| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | ||
| Mr. William D. Barr | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be amended to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Medal, First Class, Unit Citation; the Meritorious Unit Commendation; two bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal; the Army Good Conduct Medal; and the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that the Veterans Administration (VA) Rating Decision he provides documents shrapnel wounds to his left arm and left leg. He provides the Rating Decision and his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, as supporting evidence.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army on 26 January 1966. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
5. The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Company C, 2d Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division from 16 March 1967 – 19 April 1967 and to Headquarters, 2d Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division from 20 April 1967 – 10 January 1968. He departed Vietnam on 11 January 1968 after being credited with two campaigns.
6. The applicant was released from active duty on 14 January 1968 after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 19 days of creditable active service. His Enlisted Qualification Record, DA Form 20, item 38 shows that his conduct and efficiency were rated as excellent throughout his service. Item 40, Wounds, does not show that he received any wounds. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and one overseas bar.
7. On 14 June 1968, the VA awarded the applicant service connection for residuals of shrapnel wounds to his left arm and left leg. The Rating Decision noted that the available service records did not contain the records relative to the incurrence of the shrapnel wound claimed by the applicant. A VA examination disclosed a 1 centimeter scar on his left forearm and a 1 centimeter scar on his left lower leg.
8. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier’s conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service. It provided for the wear of one bronze service star on the appropriate service medal for each credited campaign. It provided for award of the Purple Heart to any member of an Armed Force who was wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States. The wound must have required treatment by a medical officer and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 2d Battalion, 8th Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period October 1966 – 28 July 1969 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class, Unit Citation for the period 1 October 1966 – 31 October 1969.
10. The applicant's name is not on the Republic of Vietnam Casualty Roster. A search of the historical files of the 2d Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division were reviewed at the National Archives, College Park, MD. The review failed to identify the applicant as being eligible for award of the Purple Heart.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was wounded in action. Although the VA awarded the applicant service connection for residuals of shrapnel wounds to his left arm and left leg, the Rating Decision noted that the available service records did not contain the records relative to the incurrence of the shrapnel wound claimed by him. His name is not on the Republic of Vietnam Casualty Roster and a search of his unit's historical files failed to reveal he was eligible for award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence to show how he incurred the scars on his forearm and leg.
2. The applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 January 1966 – 14 January 1968. He met the eligibility criteria for award of two bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.
3. The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time that unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class, Unit Citation and so is eligible to wear these unit awards. There is no evidence to show he was assigned to a unit that was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 January 1966 – 14 January 1968.
2. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class, Unit Citation and to show he is authorized to wear two bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal.
3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE __ __ BJE _ __WDB __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Fred N. Eichorn _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002072439 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/10 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | PARTIAL RELIEF |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | 107.0056 |
| 3. | 107.0034 |
| 4. | 110.04 |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102680C070208
The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the era in which the applicant served the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. For Vietnam service, one OSB is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014749
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Presidential Unit Citation. He was wounded in Vietnam, but he did not receive a Purple Heart. His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documents that show he was wounded in action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002477C070206
A review of the available records which included the results of records searches conducted in 1970 and in 1995 of medical records, hospital/aid station admission and treatment records and unit morning reports fail to document that the applicant was treated for any of the injuries he asserts qualifies him for award of the Purple Heart. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 3...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008392C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 JUNE 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040008392 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to all members of the Armed Forces serving in Vietnam from 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014854
There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 22 November 1967; b. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 May 1966 through 3 May 1968; and c. adding the Purple Heart, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060063C070421
He states that he received the Purple Heart for the one wound that he received on 5 March, and for the wounds that he received on 30 April and 4 May, but not for the other two wounds. However, a clinical record cover sheet indicates that the applicant was wounded in the left leg and the left shoulder, that he was admitted to the 36 th on 7 March 1967 and returned to duty on 12 March 1967. The 24 October 1967 report of medical history shows that the applicant indicated that he received a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014638
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Air Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 November 1966...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430
No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064741C070421
Counsel also noted that the DVA rating decision granted service connection for shrapnel wounds to his shoulder and that the wounds are consistent with his history of being wounded in Vietnam. The rating decision states that the applicant’s service medical records were reviewed when his claim was considered and denied in 1989. The Board noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal or any unit awards.