| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That his understanding of the English language was minimal, at best, when he enlisted. When he was asked to sign papers in conjunction with his discharge, he did so without understanding what they represented or meant. He thought that he was going to be given a general discharge because he did not understand the language or Army regulations. Since his discharge he has been a model citizen, has never been in trouble with the law, and will give his life to the country at any time.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 October 1974. The enlistment packet he completed in conjunction with his application to enlist showed that he had entered into the United States, a Cuban citizen, on 1 August 1970, attended and graduated from a United States grammar school, and attended a United States high school for a year.
He successfully completed his initial entry training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of helicopter repairman.
The applicant departed Absent Without Leave (AWOL) on 9 August 1975 and remained AWOL until 2 December 1975.
On 16 January 1976, the applicant was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. (The applicant’s records do not contain his discharge packet. As such, the court-martial charge sheet, the counseling statement concerning the type of discharge which could be expected and the ramifications of an undesirable discharge, and the document which shows the request being approved are not available.)
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Since the applicant’s discharge packet is not contained in his military records, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must presume administrative regularity in his discharge process.
2. The Board does not accept the applicant’s contention that he had a limited grasp of the English language. He graduated from a US grammar school, and attended a US high school for a year. In addition, he completed training in a relatively high skill MOS, an MOS which would require extensive reading.
3. The Board also doesn’t accept that the applicant was unaware that he was requesting a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. Any soldier knows it is a court-martial offense to go AWOL. The applicant was AWOL for 116 days.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jns____ ___eja___ ___tl____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002067015 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020625 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | A71.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057751C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant’s record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012530
On 7 September 1962, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Individuals would be discharged by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it had been determined that an individual's military record was characterized by discredit, including frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. When authorized,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015226
The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 June 1974. When separation for unsuitability was directed, a general or honorable discharge was issued. However, there is no evidence that the applicant went AWOL during his first enlistment (except from 18 to 19 June 1975), which is the period of service being considered.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057770C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071335C070402
The applicant departed AWOL from 29 August – 28 September 1970. On 27 September 1971, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was given a general discharge from the Army on 27 September 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002853
The applicant requests correction of: * Item 42 (Education (Years)) of his WD Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Service), ending on 19 March 1948, to show completion of 4 years vice 2 years of high school * Item 36 (Non-Service Education (Years Successfully Completed)) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), ending on 27 November 1951, to show completion of 4 years vice 1 1/2 years of high school 2. When he enlisted in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009064C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 09 AUGUST 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040009064 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge. On 22 December 1971, the appropriate separation authority approved his discharge request under the provisions of Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081835C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that the undesirable discharge given her son, a former service member (FSM), be upgraded to honorable. The FSM's military records show the FSM enlisted in the Army for 3 years on 2 April 1974 and was processed at the Armed Forces Entrance Examination Station, Jackson, Mississippi. That all Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was discharged from the service with his service characterized as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061756C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 23 November 1973, the appropriate authority approved his request for separation under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10 with an UCOTH discharge and directed the issuance of a DD Form 258A, Undesirable Discharge Certificate. There is insufficient evidence in the available records to indicate that the applicant suffered a nervous breakdown in basic training.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090279C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 7 January 1975, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He also contended that he was misled by his defense attorney and did not know that he was going to get an undesirable discharge until he received it and that up until that time he...