| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Lutz | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his General Discharge (GD) be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge (HD).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was separated because he was arrested in the civilian community for shoplifting and spent 8 days in jail. He believes that 25 years is long enough to pay for one mistake. He adds that an upgrade would enhance his employment opportunities.
4. The applicant’s military records show that, on 23 June 1975, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 31B, Field Radio and Electronics Specialist.
5. Following basic combat training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and MOS training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, he was awarded MOS 31B and assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with duty as a field radio mechanic.
6. On 20 September 1976, the applicant's company commander initiated action to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program, or EDP), Army Regulation 635-200. He informed the applicant that he was recommending a GD. The applicant acknowledged notification and voluntarily consented to discharge.
7. The company commander forwarded the separation packet to the battalion commander and stated that the applicant "consistently displayed the inability to adapt to military standards . . . [or] show[ed] any promotion potential." Further, he had a "poor attitude, lack of motivation, and [an] apathetic approach to his job." He was relieved as the company commander's radio operator because he could not carry the equipment or execute simple radio procedures. He was incompetent and also a disciplinary problem with one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice [the record of NJP is not in the applicant's file].
8. On 30 September 1976, a major, serving as acting battalion commander and the approving authority, approved the applicant's separation with a GD. He was separated on 7 October 1976. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) shows that he had 1 year, 3 months, and 7 days of creditable active Federal service and 8 days of lost time from 22-29 September 1975.
9. There is no indication that the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade within the statutory time limit imposed by that board.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. As amended by Department of the Army messages, the regulation then in effect covered discharges under the expeditious discharge program wherein only a commander in the rank of lieutenant colonel or above could separate soldiers who demonstrated that they could not, or would not meet acceptable standards required of enlisted personnel. Personnel discharged under this provision were given honorable or general discharges.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was not separated because of an arrest by civil authorities for shoplifting; there is no mention of this arrest in his military records. The applicant was separated under the provisions of the EDP for failure to meet acceptable standards required of enlisted personnel.
2. According to Army Regulation 635-200 then in effect, EDP separations could only be approved by commanders in the rank of lieutenant colonel and above. The applicant's expeditious discharge was approved by a major.
3. The applicant's separation is improper. In similar situations, the ADRB has upgraded the characterization of service to fully honorable and has changed the authority and reason to paragraph 5-3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Secretarial Authority.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the GD (DD Form 214) of 7 October 1976 now held by the individual concerned and by issuing to him an HD of the same date with paragraph 5-3, AR 635-200 as the authority and Secretarial Authority as the narrative reason.
BOARD VOTE:
__kak___ __tap___ __bjl___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Karol A. Kennedy
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002067707 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021029 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19761007 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C5-31 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A40.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062430C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his General discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. Otherwise, a commander was required to separate soldiers under the provisions of the regulation which in most cases resulted in an other than honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013477
Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, the applicant's record contains a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) which shows that he entered active duty on 9 September 1980 and was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-31, Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP), on 28 January 1982, in the pay grade of E-1, under honorable conditions. This Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066530C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 17 December 1976, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 and the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). He also acknowledged that he could only be discharged under the EDP if he agreed to the discharge and that he could withdraw his consent anytime prior to approval by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012302
There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, while a general discharge is authorized, it appears that in the applicants case a general discharge was unduly harsh under the circumstances as the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010978
He also states he was advised he could request an upgrade of his discharge to honorable 6 months after his discharge date. The commander also informed him that he intended to recommend he receive a General Discharge Certificate and advised him of his rights to consult with legal counsel to discuss the ramifications of this recommendation and to submit a statement in his own behalf, to decline the discharge, or to waive any of the aforementioned rights. On 2 January 1979, the separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004337C070206
The applicant’s military record indicates that he accepted NJP for being AWOL for 5 days, however, the particulars are missing from his file. There is no indication in the record that the applicant applied for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15 year statute of limitations. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits an application to the Army Discharge Review Board or this Board requesting a change in discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009935
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 26 March 1976, the separation authority approved the applicants separation under the provisions of the EDP, and directed the applicant receive a GD. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020854
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 May 1977, the applicant's commander informed him he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP)), and that he was recommending he receive a GD Certificate. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012610
On 13 January 1976, the separation authority approved the applicants separation under the provisions of the EDP, and directed the applicant receive a GD. There is no indication in the record that the applicant applied for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's separation processing under the provisions of the EDP was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014734
On 21 and 22 June 1976, the applicant's immediate commander counseled him for his poor attitude, lack of motivation, lack of promotion potential and provided him information (requested by the applicant) on the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). The commander also informed the applicant that he intended to recommend that he receive a General Discharge Certificate and advised him of his rights to consult with legal counsel to discuss the ramifications of this recommendation and to submit a...