Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001139
Original file (20150001139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:  15 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001139 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.

2.  The applicant states she and the FSM were married from 1963 to 1982.  After a period of divorce, they remarried in 2008 and remained married until his death in 2014.  She is the only former spouse of the FSM.  She was both the spouse and the former spouse and the denial of the SBP annuity is a clear injustice. 

3.  The applicant provides –

* letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
* Her letter to DFAS
* 1963 marriage certificate
* 1982 divorce decree
*  2008 marriage certificate
* FSM's death certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Following prior active service in the U. S. Air Force, the FSM enlisted in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) on 23 January 1984.  

2.  He and Sandra, the applicant, were married on 23 November 1963 and they divorced on 2 July 1982.
2.  The FSM served through multiple reenlistments or extensions and he attained the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

3.  In connection with his upcoming retirement, the FSM completed a DA Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 3 February 2000.  In Item 13 he listed Sandra as his "Former Spouse."  He elected spouse only SBP coverage at the full gross pay amount.  Item 23 (Date of Marriage) and item 24 (Place of Marriage both show "NA."

4. A DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 3 February 2000, shows in:

	a.  item 6 (Are you Married):  "No"

	b.  Item 8 (Check one of the following to indicate the type of coverage you desire): He checked Spouse only and wrote in "(Former Spouse).

	c.  Item 9 He indicated he wanted full coverage under Option C (Immediate Coverage).

	d.  Item 10 (Name of Spouse) he entered Sandra's name and indicated (Former Spouse).

5.  An NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he was honorably discharged effective 31 March 2000 due to attaining maximum allowable age.

6.  Orders 81-12, OKARNG, dated 21 March 2000, announced his was to be discharged from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army effective 31 March 2000. 

7.  He and Sandra remarried on 9 April 2008.

8.  The FSM died on 7 July 2014.  His death certificate shows he was married to the applicant at the time of death. 

9.  An email from the Army Retirement Services Office shows the FSM was paying SBP premiums for former spouse until 1 July 14.

10.  On 23 December 2014, DFAS officials notified the applicant that she was not entitled to an annuity as a spouse.  A review of the FSM's records indicated the FSM elected former spouse coverage, naming the applicant as the beneficiary upon his retirement.  The FSM had the option to change his SBP election from former spouse to spouse.  Once he remarried he ceased to have former spouse coverage under SBP.  

11.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

12.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant and the FSM were married on 23 November 1963 and they divorced on 2 July 1982.  He retired on 31 March 2000.  Prior to his retirement, the FSM elected to participate in the SBP with spouse only full coverage.  He indicated the beneficiary was his former spouse.

2.  He and the applicant were remarried on 9 April 2008.  However, there is no evidence he notified DFAS of his remarriage or that he requested a change to his SBP coverage from "former spouse to "spouse" coverage.  SBP elections are made by category, not by name.  

3.  He paid former spouse SBP premiums until 1 July 2014.  He died on 7 July 2014.

4.  Once the FSM and applicant were married in 2008, she was no longer his former spouse and no longer an eligible SBP beneficiary.  A change in SBP beneficiary would have had to have been a strictly voluntary action on the part of the applicant within 1 year of their re-marriage, which the evidence of record shows he did not make.

5.  Nevertheless, there is no evidence the FSM was remarried to any other individual.  Additionally, he continued to pay SBP premiums until his death.  Given his remarriage to the applicant and continuation of SBP premium payments through the date of death, it is clear he intended to provide an annuity for the applicant.  

6.  Therefore, his records should be corrected as recommended below. 


BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  __X______  __X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  showing the FSM made a voluntary change in election from "former spouse" coverage to "spouse" coverage on 9 April 2008 and that the former spouse (the applicant) concurred with his election; 

	b.  showing his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner; and

	c.  paying the applicant the SBP annuity retroactive to the day after the FSM's death.



      ___________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022330



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001139



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009572

    Original file (20080009572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 March 1993, the FSM and his spouse, the applicant were divorced. He did not do so, and although the applicant provided copies of letters that show she did make a request for a deemed election of the SBP for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law, there is no indication that these letters were received by DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001313

    Original file (20090001313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 25 years, 18 of which were during his military service and that upon his retirement, he elected spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant contends that the records of her former spouse should be corrected to show that her request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage under the SBP was timely received and properly processed by officials at DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002143

    Original file (20090002143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant married the FSM in "1995," but he did not inform DFAS within a year of the marriage, so the applicant was not eligible. DFAS issued the applicant two payments which were later collected because she was not entitled to an SBP annuity because the FSM was not married at the time of his retirement and had not elected coverage for her within one year of their marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022330

    Original file (20130022330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After a period of divorce, they remarried in 2010 and remained married until his death in 2013. A review of the FSM's records indicated the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP upon his retirement in 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in election from "former spouse and child" coverage to "spouse and child" coverage on 1 June 2010 (the first day of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015572

    Original file (20080015572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 2006, the Board denied the applicant’s request for correction of the FSM’s records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse within one year of their divorce. The Board further informed the applicant that should DFAS determine that the FSM’s second spouse is not eligible for the FSM’s SBP annuity, or the applicant can provide irrefutable evidence that the second spouse was not married to the FSM prior to 7 March 2005, she was encouraged to submit a request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018659

    Original file (20080018659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2000, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. The Separation and Property Settlement Agreement to the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage ordered the FSM to maintain the applicant as the beneficiary of his SBP election; that is, he was ordered to change his SBP coverage from spouse only to former spouse. On 7 June 2004, the applicant filed a request with DFAS for, in effect, a deemed election changing SBP coverage from spouse only to former spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009701

    Original file (20080009701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication that the FSM informed DFAS of his divorce or that the FSM made an election to change SBP coverage from 'spouse" to former spouse" within one year of the date of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017003

    Original file (20070017003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from “spouse” to “former spouse” coverage. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct the FSM's records to show he changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage after their divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...