| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that two 2 Purple Hearts (PH) he earned be added to his records.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he is filing a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and being credited with the PHs he earned would assist the VA in making a final determination in regard to his entitlement to receive medical treatment and compensation benefits.
4. The applicant’s military records show that that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 October 1965. His was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantryman Fire Crewman) and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4 (SP4/E-4).
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that he was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and served with B Company,
4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division, from 22 April 1966 to
9 April 1967. Item 40 (Wounds) contains the entry “shrapnel wound right arm,
26 May 1966” that verifies he was wounded in action in the RVN.
6. In addition, the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a copy of General Orders Number 348, dated 16 October 1967, issued by Headquarters, 2nd Armor Division, Fort Hood, Texas, which awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), first award, for the period 17 October
1965 to 16 October 1967.
7. On 26 October 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of chapter 2, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of expiration of term of service. At the time of his separation he had completed a total of 2 years of active military service.
8. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to and authenticated by the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Bronze Star Medal; National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device; and Combat Infantryman Badge. The awards listed in this separation document do not include the PH or the PH
1st Oak Leaf Cluster.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes the policy for the Army awards program. Paragraph 2-8 contains the policy for awarding the PH and it states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Paragraph 2-8b(1) states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized for the first wound suffered, but for each subsequent award an oak leaf cluster will be awarded. Not more than one award will be made for more than one wound or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. The numerical listing of units in this publication confirms that the unit in which the applicant served in the RVN earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his assignment tenure.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he earned two PHs while serving in the RVN. However, the Board is only able to confirm his entitlement to one of these awards.
2. By regulation, in order to award the PH a member must have been wounded in action, must have been treated for the wound by military medical personnel, and this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. For each subsequent award of the PH will be made for more than one wound or injury not received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent.
3. The evidence of record confirms that on 26 May 1966, while serving as a private first class in the RVN, the applicant received a shrapnel wound to his right arm in action against the enemy. Therefore, the Board concludes the regulatory burden of proof has been satisfied in this case and the applicant should be awarded the PH at this time.
4. However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence to show the applicant was wounded in action a second time while serving in the RVN. Therefore, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support awarding a second PH or 1st Oak Leaf Cluster to the PH in this case.
5. In addition, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 October 1965 to 16 October 1967; however, this award was not included in the list of awards in his separation document. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to add this award to his DD Form 214 at this time.
6. The record also confirms that during his assignment tenure in the RVN, the unit in which he served was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Therefore, the Board also concludes that it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
7. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by: awarding him the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action on 26 May 1966, while serving as a private first class in the RVN; showing he earned the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable period of active military service from 17 October 1965 to 16 October 1967; showing he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for his unit service in the RVN; and providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these awards.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__RVO__ __RJW__ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065620 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | PARTIAL (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091150C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. These orders confirm that the applicant was awarded the PH, for being wounded in action on 9 September 1967. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006470C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006470 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his entitlement to a 2nd award of the Purple Heart (PH) and to a 5th award of the Air Medal (AM). As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087345C070212
The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not include the PH that he received for being wounded in action on 23 November 1967, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), or the CIB he was entitled to based on his service with an infantry unit. However, although the record confirms he served in and participated in combat action in the RVN with a qualifying infantry unit, it also verifies that while serving in this unit, he was assigned duties in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010411
Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following three campaigns: * Vietnam Defense Campaign (8 March - 24 December 1965) * Vietnam Counteroffensive (25 December 1965 - 30 June 1966) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967) c. Paragraph 6-3 states an oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the PH. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076090C070215
Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign participated in while serving in the RVN. Lacking any derogatory information on file and/or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, which would preclude him from receiving the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant served a qualifying period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103983C070208
It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The applicant provided no evidence and the evidence of record provides no information regarding the applicant being wounded in action a second time while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002678C071029
Randolph J. Flemings | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, he received the PH for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 21 January 1967, and asks for a full review of his records for any and all authorized awards that he earned and that any of these awards to which he is entitled be added to the list of awards on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089037C070403
These orders awarded the applicant the PH for wounds he received in action while serving as a SP4 in the RVN on 20 March 1967. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would disqualify him from receiving the AGCM, or a specific disqualification from any of the active duty unit commanders for whom he served, the Board finds that he is entitled to the first award of the AGCM based on his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 20 April 1966 through 19 April 1969. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062281C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart (PH). The SF 502 in the record clearly establishes that the applicant received a combat related injury while participating in action against the enemy in the RVN and that this injury was treated by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004980C070208
Diane J. Armstrong | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not reflect that he received the PH for being wounded while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no indication the applicant received a wound/injury as a direct result of, or that was caused by enemy action...