Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | ||
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | ||
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show he was awarded the PH. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 12 April 1971, and a copy of an Authorization for Issuance of Awards (DA Form 1577), dated 11 May 1992.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 3 August 1962, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and that he continuously served on active duty for
8 years and 15 days until being honorably discharged on 12 April 1971.
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Cook) and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5
(SGT/E-5). It also verifies that he served two tours in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), the first from 1 September 1965 to 12 November 1966 and the second from 22 November 1967 to 18 November 1968.
6. The applicant’s DA Form 20 also shows that during his assignments in the RVN he participated in 6 campaigns and that he earned the following awards: Bronze Star Medal; Army Commendation Medal; National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal; and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with 60 Device. However, block 40 (Wounds) is blank and has no entry or remarks that would indicate that he was ever wounded or injured in action.
7. A Clinical Record Narrative Summary (Standard Form 502) on file indicates that on 16 March 1966, the applicant received a sprain of his coccyx. It also confirms that this injury was incurred on 16 March 1966, when the applicant fell from a helicopter while it was crashing while he was participating in a search and destroy mission in the RVN. In addition, this form confirms that the applicant was treated for this combat related injury at the 93rd Evacuation Hospital in the RVN from 16 March to 29 March 1966.
8. On 11 May 1992, Department of the Army authorized the issuance of the PH to the applicant in a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) published by the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, Missouri.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member wounded or killed while engaged in action against an armed enemy or hostile force.
10. Paragraph 2-8b (2) defines a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent while engaged in action against the enemy. It also specifically states that in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record.
11. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign participated in while serving in the RVN and that a silver service star is authorized to be used in lieu of 5 bronze service stars.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the RVN. This document confirms that units with which the applicant served earned the following awards during his assignment tenure: Presidential Unit Citation; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound or injury was received while participating in an action against the enemy and that it required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment of the wound or injury for which the PH is being awarded also must have been made a matter of official record.
2. The SF 502 in the record clearly establishes that the applicant received a combat related injury while participating in action against the enemy in the RVN and that this injury was treated by military medical officials and was made a matter of official record. Therefore, the Board finds the evidence satisfies the regulatory criteria for award of the PH and it concludes that it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
3. In addition, the Board finds that the evidence of record confirms the applicant’s entitlement to the following awards based on his unit service and campaign participation in the RVN: Presidential Unit Citation; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation; in addition, to 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star for his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board concludes it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his records at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart based on his being injured in action while serving as a private first class in the RVN on 16 March 1966; by showing he earned 1 silver service star and
1 bronze service star for his Vietnam Service Medal; by showing he earned the following awards for his unit service in the RVN: Presidential Unit Citation; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation; and by providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.
BOARD VOTE:
__JLP __ _ _CJP __ __KWL GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Jennifer L. Prater__
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2001062281 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/17 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | ( GRANT) |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016181C080407
He states that he also served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) as an infantryman and was wounded, and he feels he deserves a second award of the CIB for this combat service in the RVN. The applicant's record also shows that during his RVN tour, he was awarded the Air Medal and a second award of the BSM, which were not included on his final DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011439
He also requests his DD Form 214 show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and any other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no additional orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH for being wounded in action in 1966. Further, his record and separation document confirms he was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in 1969, and a second award of the PH is not included...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004103C070206
The applicant provides award recommendations for the awards in question from senior medic who served with him in the RVN. In this case, the evidence of record includes no indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured in action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound/injury. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014184C080407
He claims to have been wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in January 1968, but never awarded the PH. No PH orders pertaining to the applicant were in this file. The applicant's record is also void of any medical treatment records showing that he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury while serving in the RVN, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 24 of either of the DD Forms 214 he was issued, both of which he authenticated with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074713C070403
The record shows that applicant was awarded the PH for wounds received in connection with military operations against a hostile force on 17 December 1967. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH for wounds received on 17 December 1967. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action on 26 December 1967, while serving as a captain in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943
Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010173C070208
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 18 July 1967 through 26 November 1967. Item 40 his DA Form 20 contains no entry indicating he was ever wounded in action and there are no orders or other documents on file in his MPRJ showing he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority. Item 41 of his DA Form 20 does not include the PH in the list of awards he earned while serving on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004921C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004921 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069889C070402
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any award recommendations, orders, or other documents that would indicate the applicant was recommended for, awarded, or entitled to receive the CIB, PH, BSM, or SS. The Parachutist Badge, CIB, PH, BSM, and SS were not included in this list of authorized awards included in the separation document. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant successfully completed the basic airborne course, and as a result was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002088C070208
The DD Form 214 he was issued on this date shows no additional awards earned and does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The evidence does shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation,...