| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Arthur O. Omartian | Member | ||
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
3. The applicant states that he tried to be a good soldier and tried real hard for 12 days before he went absent without leave (AWOL). Because of his educational level and depression, he found it very hard to fit in and do the training. He provides as supporting evidence a letter from a family friend who states the applicant quit school in the 6th grade by order of his father, who thought the applicant was not learning and/or had a learning disability; his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214; his grammar school grade reports; and an undated, unidentified document (possibly from the Social Security Administration) which noted that the applicant was identified (in 1991 and 1992) as having borderline intellectual functioning or (in 1996) was mildly mentally retarded and that he suffered from major depression with isolative tendencies and social impairments.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was born on 21 February 1952. He completed the 6th grade (he repeated 1st grade, passed 2d grade with “As” and “Bs,” passed 3d grade with “Cs,” passed 4th grade with “Cs” and “Ds,” passed 5th grade with “Cs” and “Ds” and one “B,” passed 6th grade with mostly “Ds,” and failed 7th grade twice). He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 August 1970 with an Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) score of 22 (category IV, the lowest of four possible categories).
5. The applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on 17 August 1970 for being AWOL from 15 – 16 August 1970.
6. The applicant departed AWOL from 29 August – 28 September 1970. His Enlisted Qualification Record, DA Form 20, shows he had another period of AWOL from 14 – 21 October 1970 that is not reflected on his DD Form 214.
7. On 31 March 1971, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 7 November to on or about 28 December 1970 and from 30 December 1970 to on or about 23 February 1971. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 105 days.
8. On 12 August 1971, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation.
9. The applicant’s discharge packet is not available.
10. On 27 September 1971, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had completed 4 months of creditable active service and had approximately 299 days of lost time.
11. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. A discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate. If warranted, however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.
2. While the conduct which led to the applicant’s separation cannot be condoned, it appears that his contention that his low educational level made it hard for him to train (there is no evidence to show he suffered from depression at the time), therefore leading him to go AWOL, has some merit. He completed only a 6th grade education and his grade reports show that he had not done well in school since the 2d grade. While the unidentified document he provided showed that he was not diagnosed as having borderline intellectual functioning until 1991 or as being mildly mentally retarded until 1996, these conditions are usually present from birth or childhood.
3. Had the applicant served in the Army only a few years later, most likely he would have been discharged under the Trainee Discharge Program. That program expeditiously discharged trainees who lacked the necessary motivation, discipline, ability or aptitude to become productive soldiers. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to justify upgrading his discharge based upon mitigating circumstances.
4. The applicant should understand that, if he attempts to obtain veterans benefits based upon this upgrade, the Department of Veterans Affairs grants benefits based upon their own policies and regulations.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was given a general discharge from the Army on 27 September 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service.
2. That the applicant be issued a General Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, dated 27 September 1971, denoting a general discharge in lieu of the undesirable discharge now held by him.
3. That the applicant be issued a new DD Form 214 reflecting the above corrections.
BOARD VOTE:
__KAK__ __AOA__ __RJW__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Karol A. Kennedy___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002071335 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/09/27 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008449
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008449 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090015242, on 23 March 2010. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063627C070421
It provided, in pertinent part, for the discharge due to unsuitability of those individuals with character and behavior disorders and disorders of intelligence as determined by medical authority. However, at the time of the applicant’s separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was discharged from the service with an Honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020938
In his letter he details how, in the case which substantiated an allegation of trainee abuse while he was a DS, he was not afforded an opportunity to address the allegations during the investigation due to a violation of his due-process rights by the FHIG Office. Simply stated, he was directed by the chain of command to conduct the PT on those fields. IG's who conduct investigations or investigative inquiries obtain evidence to determine if the allegations are "substantiated" or "not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022162
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018280
He recommended the applicant's discharge under Army Regulation 635-206. The evidence of record shows the applicant underwent a psychiatric evaluation on 26 May 1970 for several "nervous breakdowns." At the time the applicant stated that the only solution was a discharge from Army and that he would go AWOL or insane if he was not discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086497C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations it is concluded: The applicant's contention that he was young and immature at the time is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009567
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, the brother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests an upgrade of his late brother's under other than honorable discharge to an honorable discharge. On 4 June 1971, the appropriate separation authority approved the FSMs requests under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate and reduction to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014096
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 29 June 1973, he was discharged accordingly. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008238
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008238 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 17 August 1973, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations Discharge Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, and Absence Without Leave or Desertion)) for prolonged AWOL - unauthorized absence in excess of 1 year. On 4 September...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021239
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, his psychiatric examination indicated a borderline condition and that at the time, there was no evidence which indicated psychoses sufficient to warrant medical disposition under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40.