| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be amended to add the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in action on 15 November 1969. He provides a letter from his commander at that time who substantiates his contention that he was wounded on 15 November 1969.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army on 26 March 1968. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
5. The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Company A, 2d Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Infantry Brigade on 6 March 1969. He departed Vietnam on 14 February 1970. He was released from active duty on 20 February 1970. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal, and the Marksmanship Badge Rifle M-14. His Enlisted Qualification Record, DA Form 20, shows that his conduct and efficiency had been rated as excellent throughout his service.
6. The letter provided by the applicant’s company commander states that the company came under attack when it went to the rescue of a downed resupply helicopter on 15 November 1969. The company successfully defended the area around the downed helicopter with only one casualty – the applicant. He was evacuated to the aid station and was later returned to the company. The commander understood that the medic at the aid station had taken care of all the paperwork necessary to award the applicant the Purple Heart. The commander’s statement is corroborated from his own award citation.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
8. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal
military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award
only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier’s conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 2d Battalion, 1st Infantry was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the period 11 – 31 August 1969 and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 24 August – 31 December 1969. It also shows that Company A, 2d Battalion, 1st Infantry was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the period 13 May – 1 June 1969.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The statements of individuals are normally inadequate as the sole basis for an award of the Purple Heart because they do not fulfill the regulatory requirement that there be a record of medical treatment. However, in this case, the supporting statement from the applicant’s former company commander is credible evidence that the applicant did in fact receive the wounds claimed and was treated by competent battlefield medical personnel.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant met the award criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The evidence of record also shows that his battalion was awarded the Valorous Unit Award and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and his company was awarded the Valorous Unit Award during a period of time he was assigned to the units and so he is entitled to those awards, also.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received on 15 November 1969 and the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 March 1968 – 20 February 1970.
2. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to add the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two awards of the Valorous Unit Award.
BOARD VOTE:
__fne___ __wtm___ __cjp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065251 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020502 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072439C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It provided for award of the Purple Heart to any member of an Armed Force who was wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States. Although the VA awarded the applicant service connection for residuals of shrapnel wounds to his left arm and left leg, the Rating Decision noted that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070745C070402
Since the applicant’s name appears on the list of casualties wounded in Vietnam, and his Enlisted Qualification Record contains an entry validating his wounding, it is apparent that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on 8 March 1969 and is entitled to have it reflected on his DD Form 214. Furthermore, based on his excellent performance of duty and his promotion to the rank of sergeant in only two years of service, it would be appropriate to recognize his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081695C070215
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Review of these records did not reveal any General Orders authorizing the applicant an award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075040C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart and to correct his date of entry on active duty. The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam and has a certificate awarding him the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded two awards of the Air Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087770C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart as a result of wounds sustained in combat in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of six months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074996C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087007C070212
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072741C070403
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by General Orders (GO) 75, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division and the Purple Heart First Oak Leaf Cluster by GO 76, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division. The applicant's DA Form 20, item 41 shows he was awarded the CIB by Special Orders 205, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division (the date is not given). That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006625C070208
According to the award certificate provided by the applicant, he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, as an individual award on 1 August 1969. Evidence in the applicant’s service medical records indicate that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action and as such would have been entitled to an award of the Purple Heart. While the applicant does not have approval documents from the Commanding General of United States Army Vietnam to wear his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073360C070403
12. Review of the applicant’s records further reveals eligibility for award of four bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal, the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, two awards of the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. General Orders show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device; therefore, he is entitled to...