Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067610C070402
Original file (2002067610C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067610

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he had inadequate counsel at the time of his discharge and that with counsel he would have stayed in the Army. He contends that he was 18 years old and that his mother was dying at the time. He also contends that he has had no trouble since 1957.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). However, the applicant’s Certification of Military Service shows that he entered active duty in the Army of the United States on 4 February 1957.

The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records. However, separation orders, dated
9 December 1957, indicate the applicant was discharged from military service and issued an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, separation program number 488 (undesirable habits and traits) on
10 December 1957.

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel having undesirable habits and traits of character. The regulation provided for the separation of personnel who:
(1) gives evidence of an antisocial or amoral trend, chronic alcoholism, drug addiction, pathological lying, or misconduct; (2) possesses unclean habits;
(3) repeatedly commits petty offenses not warranting trial by court-martial;
(4) is a habitual shirker; (5) is recommended for discharge by a disposition or other board of medical officers because he possess a psychopathic (antisocial) personality disorder or defect, or is classified as having “no disease” by the board, and his record of service reveals frequent disciplinary actions because of infractions of regulations and commission of offenses, or it is clearly evident his complaints are unfounded and are made with the intent of avoiding service; or
(6) demonstrates behavior, participation in activities, or associations which tend to show that he is not reliable or trustworthy. The regulation also provided that when discharged because of undesirable habits or traits of character an Undesirable Discharge Certificate will be furnished.



DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions. However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.

2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons appear to be appropriate.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

INW____ MMD____ JTM_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067610
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020416
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (UD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19571210
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-208
DISCHARGE REASON Undesirable habits and traits
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068951C070402

    Original file (2002068951C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 1959 the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant be required to appear before a board of officers to determine if he should be discharged for undesirable habits or traits of character under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. Counsel also called the board’s attention to the report of psychiatric evaluation, showing that the applicant had acted out against authority, which could be channeled by correct counseling. The applicant was discharged on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002852C070205

    Original file (20060002852C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 24 August 1957 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 based on undesirable habits and traits of character. Although the applicant's discharge packet is not available, it is presumed the separation authority appropriately directed issuance of an undesirable discharge based on his overall record. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the type of discharge issued to him was in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007307

    Original file (20140007307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 March 1959, his commanding officer recommended his elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character) and requested a board of officers to determine whether the applicant should be discharged prior to his expiration of term of service date. There is no evidence that shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003113C070205

    Original file (20060003113C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003113 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he was not court-martialed, but he was taken before a board of officers. On 14 May 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), by unanimous vote, denied the applicant’s request for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056266C070420

    Original file (2001056266C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded. On 11 July 1957, the applicant’s unit commander completed a statement in which he recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Army. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and that the character of the discharge was commensurate with his overall record of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019545

    Original file (20110019545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record includes a letter from the NPRC Records Reconstruction Branch, dated 15 January 1991, informing him he had been erroneously issued an NA Form 13038 showing his service was terminated by "general discharge under honorable conditions." The applicant is advised to destroy the erroneous NA Form 13038 in his possession showing he was separated by "General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052826C070420

    Original file (2001052826C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board accepted his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004029

    Original file (20070004029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has provided insufficient evidence to show that his discharge was unjust. The evidence shows that the applicant's undesirable discharge was upgraded to general, under honorable conditions, on 20 December 1974. The evidence shows that the applicant's undesirable discharge was not upgraded to an honorable discharge, only a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086694C070212

    Original file (2003086694C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214) and an Extract of Military Records of Previous Convictions (DD Form 493).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007939

    Original file (20110007939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. He states that he was told at the time of his discharge that if he stayed out of trouble for six months his discharge would be changed to a general discharge. The board of officers recommended the applicant be discharged from the service because of undesirable habits or traits of character and that he be issued an undesirable discharge certificate.