| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he did not realize at the time that taking pills or drugs would get him an undesirable discharge. He further states that the Board should change his discharge because he was a young man and did not understand the consequences of his mistakes.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, though somewhat incomplete and reconstructed, show:
He was born on 12 March 1949 and was inducted in Chicago, Illinois, on 3 February 1970. He was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to undergo his training.
On 9 March 1970, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 1 March to 8 March 1970. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay.
On 7 May 1970, NJP was imposed against him for being AWOL from Fort Campbell from 14 April to 6 May 1970. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
The applicant completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 22 November 1970, for duty as a light weapons infantryman.
On 1 April 1971, while serving in the pay grade of E-3, NJP was imposed against him for the wrongful possession of heroin. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2 (suspended for 60 days), a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 26 April 1971, NJP was imposed against him for sleeping on guard duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 26 May 1971, NJP was imposed against him for being AWOL from 18 May to 19 May 1971. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and extra duty (suspended for 1 month).
On 17 August 1971, NJP was imposed against him for being AWOL from 11 August to 12 August 1971. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 11 October 1971, the applicant’s commander initiated action to bar him from reenlistment. He cited the applicant’s disciplinary record, his failure to respond to numerous counseling sessions and several rehabilitative transfers as the basis for his recommendations. He also indicated that the applicant was pending trial by a summary court-martial for misuse of government property and pending separation for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. The applicant elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. The appropriate authority approved the bar to reenlistment on 5 November 1971.
He departed Vietnam on 22 November 1971 and was transferred to Ireland Army Hospital, Fort Knox, Kentucky.
The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do show that he was extended in Vietnam pending approval of his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness. He was discharged at Fort Knox, from the medical holding company, under other than honorable conditions on 3 Jan 1972, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness due to drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit-forming narcotic drugs or marijuana. He had served 1 year, 10 months and 17 days of total active service and had 13 days of lost time due to AWOL.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It provided, in pertinent part, that members who displayed traits of drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit-forming drugs or marijuana were subject to separation for unfitness. Members were normally enrolled in a treatment program before separation and an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.
2. The character of the discharge appears to commensurate with the applicant’s overall record of service, considering the circumstances of the case.
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, the offenses committed by the applicant were too serious and his overall record of service is too undistinguished to mitigate relief.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kak ___ __ao____ __rjw ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002067635 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1972/01/03 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | UNFIT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 594 | 144.5300/A53.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004681C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was honorably discharged on 29 July 1969 and reenlisted on 30 July 1969, for a period of 3 years and assignment to Vietnam. On 14 August 1970, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being disrespectful in language towards a superior noncommissioned officer.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013898
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In October 1967, he was assigned the duties of a cook. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007443
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also states that at the time of his discharge in 1971, he was unaware of the problems his discharge would cause because of his mental problems at the time. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days and a forfeiture of pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015182
The applicant states that his discharge should be upgraded due to his honorable service in Vietnam. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant contends that his undesirable discharge should be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge based on his honorable service in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077600C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded a to general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He served in Vietnam for a period of one year as a supply clerk. Evidence of record shows that the applicant applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for upgrade of his discharge to general conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072150C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005748C070205
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 2 March 1970, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being AWOL during the period 31 January 1970 to 26 February 1970. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015227
On 19 November 1971, the defense counsel stated that the applicant was diagnosed in Vietnam with a character and behavior disorder and a civilian psychiatric report confirmed the diagnosis. The ADRB noted that on 22 October 1970 the applicant was diagnosed with a character and behavior disorder and based on the requirements of Army Regulation 635-212, as stated by his defense counsel; he should have received a General Discharge Certificate. In spite of this, the evidence of record shows...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090196C070212
The applicant states that after he was discharged, he continued to use alcohol and drugs. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-years statute of limitations. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020288
His records show he served in Vietnam from 12 January 1971 to 16 October 1971. The board recommended his discharge for unfitness with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant was accordingly discharged on 26 October 1971.