Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067080C070402
Original file (2002067080C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067080

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, award of the Purple Heart and disability compensation for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

APPLICANT STATES: That he was wounded on 1 May 1968 in Vietnam. He also contends, in effect, that he is entitled to disability compensation for PTSD. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge); an undated Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letter granting service-connected disability compensation for PTSD at 100 percent; a DVA Rating Decision, dated 11 December 2000; an undated DVA letter granting service-connected disability compensation for PTSD at 70 percent; orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge; and two eyewitness statements, dated 22 February 2002 and 10 February 2002.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was inducted on 18 August 1967. He served as an armor intelligence specialist in Vietnam from 13 February 1968 through 12 February 1969 and was honorably released on 15 August 1969.

The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

In support of his claim for the Purple Heart, the applicant provided two eyewitness statements, dated 22 February 2002 and 10 February 2002. These statements attest that the applicant was wounded in action on 1 May 1968 in Vietnam.

There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on his DA Form 20 does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

In support of his claim for disability compensation, the applicant provided DVA documentation which shows he was granted service-connection disability compensation for PTSD at 100 percent effective 3 October 1997.

The available records do not contain the applicant’s separation physical examination prior to his separation on 15 August 1969.

The available records fail to show the applicant was diagnosed with PTSD prior to his separation on 15 August 1969. There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant had any medical condition prior to his separation.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

Army Regulation 40-501, at paragraph 3-3a, provided, in pertinent part, that performance of duty despite an impairment would be considered presumptive evidence of physical fitness.

Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he was wounded in action on 1 May 1968 in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action.

2. The Board also considered the two eyewitness statements provided in support of the applicant’s claim for the Purple Heart. However, these statements made over 34 years after the fact are not sufficient by themselves as a basis for award of the Purple Heart in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

3. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to disability compensation for PTSD. However, there is no medical evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no medical evidence, which shows that he was diagnosed with PTSD prior to his separation from active duty on 15 September 1969. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request for disability compensation.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JLP____ AAO_____ RKS_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067080
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020604
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2. 108.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003702C070206

    Original file (20050003702C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003702 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105881C070208

    Original file (2004105881C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 November 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004105881 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Therefore, these statements by themselves are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, particularly when other evidence of record shows he was not wounded as a result of hostile action. Therefore, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002069

    Original file (20090002069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention that he did not receive any disability rating for his Vietnam combat injuries to his left shoulder, left index finger, and fragment wounds to his right hip. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition may not be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03249

    Original file (BC-2003-03249.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was diagnosed with adult onset diabetes in 1983 and is receiving Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation for diabetes mellitus based on provisions of Title 38 for presumptive service connection for Agent Orange exposure due to service in Vietnam. In an application dated 23 September 2003, the applicant requested award of the PH. As noted by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant, while the applicant is suffering from a medical condition that is presumed under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05362

    Original file (BC-2012-05362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05362 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is entitled to the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. There is no evidence the applicant was in Vietnam during April 1968. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000416

    Original file (20080000416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Assault Badge, the Long Range Reconnaissance Platoon (LRRP) Badge (Tab), the Purple Heart, and any other citations to which he is entitled. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant completed an air assault training course. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show the LRRP Badge (Tab) is noted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019050

    Original file (20080019050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's desire to be awarded the Purple Heart based on having qualified for service-connected benefits from the DVA is acknowledged; however, award of the Purple Heart cannot be granted solely because the applicant was granted service-connected benefits from the DVA. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078739C070215

    Original file (2002078739C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on...