Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067617C070402
Original file (2002067617C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 27 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067617

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to show his 211 days of active duty and 5 plus years of service in the Army National Guard (ARNG). He also requests that the reference to his active service being Active Duty Training (ADT) be deleted.

APPLICANT STATES: That his military records will show that he served more than 6 months of active duty.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the ARNG in pay grade E-1 with no prior service on 20 May 1963.

On 20 August 1963, the applicant entered active duty as a member of the ARNG. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training, was awarded a military occupational specialty, and was honorably released from active duty and was returned to his ARNG unit on 19 February 1964. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he completed 6 months of active duty during that period and had 3 months and 1 day of prior inactive (ARNG not on active duty) service. The DD Form 214, item 19, Current Active Service Other Than by Induction, Source of Entry, has “Ordered to ACDUTRA [active duty for training]” entered. Item 32, Remarks, has “6 MONTHS ACDUTRA” entered, along with “Released from active duty and returned to State Control as a member of the Army National Guard of Florida to complete remaining service obligation of 5 years 2 months and 29 days.”

On 10 March 1969, the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group due to his position being classified as excess due to the reorganization of his unit.

On 19 May 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR at the expiration of his term of service.

Army Regulation 635-5, Personnel Separations, Separation Documents, limits the issuance of DD Forms 214 for Reservists to those who have performed 90 or more days of continuous active duty.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. All the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct, that he served 6 months of active duty for training.

2. It would appear that the applicant believes that his DD Form 214 should reflect the short periods of active service (such as annual training) he performed subsequent to his initial entry training. This is not an accurate assessment. A DD Form 214 records the service and accomplishments of a soldier at the moment of its issue. Subsequent service is recorded in the manner prescribed by Army Regulations. Since the applicant did not perform another period of active duty of 90 days or more, he was not entitled to have another DD Form 214 issued to reflect his additional active duty for training.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rtd____ ____inw__ _____kaw DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067617
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020627
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004382C070206

    Original file (20050004382C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 by the U.S. Army, with an effective date of 18 April 1959, which officially documents this ACDUTRA. Therefore, the applicant's state Army National Guard Records and the applicant’s Department of the Army records should be corrected to show he completed his six months of active duty for training from 19 October 1958 through 18 April 1959. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004304C070208

    Original file (20040004304C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 19a (current active service other than by induction – source of entry) on his August 1965 separation document be corrected to show that he was ordered to active duty vice ordered to ACDUTRA (active duty for training). The applicant states that he was on active duty for 1 year and 9 months and was not on active duty for training as his separation document indicates. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant enlisted in the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007501

    Original file (20130007501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending on 3 October 1964 to show: * him being activated for Operation Desert Storm on 22 January 1991 * his total years of service 2. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The available record shows the applicant served on ACDUTRA in his USAR status from 2 May 1964 to 3 October 1964.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106232C070208

    Original file (2004106232C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The undated DD Form 95 provided by the applicant states, "(applicant), Your reporting date for 6 Months active duty is, 5 Jul6 1967. The DD Form 95 provided by the applicant is noted; however, the available evidence shows he was released from active duty after only 16 weeks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020890

    Original file (20090020890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 4 months and 22 days of creditable active military service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. He must also submit documentary evidence such as his DD Form 214, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23 (Army National Guard Retirement Credit Record), DA Form 1380 (Record of Individual Performance or Reserve Duty Training), and/or any other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009504C070208

    Original file (20040009504C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be issued a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for his period of active duty during the period from 22 June 1968 through 30 July 1968. The applicant provides a copy of: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 16 April 1964; b. his DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) that shows his effective date of entry on active duty as 22 June 1968;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085225C070212

    Original file (2003085225C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the entry “ORDERED TO ACDUTRA” (ordered to active duty for training) be deleted from item 17 of his separation document. He contends that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) and then went on active duty for 1 year, 7 months and 10 days, with service in Germany. It is evident that the applicant was not ordered to active duty for training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007820

    Original file (20140007820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, his Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) unit was activated for about 9 months during the Wilmington Riot of 1968. The applicant's Army military service record shows as a member of the DEARNG he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and entered active duty on 24 October 1966. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002109C070206

    Original file (20050002109C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that Item 17, of the DD Form 214, states that he was, "Ordered to ACDUTRA (active duty for training) for 18 months and 1 day." He requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he was ordered to active duty for 18 months and 1 day. The applicant was release from active duty for training on 26 September 1965 and was returned to state control as a member of the Oregon Army National Guard to complete his remaining service obligation of 5 years and 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...