Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066395C070402
Original file (2002066395C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 18 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066395

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: That the FSM signed up for the SBP when he retired and premiums were withheld from his retirement check every month and continued in force after their legal separation/divorce. She is listed in item 10, section III of the Survivor Benefit Plan – Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. The FSM did not indicate that he cancelled or intended to cancel the SBP or remove her name as beneficiary following their divorce or anytime prior to his death.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He entered the Regular Army on 13 February 1954. He and the applicant married on 24 January 1966. He retired on 1 March 1974. At that time, he completed a DD Form 1883 electing to participate in the SBP for spouse and children coverage, full base amount.

On 12 July 1977, the applicant and the FSM divorced. A decree of divorce A Mensa Et Thoro (not a final divorce) was granted. On 8 January 1985, a final decree of divorce was granted. Neither decree mentioned the SBP.

The FSM died on 8 November 1998.

Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Elections are made by category, not by name, and are irrevocable except under certain circumstances or as authorized by law.

Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

Public Law 98-525, enacted 19 October 1984, provided that a former spouse could request a deemed election within one year of the court order requiring SBP to be established on the former spouse’s behalf provided the member agreed to provide coverage.

Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence of Government error in this case.

2. SBP elections are made by category (such as spouse, spouse and child, or former spouse), not by name. At the time of the FSM’s and the applicant’s initial divorce action in 1977, coverage for former spouses was not authorized. At the time of the final decree of divorce in 1985, state courts were not permitted to order SBP coverage without the member’s consent. Such a change would have had to have been a strictly voluntary action on the part of the FSM, which change the evidence of record shows he did not make. The applicant ceased to be an eligible SBP beneficiary upon their divorce.

3. It was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career. The applicant was married to the FSM for 8 years of his 20-year military career. The Board does not find that equity would be served by granting the applicant the relief requested.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__fne___ __bje___ __reb___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066395
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020418
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822

    Original file (20060012822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029

    Original file (20060016263C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009530C070208

    Original file (20040009530C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to show former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 21 September 2000. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058982C070421

    Original file (2001058982C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage. The divorce decree awarded the applicant a portion of the FSM’s retired pay (based upon 15 years of marriage); it did not award her the SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016598

    Original file (20080016598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020974

    Original file (20090020974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show: * the applicant is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits * the applicant is eligible to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay 2. The divorce decree indicated that the applicant was to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000508C070205

    Original file (20060000508C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. However, since the divorce decree provided for SBP former spouse coverage, the applicant was married to the FSM for the majority of his military career, and the applicant was unmarried at the time of his death (i.e., no possible spouse beneficiary), it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076503C070215

    Original file (2002076503C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was...