| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Melinda M. Darby | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be reinstated and he receive retroactive payments.
APPLICANT STATES: That he enlisted in the New Hampshire Army National Guard in July 2001. Supporting evidence is as listed on the DD Form 149.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 September 1975. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (Food Service Specialist). He was promoted to Sergeant, E-5 on 1 November 1982.
On 10 January 1992, the applicant requested early separation and elected to receive the VSI. His request was approved and on 30 August 1992 he was discharged under the Voluntary Early Transition Program (VSI) after completing 16 years, 11 months, and 16 days of creditable active service. On 31 August 1992, he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve for 3 years. Apparently, he reenlisted on an unknown date. He was discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve on 21 March 2000. He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 20 July 2001.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 established voluntary incentive programs to support the Army drawdown. Under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB), an eligible member of the armed forces would receive a lump sum payment equal to 15 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of active service. Soldiers who applied for this incentive were required to enter into a written agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than 3 years, in addition to any remaining military service obligation based in statute, following the separation from active duty. The VSI was an annual annuity payment equal to 2.5 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of service and paid for twice the number of years served. Soldiers approved for VSI must have been appointed, enlisted, or transferred to the Ready Reserve for the entire period they received VSI annual payments. VSI annual payments would be discontinued if the solder separated from the Ready Reserve unless he died, in which event the VSI payments would continue to be paid to his designated beneficiaries for the remaining period authorized or if he became ineligible to continue to serve in the Ready Reserve due to medical or age limitations, in which case the soldier would be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve and he would continue to receive annual VSI payments for the remaining period authorized.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The eligibility requirements for receipt of the SSB and VSI were comprehensively briefed to soldiers at the time they were established. The applicant was aware that he had to be in the Ready Reserve for the entire period he received VSI annual payments. The applicant provides no explanation as to how or why he was discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve and the Board presumes it was based upon his expiration term of service. If that was the case, he should have been aware that his term of service was expiring and he needed to reenlist in order to continue receiving VSI payments. Aside from the two exceptions noted, there is no provision for reinstating the VSI annual payments once a soldier has separated from the Ready Reserve.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__inw___ __mmd___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002066484 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020416 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.22 |
| 2. | 135.03 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057042C070420
The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) and not the Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant states, in effect, that he initially requested separation under the VSI but changed his mind at the Fort Dix, NJ separation and transfer point and requested the SSB. His DD Form 214, item 18 shows he was authorized the SSB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507983C070209
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he separated from the service with entitlement to the voluntary separation incentive (VSI) option of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) instead of the special separation benefit (SSB) option he received. However, at the time of separation, he received payment under the SSB option. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508891C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP). Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. On 5 June 1992 he submitted a request to change his election to separate under the SSB option instead of the VSI option.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508451C070209
As a second alternative, he requests correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the VSIP. Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. Further, the PERSCOM noted that case that the approval of the applicants request for the SSB option and the implementation of the legislatively amended VSI benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509392C070209
The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, inasmuch as he separated from active duty under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program (VSIP), he is obligated to remain in the USAR in some capacity as a condition of receiving his annual VSI payments. Although it is a requirement for USAR soldiers to request transfer to the Retired Reserve or another USAR Control Group in lieu of being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510341C070209
The Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel message dated 20 December 1991 that originally announced the VSIP to support the Army drawdown, stated, in pertinent part, that soldiers in the pay grade of E-4 (promotable) and below with more than 7 years of service as of 31 December 1991 could apply for separation under the VSIP during the period 1 January 1992 through 29 February 1992. The 20 December 1991 message also set forth the specific criteria for VSIP eligibility and provided the authority...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059910C070421
The applicant requests that he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) as a captain and that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) program benefits be restored. At the same time, the applicant stated that he also received a letter from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informing him that he could request resignation. As a matter of justice and exception to policy, his 9 September 1998 discharge from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496
It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009778
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program with entitlement to the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI)/Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant submitted the following documentary evidence in support of his request: a. a DA Form 4187, dated 26 February 1992, in which he requested voluntary separation under the provisions of Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 92-85. The...