Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067070C070402
Original file (2002067070C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 16 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067070


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Paula Mokulis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) contract be corrected to show he signed it on 27 August 2001 and that he receive back pay retroactive to that date.

3. The applicant states that he started the contracting process in mid-August 2001. When he was told he needed a medical waiver for his Lasik eye surgery, he completed it and sent it in by 21 August 2001. However, the waiver was improperly processed and, because the school lost its administrative technician, it took three months for the error to be found, corrected, and the waiver to be properly completed. Once the waiver was properly processed, it took 1 week to be completed.

4. The applicant does not have military records. Information obtained from alternate sources show he was already in the Army National Guard and had taken a periodic physical exam at Madigan Army Medical Center on 11 February 2001. It was noted in item 43 of the Report of Medical Examination, SF 88, that he had had Lasik surgery on both eyes. He was found to be qualified for retention. Apparently, this was the physical exam used to determine his medical qualification for ROTC. The front of the SF 88 was originally stamped to indicate he was physically qualified for appointment in the U. S. Army Reserve.

5. Apparently on 1 August 2001, an Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Nonscholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597, on the applicant was initiated, education to commence 27 August 2001.

6. On 21 August 2001, the applicant requested a medical waiver because of his eye surgery. It apparently was held up because the physical exam was not provided. Apparently, the signed physical was returned to the school indicating the applicant was qualified for appointment in the U. S. Army Reserve and the packet then sent to U. S. Army Cadet Command. Apparently, on 29 October 2001 it was discovered that the waiver could not be processed because the physical exam had to be corrected to show the applicant was medically disqualified for ROTC. The SF 88 was returned to Madigan Army Medical Center, properly stamped to show he was medically disqualified for ROTC, sent back to the school, and forwarded on to U. S. Army Cadet Command. Apparently on 5 November 2001, U. S. Army Cadet Command requested another document. That document was completed and sent to U. S. Army Cadet Command on 7 November 2001. On 16 November 2001, the applicant’s medical waiver was approved. He signed his contract on 27 November 2001.

7. The applicant provides a letter of support from his Assistant Professor of Military Science. He states the applicant completed and submitted all the forms he was told to in a timely manner. He was enrolled as a Military Science III cadet in August 2001 and, through no fault of his own, he was unable to contract in


August at the start of the school year. He finally contracted in November 2001. He participated in all activities and completed all tasks he was asked to complete.

8. Nonscholarship ROTC students can receive a stipend ($300 for juniors, $350 for seniors) during their last two years. The applicant’s Assistant Professor of Military Science confirmed that by “back pay” the applicant means the stipend. He also confirmed that the applicant has actively participated in ROTC since school started in August 2001.

9. Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment and appointment, including officer procurement programs, and for retention and separation. The standards for enlistment and appointment are higher than those for retention and separation. Chapter 2 governs the medical fitness standards for enlistment and appointment. Paragraph 2-12c(2) states that a history of keratorefractive surgery accomplished to modify the refractive power of the cornea and laser surgery to reconfigure the cornea are causes for rejection. Chapter 3 governs the medical fitness standards for retention and separation. Paragraph 3-15, Eyes, does not list laser surgery as a cause for referral to a medical evaluation board.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board accepts the evidence provided as showing that an injustice has occurred in this case. Since the applicant was already a member of the Army National Guard, it was reasonable for him to presume that he would have been fully qualified for ROTC. Had he been properly informed that he needed a medical waiver and how to properly complete that medical waiver in a timely manner, the Board presumes it would have been approved, as it eventually was, in time for him to sign his contract prior to the start of the school year.

2. The applicant’s Assistant Professor of Military Science confirmed that the applicant actively and in a competent manner participated in ROTC since the school year started in August 2001. It would be equitable to show that he completed his medical waiver request in a timely manner and that it was approved in time for him to sign his ROTC contract on 27 August 2001, the day his education commenced, thereby qualifying him for any authorized stipend effective 27 August 2001.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing his request for a medical waiver was properly submitted and approved prior to 27 August 2001.

2. That the applicant’s DA Form 597 be amended to show it was signed on 27 August 2001.

3. That the applicant be paid any authorized ROTC stipend effective 27 August 2001.

BOARD VOTE:

__fne___ __rwa___ __pm____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Fred N. Eichorn
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067070
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020516
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 104.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014639C070206

    Original file (20050014639C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    An ROTC Cadet Command Form 131-R (Cadet Action Request) was prepared on 8 March 2002 requesting the applicant be given a waiver for civil conviction. An NGB memorandum dated 10 November 2005 indicates she was granted a civil conviction waiver, apparently for appointment as an officer. During the applicant’s disenrollment board, the recorder noted the applicant had the responsibility for personally initiating any request for waiver of enrollment eligibility requirements.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068705C070402

    Original file (2002068705C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Imbedded in her 10 page Army Senior Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract (DA Form 597-3), which the applicant authenticated, were provisions which stated that she understood that she could "not enlist in the Active Army, another military service, or in a military service academy while I am a contracted ROTC cadet unless I am properly released from my ROTC cadet status." The contract also stated that if the applicant were disenrolled from the ROTC program the "Secretary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018252

    Original file (20080018252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 September 2008, the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC program under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraphs 3-43a(12), (14), and (15). Paragraph 3-43a(12) of Army Regulation 145-1 states that nonscholarship and scholarship cadets will be disenrolled for misconduct, demonstrated by disorderly or disrespectful conduct in the ROTC classroom or during training, or other misconduct that substantially interferes with the ROTC mission, including participation in unlawful...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021219

    Original file (20120021219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states the applicant obtained a medical waiver for anxiety and depression to enroll in the ROTC Program. Counsel states the applicant was advised that she had two options for withdrawing from the ROTC Program, one was to voluntarily disenroll or request medical disenrollment and the second option was nonparticipation. Therefore, it would be appropriate to show she was disenrolled from the ROTC Program by reason of medical disqualification and canceling her ROTC debt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000526

    Original file (20100000526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was berated by the PMS, and was told to start going to class and to pull his grades up enough to pass. Counsel states that during Christmas break the applicant was given an ultimatum from his PMS that he had to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), go to all of his classes, and graduate on time or he would be disenrolled. The investigating officer told the applicant he was being disenrolled for cheating but there was never any opportunity for the applicant to hear the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020301

    Original file (20120020301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was discharged due to having a LASIK procedure within the 6-month period prior to his entry on active duty. It also shows that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant contends his RE code of "3" should be changed because he had successful LASIK eye surgery, his vision is now 20/15, and he would like to reenter military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065964C070421

    Original file (2001065964C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) scholarship contract date be corrected to read 4 September 2001. However, he was given a Department of the Defense Medical Examination Review Board physical examination (DODMERB). A letter from the enrollment officer explains that the applicant has been present for ROTC classes since 30 August 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011795C070206

    Original file (20050011795C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Cadet Command Surgeon reviewed the medical documentation provided by the applicant and determined him to be medically qualified, since controlled hypothyroidism is not disqualifying. The U. S. Army Cadet Command Surgeon’s opinion that the applicant is medically qualified, since controlled hypothyroidism is not disqualifying, has been considered. The applicant has provided evidence to show that he has a medical condition, hypothyroidism, which causes obesity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003887

    Original file (20070003887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was counseled for failing to meet the minimum Army standards for the record APFT. The DA Form 4856 dated 21 February 2005, shows that the applicant was counseled for failure to show up for PT for almost 2 months. The board proceedings are available in the record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018680

    Original file (20070018680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board of officers recommended that disenrollement proceedings be completed for voluntary breach of her Army ROTC contract. A review of the applicant's Cadet Record Brief shows that she was disenrolled from the ROTC Program on 16 January 2003, due to refusal of a commission. The applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for breach of contract on 22 October 2002.