| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Paul A. Petty | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank (DOR) for lieutenant colonel (LTC) be corrected from 6 February 2001 to 15 December 2000.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to LTC in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position on 6 February 2001 with a DOR of 6 February 2001. His date of maximum time-in-grade (MTIG) as a major (MAJ) for promotion to LTC was 15 December 2000. Army Regulation 135-155,
paragraph 4-21d, states that for an AGR officer selected for promotion, the
DOR will be the date the officer attained MTIG or the date on which the officer is assigned to a position in the higher grade, whichever is earlier.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was a MAJ with a DOR of
16 December 1993, serving in an AGR major’s position in the 90th Reserve Support Command (RSC) since 28 April 1999. His MTIG date as a MAJ for promotion to LTC was 15 December 2000. He was selected for promotion to LTC by the 1999 Department of the Army Reserve Components Mandatory Promotion Selection Board that convened on 8 September 1999, adjourned on
8 October 1999, and whose recommendations were approved on 12 April 2000. On 6 February 2001, the applicant was assigned to a LTC AGR position in the 90th RSC as a result of a unit realignment and position reclassification. On
6 February 2001, the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) issued a promotion memorandum promoting the applicant to LTC with an effective date of 6 February 2001, and a DOR of 6 February 2001.
5. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U. S. Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21d, states, “AGR officers selected by a mandatory board will be promoted provided they are assigned/attached to a position in the higher grade. An AGR officer who is selected for promotion by a mandatory promotion board, but who is not assigned/attached to a position in the higher grade will be promoted on the date of assignment/attachment to a higher graded position or the day after release from AGR status. The date of rank (DOR) will be the date the officer attained maximum TIG (MTIG) or the date on which assigned/attached to a position in the higher grade, whichever is earlier.” The MTIG for promotion to LTC is 7 years as a MAJ. Pay and allowances are paid at the new rank based on the effective date. Time in grade for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade is calculated from the DOR. Adjustment of the DOR does not authorize additional pay or allowances.
6. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, St. Louis, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant’s DOR should be adjusted to
15 December 2000. The applicant was provided a copy of this opinion but has not provided any rebuttal.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The date of the applicant’s MTIG as a MAJ for promotion to a LTC was
15 December 2000. He was selected for promotion to LTC prior to that date. He was promoted to LTC on 6 February 2001, the date he was assigned to an AGR LTC position. According to regulation and the advisory opinion, his DOR for LTC should be corrected to the date of his MTIG, 15 December 2000, with an effective date of 6 February 2001.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected for the individual concerned by showing that his DOR for LTC is 15 December 2000, with an effective date of 6 February 2001.
BOARD VOTE:
__sk____ ___to___ ___jm____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Stanley Kelley___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066317 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020606 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 102.07 – Date of Rank |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029934
The applicant is a current member of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), on active duty in the AGR Program. The applicant provides: a. The evidence of record does not support the existence of vacant AGR O-5 positions within his proximity of assignment at the 90th RRC that he could have been reassigned to at the time the FY08 LTC AGR Promotion Selection Board results were approved.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019825
He contends that as an ARNG AGR officer, he was authorized DORs determined as follows in accordance with (IAW) paragraphs 4-15 and 4-19d of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), effective 1 October 1994 for his promotion to MAJ and 1 February 1998 for his promotion to LTC as follows: a. Paragraph 4-15 provides that the Promotion Eligibility Date (PED) is the date the officer meets the eligibility criteria for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073123C070403
Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board notes the applicant's contention that his DOR's for CPT and LTC should be adjusted based on his CSC awarded at appointment. Since his DOR for MAJ has been corrected to 6 June 1991, he is also eligible for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004679C070208
Memorandum, Headquarters, US Army Reserve Command, dated 21 January 1997, promoting the applicant to MAJ effective 23 May 1996. c. Memorandum, US Army Human Resources Command – St. Louis, dated 2 March 2004, promoting the applicant to LTC effective 21 February 2004. d. Orders M-050-0004, Headquarters, 94th RSC, dated 19 February 2003, involuntarily mobilizing the applicant for 1 year effective 24 February 2003. e. Copy of 10 U.S.C. The advisory opinion points out that the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014403
Because his DOR to MAJ was not annotated on the order announcing Federal recognition, he did not appear before the LTC selection board until 2005 and he was selected for promotion with an effective date of 18 January 2006. c. Because of the error in his DOR for MAJ, his DOR for LTC is also incorrect and should be 30 June 2004. The official noted that his DOR to MAJ was corrected by NGB Special Orders Number 177 AR (Extract) to reflect his maximum time in grade (TIG) as a CPT as required by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015137
The evidence of record shows he assumed an LTC position on 1 June 2011; therefore, his DOR should be corrected to that date. The evidence of record shows he was extended Federal recognition effective 27 March 2012; therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his effective date of promotion to an earlier date. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending NGB Special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066258C070421
The opinion also stated that since the applicant met the time in grade (TIG) requirement on 25 June 1999, it is recommended that he be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 25 June 1999, and an effective date of 3 January 2000. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084771C070212
The effective date and date of promotion of non-unit USAR officers will be no earlier than the approval date of the board, the date of Senate confirmation (if required), or the date the officer meets MYIG, whichever is later [emphasis added]. The opinion stated that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the 1999 DA Reserve Components Selection Board with a promotion eligibility date of 23 February 2000, and was subsequently promoted by promotion memorandum, dated 9 May 2000,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020934
His order for his assignment to full-time active guard/reserve (AGR) duty effective 1 October 2012, the time of the board. c. An OKNG memorandum, dated 11 October 2011, approved his request to remain on the standing list until assigned to a higher graded position of released from active duty under Title 32. d. Orders 154-017, OKNG, dated 3 June 2013, show he was promoted to MAJ with DOR of 24 August 2012. The advisory official recommended granting the applicant's request by adjusting his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020856
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of major (MAJ) from 2 August 2010 to 29 September 2008. While he should have been promoted to the rank of MAJ on 1 August 2010 instead of 2 August 2010, he has not provided evidence to show he should have been promoted 29 September 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to the rank of...