| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with
60 Device. He also, requests, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his blood type.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his tour of duty in Thailand entitles him to award of the VSM and the RVN Campaign Medal with 60 Device. Also, his
DD Form 214 should reflect his blood type. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 12 September 1969, he entered the Army for 3 years. His was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 55B (Ammunition Storage and Operations Specialist) and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4 (SP4/E-4). It also confirms that he was assigned to Thailand and served with the 599th Ordinance Company, as an ammunition records clerk, from 21 February 1970 to 8 February 1971. In addition, his medical record contains a copy of his Immunization Record (Standard Form 601), which confirms that his blood type is A positive.
5. On 15 March 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing a total of 2 years, 6 months, and 4 days of active military service. On the date of his separation, he was issued a DD Form 214 that he authenticated with his signature. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) lists only the National Defense Service Medal and the Marksman Marksmanship Badge (Rifle). This list of awards in Item 24 does not include the VSM or the RVN Campaign Medal with 60 Device.
6. On 9 December 2000, a correction to the applicant’s DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was published by The Adjutant General of the Army, which corrected Item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding a Letter of Commendation, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal.
7. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Table 2-1 (DD Form 214 Preparation Instructions), in effect at the time, stated that the blood group from the soldier’s Immunization Record (Standard Form 601) would be entered in item 30 (Remarks).
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on awarding the VSM. It states, in pertinent part, that members attached or assigned to units in Thailand, Laos, and/or Cambodia, serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam were also eligible for this award.
9. Paragraph 9-19 contains guidance on awarding the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). It states, in pertinent part, that service for 6 months in Vietnam or outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam that contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and its Armed Forces is a qualifying period for this award. Further, that individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal are entitled to award of the RVNCM with 60 Device.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board finds the applicant’s contention that his record should be corrected to show he earned the VSM, the RVNCM with 60 Device, and that his blood type should be added to his separation document has merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s service in Thailand from 21 February 1970 to 8 February 1971 entitled him to receive the VSM and the RVNCM with 60 Device. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record at this time.
3. The applicant’s Standard Form 601 confirms his blood type as A positive and the Board finds it would appropriate to add this information to Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device; and by adding the entry “Blood Type-A+” to Item 30 of his DD Form 214; and by issuing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE__ ___LE___ ___TL___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Fred N. Eichorn___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002067162 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/03/28 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013751
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Accordingly, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017075
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand. By regulation, the VSM and RVNCM are authorized for members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to Republic of Vietnam (RVN) operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is eligible for the VSM and RVNCM with Device (1960) based on his service in Thailand;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016899
The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 15 December 1965. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating that the applicant's unit or he served in direct support of operations in the RVN, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the RVNCM and/or the VSM for service in Thailand has not been satisfied in this case. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015065
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 7 May 1970, be corrected to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00896
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant’s records do not indicate that he was eligible for award of the RVNCM, that his unit was awarded the RVNGC w/P, or that he was ever assigned/attached to the 8th TFW...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634
--The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002020
Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 2 February 1968 to 1 February 1970. Although it was not until March 1972 that Change Number 15 to Army Regulation 635-5 authorized an entry on the DD Form 214 to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964, there is no harm in adding his Vietnam service during the period 2 February 1968 to 1 February 1970 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005202
Item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 11B at the time of discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Armys awards policy. The guidance for item 24 stated to enter all awards earned during the period covered by the DD Form 214.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01960
His complete submission is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for awarding the RVCM, stating they were unable to verify the applicant’s service in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months or that he served outside the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088773C070403
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to the RVN from 8 February...