Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000508C070205
Original file (20060000508C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        17 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060000508


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Meixell                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Peter Fisher                  |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Rowland Heflin                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased
former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he
changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage to
former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states that neither she nor the FSM were aware of the
stipulation in the SBP regulation about making a deemed election within one
year after a divorce.  She contends they were not counseled about this at
the time the FSM executed his DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election
Certificate) or at his retirement.

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 14 December 2005; the FSM’s
death certificate; a divorce decree and marital settlement agreement; a
letter, dated 19 August 2005, from the Defense Finance and Accounting
Service (DFAS); a letter, dated 10 November 2005; a marriage certificate;
and a DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was born on 18 October 1946.  The FSM served on active duty in
the U.S. Marine Corps from 14 January 1964 to 12 January 1968 and was
transferred to the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve.  On 7 October 1978, the FSM
enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard.  He was ordered to active duty
on
25 June 1979 in the Active Guard Reserve and released from active duty on
24 June 1983.

2.  The FSM and the applicant married on 9 August 1980.

3.  The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-
year letter) is dated 7 February 1996.

4.  The FSM's DD Form 1883, dated 17 April 1996, shows he enrolled in the
RCSBP for spouse coverage, full base amount, option C.

5.  On 11 May 1996, the FSM was honorably discharged from the Florida Army
National Guard and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group.

6.  The FSM and the applicant divorced on 23 February 2001.  The marital
settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the divorce decree,
states, in pertinent part, “During the parties’ 20 year marriage the
Husband served
16 years in the U.S. Military and has acquired an interest in retired pay
including but not limited to the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan.
The Husband agrees to elect the “former spouse coverage” within 30 days of
the date of the entry of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage in
order to effectuate this property distribution.”

7.  The FSM died on 14 February 2005.  His death certificate shows he was
divorced.

8.  Records at DFAS show that no one is currently receiving the annuity.

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide
for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

10.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a
way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age
60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before
reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline
enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)
elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but
delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect
that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if
before age 60.

11.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection
Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former
spouses of retiring members.

12.  Public Law 98-94, enacted 24 September 1983, established former spouse
coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

13.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to
order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse
coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an
SBP election.

14.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions
of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person, incident to a
proceeding of divorce, to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse if
required by court order to do so.  Any such election must be written,
signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary
concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  If that
person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A)
permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an
election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that
an election may not be deemed to have been made
unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within
one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested
that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the
statutory one-year time limit.  However, since the divorce decree provided
for SBP former spouse coverage, the applicant was married to the FSM for
the majority of his military career, and the applicant was unmarried at the
time of his death (i.e., no possible spouse beneficiary), it would be
equitable to correct his records to show he requested to change his SBP
coverage to former spouse coverage in a timely manner.

BOARD VOTE:

JM_____  _PF_____  __RH____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by showing that the FSM made a written request to change his
RCSBP coverage to former spouse coverage on 1 March 2001, and the request
was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.

2.  The Board also recommends that the applicant be paid the SBP annuity
retroactive to 14 February 2005, the date of the FSM's death.



                                  ___John Meixell_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060000508                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061017                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007938

    Original file (20080007938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, who is the former spouse of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that the FSM elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and to elect former spouse coverage. The FSM had one year from the date of divorce to elect RCSBP for former spouse coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059331C070421

    Original file (2001059331C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 August 1998, the FSM and the applicant divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016598

    Original file (20080016598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009530C070208

    Original file (20040009530C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to show former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 21 September 2000. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003194

    Original file (20140003194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 October 2008, he made a spouse and children full coverage election with immediate coverage (option C) under the RCSBP. Public Law 99-661, enacted 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Accordingly, since the FSM elected spouse and child immediate full coverage and since he no longer had a spouse, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009743

    Original file (20120009743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity as a result of his death. The FSM twice elected "spouse" coverage while married to the applicant and he was required to make a former spouse election as per their divorce decree. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029

    Original file (20060016263C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022525

    Original file (20120022525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. There is no evidence that the FSM made any election. The FSM passed away on 26 October 2011 at the age of 52 and there is no evidence to show that the applicant or the FSM made a former spouse election under the SBP within 1 year of the divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014433

    Original file (20080014433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.