Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018252
Original file (20080018252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	       26 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018252 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he was not disenrolled from the Reserve OfficersÂ’ Training Corps (ROTC) program under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1 (Senior ROTC Program: Organization, Administration, and Training), paragraphs 3-43a(12),(14), and (15).  

2.  The applicant states that he was a cadet who was disenrolled from the ROTC program at Widener University under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraphs 3-43a(12), (14) and (15).  However, he contends that paragraph 
3-43a(14) had nothing to do with any of the reasons for his disenrollment.  He claims the former Professor of Military Science chose to include this paragraph simply for the language, yet did not bother to look beyond the surface of the provision.  He argues that this calls into question whether any of the provisions were properly applied.  He believes they were not.  The applicant points out that there was one incident in which he was reprimanded and received two negative spot reports, that his father was battling cancer during the time that all of his supposed transgressions occurred, and that he struggled to maintain his military bearing and discipline.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); an excerpt from Army Regulation 145-1; and his disenrollment letter, dated 5 September 2008, in support of his application.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 10 July 2001 for a period of 8 years.  He was ordered to active duty on 4 January 2005 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Kuwait/Iraq from 27 June 2005 to 
10 June 2006 and was released from active duty on 8 July 2006.   

2.  On 4 September 2007, the applicant signed a ROTC nonscholarship cadet contract and agreed to enlist in the Reserve Component of the United States Army (with an assignment to the USAR Control Group (ROTC)) for a period prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.  

3.  On 5 September 2008, the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC program under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraphs 3-43a(12), (14), and (15).  His disenrollment was due to his misconduct and undesirable character as demonstrated by compromising his integrity by telling a master sergeant that he was attending lab at Widener University and telling another master sergeant that he was attending lab at Pennsylvania State University; his disrespect to cadre and high ranking cadets; and an indifferent attitude and lack of interest in military training as evidenced by his frequent absences from lab and physical training.

4.  The applicant was released to his Army National Guard unit to fulfill his Military Service Obligation.  He is currently serving as a sergeant in the Army National Guard. 

5.  Paragraph 3-43a of Army Regulation 145-1 states, in pertinent part, that a nonscholarship cadet may be disenrolled by the Professor of Military Science.  

6.  Paragraph 3-43a(12) of Army Regulation 145-1 states that nonscholarship and scholarship cadets will be disenrolled for misconduct, demonstrated by disorderly or disrespectful conduct in the ROTC classroom or during training, or other misconduct that substantially interferes with the ROTC mission, including participation in unlawful demonstrations against the ROTC, illegal interference with rights of other ROTC students, or similar acts.

7.  Paragraph 3-43a(14) of Army Regulation 145-1 states that nonscholarship and scholarship cadets will be disenrolled for undesirable character demonstrated by cheating on examinations, stealing, unlawful possession, use, distribution, manufacture, sale (including attempts) of any controlled substances, as listed or defined in 21 U.S. Code 812, discreditable incidents with civil or university authorities, falsifying academic records or any forms of academic dishonesty, failure to pay just debts, or similar acts.  Such acts may also be characterized as misconduct.
8.  Paragraph 3-43a(15) of Army Regulation 145-1 states that nonscholarship and scholarship cadets will be disenrolled for indifferent attitude or lack of interest in military training as evidence by frequent absences from military science classes or drill, an established pattern of shirking, failure to successfully complete an established weight control program, or similar acts.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends that paragraph 3-43a(14) of Army Regulation 145-1 had nothing to do with any of the reasons for his disenrollment, evidence of record shows that he was disenrolled from the ROTC program due to his misconduct and undesirable character as demonstrated by compromising his integrity by telling a master sergeant that he was attending lab at Widener University and telling another master sergeant that he was attending lab at Pennsylvania State University.  This behavior represents discreditable incidents with university authorities as listed in paragraph 3-43a(14) of Army Regulation 145-1.     

2.  Evidence of record also shows the reasons for the applicant's disenrollment due to his misconduct and undesirable character included disrespect to cadre and high ranking cadets and an indifferent attitude and lack of interest in military training as evidenced by his frequent absences from lab and physical training.  There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was improperly disenrolled from the ROTC program under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraphs 3-43a(12), (14), or (15).  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 



are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __XXX_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018252





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018252



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018680

    Original file (20070018680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board of officers recommended that disenrollement proceedings be completed for voluntary breach of her Army ROTC contract. A review of the applicant's Cadet Record Brief shows that she was disenrolled from the ROTC Program on 16 January 2003, due to refusal of a commission. The applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for breach of contract on 22 October 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018186

    Original file (20120018186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a DD Form 597-3, dated 31 August 2009, which states in: a. paragraph 3c(1) (Cadet Obligation), cadets understand and agree they will incur an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation after the first day of their military science II year (sophomore year) if they are a 3, 4, or 5 year scholarship recipient; and b. paragraph 5 (Terms of Disenrollment), he understood and agreed that once he became obligated and was disenrolled from the ROTC program for breach of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059864C070421

    Original file (2001059864C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 30 October 1998, under the ROTC Scholarship Cadet Program. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from ROTC under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a(15). The applicant acknowledged that she understood and agreed that if she was disenrolled from the ROTC program during Military Science II, she could be called to active duty for a period of two years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002539

    Original file (20130002539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides * Disenrollment of Scholarship/Nonscholarship Cadet from ROTC memorandum and acknowledgement packet * ROTC Disenrollment from ROTC memorandum * DA Form 5315-E (U.S. Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record) * Letter from Progressive Financial Services, Inc. Part I (Agreement of the Department of the Army) an agreement for a period of 4 academic years for full tuition and fees and flat rate of $900.00 for books and laboratory expenses; b. Paragraph 5 (Terms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003589

    Original file (20110003589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was also notified that as a scholarship cadet, if the disenrollment was approved, she could be called to active duty in an enlisted grade of E-1 or be required to repay scholarship benefits in the amount of $21,605.00 in lieu of call to active duty in fulfillment of her contractual obligations. On 24 January 2008, a Cadet Action Request was initiated by her PMS strongly recommending disenrollment as she requested and that she pay back her scholarship through financial means. On 5 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003887

    Original file (20070003887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was counseled for failing to meet the minimum Army standards for the record APFT. The DA Form 4856 dated 21 February 2005, shows that the applicant was counseled for failure to show up for PT for almost 2 months. The board proceedings are available in the record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010779C070208

    Original file (20040010779C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she desires the Board waive her scholarship debt because she was disenrolled from the SROTC program based on charges of having an indifferent attitude/lack of interest in military training, and for having an undesirable character by cheating on an SROTC examination. Additionally, the Cadet Command advised the applicant that her SROTC contract had been breached, and that she was responsible for repaying the Government $51,350.00 for advanced educational...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003983

    Original file (20150003983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He requests the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) review his case for relief of his $24,471 debt, which was incurred as a result of disenrollment from the ROTC Program in 2008. (1) Paragraph 5a (I Agree to Serve on Enlisted Active Duty) states "Under the terms of this contract, the Secretary of the Army or his or her designee, may order me to active duty as an enlisted Soldier, if I am qualified, for a period of not more than 4 years if I fail to complete the ROTC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085077C070212

    Original file (2003085077C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In the opinion of the Board, the applicant has failed to provide any evidence or argument that shows that there was any error or injustice related to his disenrollment from the ROTC program or to his being required to repay the scholarship money he received, as was required by his ROTC contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013928

    Original file (20140013928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows the applicant's disenrollment was due to a breach of the ROTC contract based on his failure to maintain a minimum semester academic GPA of 2.0 on a 4.0 scale and his indifferent attitude as evidenced by frequent absences from military training. However, there is no evidence of record and counsel provided no evidence that shows the applicant was erroneously disenrolled from the ROTC Program. Since it appears the applicant failed to maintain a GPA of 2.0 for each semester...