Assistance Command Vietnam and its subordinate units from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973. Lacking any derogatory information on file in the applicant’s record or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, the Board concludes that he served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008105

    Original file (20130008105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 December 1966 to 5 December 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017104C071108

    Original file (20060017104C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017104 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the CMB. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to...