| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he did not enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
APPLICANT STATES: That he was automatically enrolled in the SBP. He thought he had marked the box electing not to participate in the SBP.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 19 October 1941. After having had prior active duty and service in other Reserve components, he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve on 20 March 1990. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 22 July 1994. He apparently did not enroll in the Reserve Component SBP.
On 3 May 2001, the applicant completed a Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, DD Form 2656. He failed to check any subitem in item 26. The SBP option in item 26g is “I elect not to participate in SBP.”
Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members entitled to retired pay could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. A failure to make any election defaults to automatic coverage.
Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence of Government error or injustice in this case. The evidence of record indicates the applicant erred in failing to check item 26g of the DD Form 2656, which clearly indicated one of the SBP options was not to participate. Therefore, he was automatically enrolled in the SBP.
2. The applicant will have a one-year opportunity to disenroll from the SBP effective 19 October 2003. His spouse will receive the protection of the SBP during the interim.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __bje___ __reb___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002066593 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020418 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012627
Public Law 99-145, enacted on 8 November 1985, but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouses written concurrence for a retiring members election that provided less than maximum spouse coverage. The evidence shows that at the time he submitted his DD Form 2656 he did not indicate in block 26g that he elected not to participate in the SBP. Therefore, since he has failed to show that he was misinformed of his options under the SBP and since he has the option of terminating his SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008355
The applicant states she elected not to participate in the SBP, she did not check the box left to line 26g (Beneficiary Category(ies), I Elect Not to Participate in SBP), and her spouse concurred with her decision. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provided less than maximum spouse coverage. However, the applicant did not now provide an up-to-date statement from her spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029388
The spouse's signature MUST be notarized] of the DD Form 2656 is neither signed by his spouse to indicate her concurrence or non-concurrence with his election nor by a witness and/or retirement services officer. The evidence of record shows he retired on 13 July 2009 by reason of temporary disability. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010623
She was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 10 February 2011, her 60th birthday. On 14 February 2011, she completed a DD Form 2656 wherein she indicated she was married. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001830C070206
Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 30 November 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656. The instructions for Section XI of the DD Form 2656 inform the member, in part, that an otherwise eligible spouse must concur if the member declines to elect SBP coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007710
The applicant provides a copy of DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 1 July 2005; a copy of DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan Termination Request), dated 15 May 2007; a copy of DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 21 May 2007; and a copy of DFAS-CL Form 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement), effective 3 May 2007, in support of this request. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001830C070206
On 30 November 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656. The instructions for Section XI of the DD Form 2656 inform the member, in part, that an otherwise eligible spouse must concur if the member declines to elect SBP coverage. The available evidence shows his spouse did not sign in Section XI concurring with an election not to participate in the SBP at the time the DD Form 2656 was originally prepared.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021300
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009786
The applicant provides a statement from his spouse. In item 32 (Member), the statement reads "Also I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. c. In Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage; the date of the spouse's signature in item...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065902C070421
Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows that the applicant did complete a DD Form 1883 in 1991 enrolling in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage. Although the applicant may not have been in troop unit at the time, he could have contacted a retirement services officer at the nearest military installation or contacted the Retired Activities Office, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center for...