Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067081C070402
Original file (2002067081C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 18 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067081

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Adjustment to his date of rank for first lieutenant to 29 May 1998.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was not promoted to first lieutenant in a timely manner due to administrative error. He also states that he met all promotion criteria outlined in Army Regulation 135-155, chapter 2 and in ARPC Form
155-R. He submits copies his appointment orders dated 31 May 1996, promotion memorandum dated 21 December 1998, his certificate of clearance and/or security determination, service school evaluation report, two officer evaluation reports and a memorandum of support from his commander dated 27 June 2001 in support of his request. His commander stated that the applicant was not timely promoted based on administrative error.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was appointed in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard as a second lieutenant effective 29 May 1996.

He was promoted to first lieutenant effective 21 December 1998.

Documentation submitted with the application dated 27 June 2001 shows that his commander requested approval from the Office of Reserve Promotions, Total Army Personnel Command for adjustment of the applicant’s date of rank for first lieutenant to 29 November 1997.

Army Regulation 135-155, prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers. This regulation specifies that Reserve officers appointed prior to 1 October 1996 in the grade of second lieutenant will be considered for promotion after serving 3 years time in grade without review by a selection board. This will be determined far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date promotion service is completed. The regulation also shows that 2 years of time in grade is required on 1 October 1996.

The Reserve Officers Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), a public law enacted by Congress on 5 October 1994, prescribes the policies and procedures to consolidate and modernize the laws that govern Reserve component officers. The law was implemented on 1 October 1996. ROPMA provides that Reserve officers appointed on or after 1 October 1996 in the grade of second lieutenant will be considered for promotion to first lieutenant after serving 2 years time in grade without review by a selection board.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to his date of rank for first lieutenant. He has not shown error, injustice, or inequity for the relief he now requests.

2. The applicant’s contention, as well as his commander’s statement, that he was not promoted to first lieutenant in a timely manner and promoted 30 months after his commissioning date have been noted by the Board. However, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant effective 29 May 1996 prior to the implementation of ROPMA, which became effective 1 October 1996. He was promoted to first lieutenant effective 21 December 1998, 6 months earlier than the required 3 years. The Board also notes that promotion to first lieutenant prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years time in the lower grade and that a promotion date of 29 November 1997 would be less than 2 years of time in grade completed.

3. The applicant’s date of rank for first lieutenant of 21 December 1998 was proper. He has not shown otherwise.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_bje____ _fne_____ _reb____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067081
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020418
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2. 131.01
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067492C070402

    Original file (2002067492C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ROPMA also specifies that in order to be qualified for promotion to captain, an individual must have completed 7 years of time in grade as a lieutenant, and an officer basic course, and a BA degree on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: He was considered and recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006638

    Original file (20080006638.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his date of rank (DOR) for captain from 10 April 1998 to 2 October 1997 and adjustment to his DOR for major from 2 June 2004 to the approval date of the 2003 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a second lieutenant and 4 years as a first lieutenant before promotion to captain. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008767C070205

    Original file (20060008767C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his dates of rank for first lieutenant, captain, major, and lieutenant colonel. He was promoted to lieutenant colonel with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 30 December 2005, based on the board approval date. The applicant was selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 2005 selection board with a PED of 18 May 2006, and promoted with a date of rank of 30 December 2005, the approval date of the board, in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011134C070206

    Original file (20050011134C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), effective 1 September 1994, paragraph 4-17 stated a qualified 1LT would not be promoted before the date of completion of 3 years of promotion service with two specified exceptions (neither of which applied to the applicant). Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) provides policy for selecting and promoting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009463

    Original file (20090009463.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a second lieutenant and 4 years as a first lieutenant before promotion to captain. The applicant is not entitled to adjustment of his date of rank for major from 2 June 2004 to 17 July 2003, the approval date of the 2003 RCSB, as there is no evidence he was considered and selected for promotion by this board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087569C070212

    Original file (2003087569C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was promoted to first lieutenant effective 9 June 1997. ROPMA provides that Reserve officers appointed on or after 1 October 1996 in the grade of second lieutenant will be considered for promotion to first lieutenant after serving 2 years time in grade without review by a selection board. Under ROPMA an officer appointed as a second lieutenant on or after 1 October 1996 would be eligible for promotion to first lieutenant upon completion of 2 years TIG, officers appointed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091553C070212

    Original file (2003091553C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was promoted to first lieutenant effective 22 July 1996. ROPMA provides that Reserve officers appointed on or after 1 October 1996 in the grade of second lieutenant will be considered for promotion to first lieutenant after serving 2 years time in grade without review by a selection board. Under ROPMA an officer appointed as a second lieutenant on or after 1 October 1996 would be eligible for promotion to first lieutenant upon completion of 2 years time in grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081326C070215

    Original file (2002081326C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is asking the Board to take action and adjust his date of rank for captain and promotion eligibility date to the next higher grade to 30 November 1995. He was promoted to captain effective 14 September 1998. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001694C070205

    Original file (20060001694C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to captain under the 1996 year criteria and adjustment to his date of rank for captain from September 1998 to December 1996, if selected. He is requesting that his date of rank be adjusted for his promotion to captain by one year. ROPMA provides that a second lieutenant serve a MYIG of 2 years before promotion to first lieutenant, and a first lieutenant serve a MYIG of 5 years before promotion to captain and that an officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087560C070212

    Original file (2003087560C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a Memorandum for Record dated 17 January 2002, the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch, states that the applicant could not be promoted at his promotion eligibility date of 21 February 1998, because all promotion qualifications were not met. The date of rank and effective date of his promotion was 8 May 2001 (Security Clearance Date). Through no fault of the applicant, his security clearance was not granted until 18 May 2001.