Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067772C070402
Original file (2002067772C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 14 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067772

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Joyce A. Hall Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show his name as M------ J---- M------- instead of M------C---- S--------.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is using his birth name and he wants his records corrected to reflect the name given to him at birth. In support of his application the applicant submits a copy of a court order dated 26 March 1997 from the state of Michigan, which shows his name change.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1986, under the name of M------ C---- S--------. On 6 December 1991, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U. S. Reserve under the same name. His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) authenticated in his own hand shows his name as M------ C---- S--------.

On 8 January 1992, the applicant enlisted in the Virginia Army National Guard (VARNG) under the name M------ C---- S--------. His enlistment contract authenticated in his own hand shows his name as M------ C---- S--------. On
15 April 1993, the applicant was discharged from the VARNG under the same name.

The applicant provides a copy of a court order from the state of Michigan which shows his name change from M------ C---- S-------- to M------ J---- M-------.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. In establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.



2. Although the applicant provides a copy of a court order changing his name to M------ J---- M-------, he appropriately served in and was discharged under the name he provided upon his entry into active duty and the VARNG. While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to have the records changed, it finds no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mhm___ __kan___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067772
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020514
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063946C070421

    Original file (2001063946C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show his middle name as J___ vice L____, and to correct his date of birth (DOB) to read 18 December 1958 vice 11 December 1954 and to correct his place of birth (P.O.B.) EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003388C070205

    Original file (20060003388C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army, served, and was released from active duty under the name of J___ A______ L_____ and that his date of birth is consistently recorded in his military service records as 31 March 1950. The discovery concerning the applicant's name and date of birth did not come about until after the applicant was discharged from the Army. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005061C070205

    Original file (20060005061C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 28 April 1968. The applicant provides a Standard Certificate of Birth that shows the name J____ G_______ and requests correction of his military records to remove the middle name/initial from his military service records. Therefore, considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076612C070215

    Original file (2002076612C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show his birth name. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075846C070403

    Original file (2002075846C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record shows the applicant authenticated his name in his own hand as E---- R----- throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090501C070212

    Original file (2003090501C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101196C070208

    Original file (2004101196C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that he was separated on 25 April 1985 under the name of Dwayne M. W___. He should provide a copy of this Board action to the Department of Veterans Affairs to show that, while the Army finds no basis for changing his records, it accepts the birth certificate as evidence that Dwayne M. W___ and Willie C....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060846C070421

    Original file (2001060846C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show her current sex and name. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086844C070212

    Original file (2003086844C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090885C070212

    Original file (2003090885C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...