| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the entry "Hardship" instead of "Pregnancy," and that she receive her education benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: That she was informed that her narrative reason for separation would be "Hardship" and was informed that under hardship she would be entitled to Veterans Administration (VA) benefits. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her DD Form 214.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records show:
She enlisted on 4 April 1991, as a multichannel communications systems operator, for a period of 4 years.
On 13 January 1992, the applicant submitted a formal personnel actions request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, for pregnancy. She also requested that she remain on active duty unit 1 June 1992.
The applicant’s request was processed and approved by the appropriate authority on 16 January 1992, who directed issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
On 30 March 1992, the applicant requested withdrawal of her approved discharge for pregnancy, which was denied.
The applicant was discharged on 1 June 1992, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, due to pregnancy. She had a total of 1 year, 1 month, and 28 days of creditable service.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for a change in her narrative reason for separation on 26 December 2001. The ADRB determined that her discharge was proper and equitable and denied her request for a change in her narrative reason for separation on 8 March 2002.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 8 of that regulation pertains to separation of enlisted women-pregnancy. Chapter 6 provides for the separation of personnel because of genuine dependency or hardship. Separation under this chapter is for the convenience of the government. An application for such separation will be approved when a service member can substantiate that his/her situation or immediate family’s situation has been aggravated to an excessive degree since enlistment, that the condition is not temporary, and that discharge will improve the situation.
Paragraph 6-3b, provides for the separation due to hardship. A hardship exists when, in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of the soldier's (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship.
The Education Incentive Branch of the US Total Army Personnel Command has established policy relating to early separation for the Convenience of the Government. The policy is that certain narrative reasons for separation describe something other than Convenience of the Government, but, in fact, are separations for the Convenience of the Government. The most common paragraphs in Army Regulation 635-200, which fall into this category, are 5-3 (usually Convenience of the Government), 5-4 (surviving family members), 5-8 and 6-3b(1) or (2) (Parenthood), 5-17 (Early Separation to Further Education), Chapter 8 (Pregnancy), paragraph 16-2 (ROTC) and 16-12 (Holiday Early Transition Program). The Education Incentive Branch has also determined that separation for parenthood is not considered hardship for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) purposes, but is a Convenience of the Government separation as stated in Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-1.
The GI Bill, as outlined in Title 38, United States Code, chapter 30, section 1411b, provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June 1985 to contribute $1,200.00 to the program during their first 12 months of service. Participation in the program is automatic, unless the soldier voluntarily withdraws from the program at the time of processing into the Army at a reception station. Under normal situations, the $1,200.00 contribution is nonrefundable. The program is administered by the VA after the soldier is separated from active duty.
Under VA regulations, service members must serve at least 20 months of a service obligation of less than 3 years, or 30 months of a service obligation of
3 years or longer to be eligible to qualify for the MGIB. There are only four exceptions: 1) a discharge for a service-connected disability; 2) a hardship discharge; 3) a discharge for a pre-existing medical condition; or, 4) an involuntary separation due to reduction in force. In all cases, the soldier's service must be considered fully honorable.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, for pregnancy. This separation was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. Accordingly, her DD Form 214 properly reflects the appropriate narrative reason for separation.
2. Based on policy and guidance in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 8, for pregnancy is not considered a hardship discharge for MGIB
purposes, but is considered a separation for the Convenience of the Government
3. The applicant is not eligible for the VA benefits under the MGIB based on the fact that she did not complete at least 30 months of her enlistment and did not meet the exception criteria.
4. The Board notes the applicant's contentions that she was informed that her separation would be "Hardship" and that under hardship she would be entitled to VA benefits. However, there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support her contentions.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__iw___ ___tl___ ___ao_____ DENY APPLICATION
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002065462 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020827 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19920601 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, chap 8 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 191 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082703C070215
On 7 December 1998, the applicant's commander initiated action to separate the applicant for involuntary separation due to parenthood under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-8. The applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates in block 15a that she did not contribute to the Post-Vietnam ERA Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was honorably discharged on 6 January 1999, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016434
During counseling she was informed of the options available to her and she elected separation for reasons of pregnancy per Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 8. Paragraph 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components serving on active duty or active duty for training may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002941
The applicant requests to change the narrative reason for her separation from "Pregnancy Discharge - Overseas Separation" to "Hardship." The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's separation were not available to the Board; however, the applicant's record contains Orders 118-6, issued by the 369th Personnel Service Company, dated 8 June 1988, which show she received an approved overseas separation and an approved chapter 8 (Separation of Enlisted Women for Pregnancy)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012013
The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of her previous request for change of the authority and narrative reason for her separation, from Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), Chapter 8 (Pregnancy) to Chapter 6 (Hardship). In its first consideration of this case, the Board concluded that evidence of record showed a properly constituted DD Form 214 that confirmed the applicant was released from active duty on 12 May 2000 under the provisions of Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019888
The available records do not show she requested a hardship discharge prior to release from active duty service. On 10 September 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty service due to pregnancy under Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8 and she was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve. _________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019506
The applicant requested and was granted separation due to pregnancy. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was honorably relieved from active duty and transferred the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8 with a narrative reason for separation of pregnancy. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that her separation should have been under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141
On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000392
The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 14 June 2005 be changed to Hardship instead of Secretarial Authority. Evidence of record shows the applicant applied to the ADRB for a narrative reason for separation change to hardship/dependency and he provided substantive evidence to support his request. Since the evidence of record shows that he should have been discharged due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060211C070421
On 7 February 2001, the applicant submitted a formal personnel action request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, paragraph 6-5, due to dependency of a family member. He stated in his request that the applicant’s son required special attention due to an automobile accident, was confined to a wheelchair, and required constant care and supervision. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of...