| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member |
2. The applicant request, in effect, that he be awarded 2 Purple Hearts (PH) for being wounded in action on two separate occasions.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 25 December 1967 and on 16 April 1968, which should entitle him to be awarded the PH and the PH with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC). In support of his application, he submits the following documents: U.S. Field Medical Card (DD Form 1380), dated 25 December 1967; DD Form 1380, dated 16 April 1968; and a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 June 1967. His was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Intelligence Specialist) and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4 (SP4/E-4).
5. The applicant’s record confirms that he was assigned to the RVN and served with B Troop, 1st Battalion, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, as a scout observer, from 20 November 1967 to 16 November 1968.
6. On 13 June 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of chapter 2, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of expiration of term of service. At the time of his separation he had completed a total of 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service.
7. On the date of his separation, the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 that he authenticated with his signature. This document shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device; and Combat Infantryman Badge. The awards listed in this separation document do not include the PH or the PH 1st OLC.
8. The applicant’s medical record contains a copy of a DD Form 1380 (US Field Medical Card), dated 25 December 1967, that confirms that he was treated by military medical personnel for grenade fragment wounds to his right shoulder, which he received in action against the enemy in the RVN on 25 December 1967. There is also a second DD Form 1380 on file that verifies he was also treated by military medical personnel for shrapnel wounds to his armpit, which he received in action against the enemy in the RVN on 16 April 1968.
9. The applicant’s record is void of any derogatory information or a specific disqualification from any unit commander for which he served that would preclude him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes the policy for the Army awards program. Paragraph 2-8 contains the policy for awarding the PH and it states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Paragraph 2-8b(1) states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized for the first wound suffered, but for each subsequent award an oak leaf cluster will be awarded. Not more than one award will be made for more than one wound or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent.
11. Chapter 4 of the awards regulation provides guidance on awarding the AGCM and it states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It also specifies that for the first award only, a period of more than 1 year is a qualifying period for the award at the termination of a period of Federal service. While award of the AGCM is not automatic, current policy requires that a disqualification must be justified.
12. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to United States Army Vietnam or Military Assistance Command Vietnam and its subordinate units from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. By regulation, in order to award the PH a member must have been wounded in action, must have been treated for the wound by military medical personnel, and this treatment must have made a matter of official record.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was twice treated by military medical personnel for wounds received in action against the enemy in the RVN. Therefore, the Board concludes, given the regulatory burden of proof has been satisfied in this case, that it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Purple Heart and the Purple Heart 1st Oak Leaf Cluster and to add these awards to his records at this time.
3. The evidence of record also confirms that the applicant served a qualifying period of service that entitles him to receive the AGCM. Given his record is void of any derogatory information or a specific disqualification from any of the unit commanders for which he served, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to add the AGCM to his record at this time.
4. In addition, based on his service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to receive the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Board finds it would also be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by: awarding him the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action on 25 December 1967, while serving as a private first class in the RVN; awarding him the Purple Heart 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, for being wounded in action on 16 April 1968, while serving as a specialist four in the RVN; awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable period of active military service from 15 June 1967 to 13 June 1969; adding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his records based on his unit service in the RVN; and providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE__ __MKP__ ___LE___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_____Fred N. Eichorn____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062695 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/07 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013351
The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should reflect a second award of the PH and he was never awarded the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) as he should have been. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 contains one entry showing he was wounded in action in the RVN on 28 April 1968, when he received a fragment wound to his left leg. However, there are no record entries or orders confirming the applicant was wounded in action a second time, or that he was ever recommended for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004174
Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for being wounded in action in the RVN on 28 March 1968 and to add the entry PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) to item 24 of his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010066
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003334
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was WIA on a third occasion, or any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the PH (2nd OLC). c. The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013043
Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 November 1966 through 26 September 1968. The evidence also confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, he is eligible for the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013801
The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 2 July 1967 through 24 April 1968. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 23 May 1966 through 22 May 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105434C070208
In this case, the evidence of record includes orders awarding the applicant the first award of the PH for being wounded in action on 26 June 1967. Thus, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, for being wounded in action in the RVN on 6 December 1967 and to correct his record and separation document to show he received two awards of the PH. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015238
During its original review of the applicant's request for the PH, the Board found no evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017868
As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 November 1965 through 28 September 1968. As a result, absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows he was awarded the BSM with oak leaf cluster while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011335
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 December 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011335 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action or recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 27 May 1966 through 25 December 1968, and to add this award to...