| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to general.
APPLICANT STATES: That his undesirable discharge is unjust because the Army was fully aware of the hardship conditions he was experiencing at home with his mother’s grave illnesses (diabetes and mental disorder). He states, in effect, that initially he requested a compassionate reassignment to be closer to his ill mother, which was granted. He also contends that he applied for a hardship discharge on four or five occasions. He goes on to state that he went absent without leave (AWOL) for all the right reasons (to care for his ill mother) and only after he fulfilled his obligation in Vietnam. In support of his application, he submits a letter, dated 7 December 2001; and an undated attachment to his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted on 29 December 1967. He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was transferred to Vietnam for duty as a radio operator. He served in Vietnam from 18 June 1968 through 15 June 1969.
The applicant’s military records show that he went AWOL on 11 November 1969 and returned to military control on 20 October 1975.
There is no charge sheet in the available records. The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are also not contained in the available records.
On 22 October 1975, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He acknowledged that he was guilty of the charge(s) against him or lesser included offense(s), that he understood he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate; and that he would be deprived of many or all Army benefits. He also acknowledged that he may be ineligible for many or all Army benefits administered by the Veterans Administration; that he may be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law; and that he may expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life because of an undesirable discharge. The applicant elected to submit a statement in his own behalf; however, this statement is not contained in the available records.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 17 November 1975 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of court-martial. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 9 days of total active service with 2132 days lost due to AWOL.
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge.
On 20 October 1978, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable or general.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge, may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he applied for a hardship discharge on four or five occasions. However, there is no record of evidence available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support this contention.
2. The Board noted the applicant’s claim of family problems which led to his decision to go AWOL. However, these matters are not grounds for upgrading his discharge.
3. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
4. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation appear to be appropriate.
5. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included 2132 days of lost time and determined that his service was not satisfactory. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a general discharge.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
FNE____ BJE_____ REB_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002066293 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020418 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19751117 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 Chapter 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | For the good of the service |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019184
On 13 February 1975, the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations). On 18 March 1975, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He did not make a statement to that effect at the time he submitted his request for discharge and he has not provided any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018612
Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his Undesirable Discharge (UD) be upgraded.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060048C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The request was denied. The applicant’s records were thoroughly searched, but failed to show any documented evidence other than the applicant’s statement to support his allegation that he was to receive a hardship discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005594
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 February 1970, the applicant's mother wrote to the President of the United States concerning her son. On 21 June 1974, the applicant was given an undesirable discharge under Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, by reason of discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021175
The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states that when he got out of the hospital in Vietnam, he applied for and he was granted leave to go home. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063170C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070819C070402
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Charges were preferred against the applicant on 27 December 1976 for being AWOL from 30 October 1972 to 24 December 1976. However, in addition to his service in Vietnam from 8 November 1970 until he was granted emergency leave on 21 December 1970, the Board also reviewed his record of service which included 2084 days of lost time due to AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006944C070205
On 28 June 1972, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. On 13 June 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 13 July 1972 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002954
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 20 April 1972, for 2 years. There is no evidence the applicant requested a hardship discharge during his period of service. However, his records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 21 December 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), Chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial with an Undesirable Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004271C070206
Records show the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for upgrade of his discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The period of service under consideration includes 94 days of AWOL and separation with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.