Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066390C070402
Original file (2002066390C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 18 APRIL 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066390

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was a victim of spouse abuse but was too ashamed to tell anyone about his situation. He states that he made excuses for the bruises he had and did not seek treatment for many of "her beatings.” He states that his wife was so violent that he feared for his life and suffered from "hypo-tension." He states that his wife stabbed him on one occasion and he was forced to seek medical treatment. He notes that just prior to departing AWOL (absent without leave) he was so afraid that she was going to kill him and so sought shelter with the only people he thought would help him, his family. He states that he subsequently was able to divorce his spouse and has received help from his church and support groups. He states that his emotional and physical abuse was the basis for his discharge and that it "was not out of disrespect to the military." He states because of the abuse, shame, and fear for his life he was unable to make "rational decisions at that time." In support of his request he submits extracts from his service medical records noting treatment for a stab wound and hypo-tension. The VA office in St. Louis made the service medical record copies from documents in their possession.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 31 January 1977, just days short of turning 18. He had 9 years of formal education and was not married at the time he entered active duty. He successfully completed training and served his initial tour of duty in Germany. By November 1978 he had been promoted to pay grade E-4. In September 1979 he was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas and in December 1980 was assigned to Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

Information in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) indicates that he married a 24 year old woman in Lawton, Oklahoma on 12 March 1982. The applicant was 23 years old at the time.

An undated medical treatment form notes that the applicant was seen by a healthcare provider for "concern of hypo-tension x 2 days." The applicant denied "any current medical problems." He was instructed to have his blood pressure checked for 5 days and to report for a follow-up consultation on 8 April 1982. Hypo-tension is abnormally low blood pressure.

At 1515 hours, on 29 June 1982, the applicant was punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) for failing to attend two accountability formations on 22 June 1982. His punishment included reduction to pay grade E-3, which was suspended for 60 days.

Medical treatment documents, provided by the applicant, indicate that he was treated for a laceration to his right forearm on or about 29 June 1982. The applicant reported to medical officials that he had been cut with a butcher knife "in [a] fight." No further details were recorded and his records did not contain a line of duty investigation. On 7 July 1982 he returned for medical treatment when the wound on his forearmed opened up. The applicant reported that the wound opened that morning when he was pulling on his boots.

On 7 September 1982 the applicant's suspended reduction to pay grade E-3 was vacated. Although the document vacating the suspension is in his OMPF there is no indication regarding the events which led his commander to vacate the reduction.

On 29 January 1983 the applicant was awarded his second Army Good Conduct Medal.

On 3 February 1983 the applicant departed AWOL. He was dropped from the roles of the Army on 4 March and on 23 March 1983 he returned to military control at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

On 23 March 1983 the applicant completed a record of emergency data form indicating he was single.

Documents associated with the applicant's administrative separation action were not in records available to the Board. However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates that he was discharged under conditions other than honorable on 20 April 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

Army Regulation 635-200 also states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

One of the medical documents, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, was dated in July 1980, prior to his marriage and assignment to Fort Sill.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the applicant's administrative separation is presumed to have been accomplished in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

2. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which supports his contention that he was a victim of spouse abuse, which he contends, was the basis for his AWOL period. The Board notes that the applicant indicated that he was no longer married when he returned to military control in March 1983 and yet still chose to request an administrative discharge rather than plead his case before a court-martial.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__FNE __ __BJE___ __REB__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066390
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020418
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03010-00

    Original file (03010-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” He was found fully fit for duty, and clinic for psychological testing. patient’s medical record. According to the as was “likely” thought to be “chronic and evaluation were diagnoses of somatization fit for duty, and the No on 16 OCTOBER psychological d. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, from USS Enterprise, dated 05 APR 1982, was sea_” Per this report documented results of a psychological evaluation per the request of the ship evaluation of a “possible life at examination at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005053

    Original file (20070005053.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005053 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests the removal of two DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings, Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 7 December 1977 and 6 June 1980 and the removal of "Absent Without Leave"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001139

    Original file (20150001139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She is the only former spouse of the FSM. A review of the FSM's records indicated the FSM elected former spouse coverage, naming the applicant as the beneficiary upon his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in election from "former spouse" coverage to "spouse" coverage on 9 April 2008 and that the former spouse (the applicant) concurred with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017644

    Original file (20080017644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant's former spouse filed a "deemed election for SBP coverage." Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he completed his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078424C070215

    Original file (2002078424C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he should have never been coded as a "No Show" for ANCOC. It states that a soldier who accepts a promotion with the condition that he or she must enroll in, and successfully complete, a specified NCOES course, and fails to meet those conditions, or is subsequently denied enrollment, or becomes an academic failure, or does not meet graduation requirements, or is declared a "No Show," will be reduced to the grade and rank held prior to the conditional promotion. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081987C070215

    Original file (2002081987C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board notes that the applicant was twice given a psychiatric examination by competent military medical authorities trained as psychiatrists. It appears to the Board that the evidence of record and evidence provided by the applicant show that most of his medical problems existed prior to his entry in the service (back pain as a result of falling out of a tree and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02681A

    Original file (BC-2004-02681A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's request to have his military records corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the SBP, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. The applicant’s sister, acting on his behalf, resubmitted a letter dated 2 December 2004, requesting reconsideration of the applicant’s application with documentation indicating the applicant has a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026031

    Original file (20100026031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 10 November 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. However, the evidence of record shows the review team specifically examined the applicant's test results and determined the specimen was legally sufficient and scientifically supportable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027411

    Original file (20100027411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 2 February 1984, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 9, due to alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. There is no evidence in the available records to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023980

    Original file (20100023980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.