| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. P. A. Castle | Analyst |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he went absent without leave (AWOL) when his request for leave to see his seriously ill mother in the hospital was denied. He states his first sergeant told him if he went AWOL and returned he could obtain a hardship discharge. He claims he was discharged without being given a choice or able to be present and that he just recently obtained a copy of his discharge papers and saw that he was not given a hardship discharge as he had thought.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted for 4 years on 29 August 1975, and upon completion of basic and advanced training in March 1976, he was assigned to Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, as a wheel vehicle mechanic.
In December 1976, the applicant received a letter of commendation for his outstanding performance of duty during a Brave Shield exercise. In February 1977, he received another letter of appreciation for his work during an exercise.
On 10 February 1977, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for wrongful use of provoking words. His punishment consisted of a reduction in grade to E-2, a forfeiture in pay and extra duty.
In June 1977, the applicant began the first of two periods of AWOL. On 16 September 1977, charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 27 June to 31 August 1977 and 2 September to 11 September 1977. The applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request acknowledged he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge which he might receive. He indicated he understood he could be denied some or all veterans' benefits as a result of his discharge and that he may be deprived of rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law. He did not submit any statements on his own behalf.
Although the applicant's unit and battalion commanders recommended disapproval, the separation authority approved the request and directed that an undesirable discharge be issued. On 7 October 1977, the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He had 1 year and 10 months, and 23 days of creditable service and 76 days lost time.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 25 March 1980. The request was denied. However, this Board notes that at that time the applicant said he started going AWOL because he was being picked on; required to do dirty things that no one else had to do; and the noncommissioned officers (NCO) were unfair to him.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s records were thoroughly searched, but failed to show any documented evidence other than the applicant’s statement to support his allegation that he was to receive a hardship discharge.
3. The applicant applied for, signed and consulted with counsel on his request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of a trial by court-martial.
4. The applicant’s contention that he went AWOL because his mother was seriously ill, is in contradiction to the 1980 application to the ADRB where he states he went AWOL because he was sick of the unfair treatment he was receiving.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___gp __ __tap ___ ___mm__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001060048 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/21 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1977/10/07 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | For the Good of the Service |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070819C070402
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Charges were preferred against the applicant on 27 December 1976 for being AWOL from 30 October 1972 to 24 December 1976. However, in addition to his service in Vietnam from 8 November 1970 until he was granted emergency leave on 21 December 1970, the Board also reviewed his record of service which included 2084 days of lost time due to AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. On 5 October 1970 the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067815C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002067815SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20020919TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE19800711DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, Chap 10 DISCHARGE REASONA60.00BOARD DECISION(DENY)REVIEW AUTHORITYISSUES...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010821C071029
In the request the applicant submitted to the Board originally, he stated he was supposed to be discharged for medical reasons because of a back injury from a motorcycle accident, and that he was, at the time, trying to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. A copy of a DA Form 31, Request and Authority for Leave, in the applicant's service record shows he was allowed to go on excess leave pending approval of his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001933C070206
He also states, in effect, that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable or at least a general discharge due to the following: (1) his ability to serve was impaired by his youth and immaturity, and his mother’s ill health and hospitalization; (2) he requested a compassionate reassignment but was unfairly told to forget it; (3) his nonjudicial punishment was only an isolated offense; (4) his conduct and efficiency ratings and proficiency marks were mostly pretty good; (5) he has been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. The applicant further stated that after he had been denied a hardship discharge twice he saw no alternative but to go home and assist his family.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021040
The separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that his service be characterized as under other than honorable conditions. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 9 December 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066294C070403
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge. On 20 October 1978, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable or general.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001225C070205
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He states that his recruiter lied to him about being able to have the government relocate his family with him at his first duty station. A punitive discharge is authorized for offenses under Article 86, for periods of AWOL in excess of 30 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011316C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he requested a hardship discharge. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he applied for an upgrade of his discharge to the ADRB within its 15-year statute of limitations.