| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Melinda M. Darby | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her uncharacterized discharge be changed to a hardship discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That she was supposed to receive a hardship discharge. She thought a hardship discharge was a chapter 6; however, she was told that since she did not finish her initial training she would be issued a chapter 11 under hardship. She contends that when she received her final set of papers to sign the reason stated entry level performance and conduct. She states that before she signed the papers she asked and was told that it was the same thing and that it would not make any difference. She further contends that she fractured her pelvic bone while in basic training and was in physical therapy when she was discharged; however, in order to continue her rehabilitation with the Veterans Administration (VA) she needs her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) corrected to show a hardship discharge. In support of her application, she submits a letter of explanation, dated 24 October 2001; a copy of her DD Form 214 and DA Form 4856-E (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 9 August 2001.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted on 12 April 2001 for a period of 4 years. While in advanced training, the applicant was counseled due to her inability to provide an adequate family care plan for her dependent child. DA Form 4856-E (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 9 August 2001, states, in pertinent part, “Initiation of Chapter 11 due to family hardship.” and “Separation action may be initiated if this type of behavior continues, under the provisions of AR [Army Regulation] 635-200 for the following: Entry Level Performance (Chapter 11), Unsatisfactory Performance (Chapter 13), Misconduct (Chapter 14) or Personality Disorder (Chapter 5).”
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records. However, her DD Form 214 shows that on
23 August 2001 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry level performance and conduct. She had served 4 months and 12 days of total active service.
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied for a hardship discharge.
On 27 February 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request that her narrative reason for separation be changed to hardship.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11 (Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct) of this regulation provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both) while in an entry level status. This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated inability, lack of reasonable effort or failure to adapt to the military environment. The regulation states that a soldier is in an entry level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The soldier’s service is uncharacterized when separated under this chapter.
Chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 governs separation because of dependency or hardship. The regulation provides that hardship exists when, in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of a soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship. Under this provision for hardship discharge, parenthood of married service women and sole parenthood are the two conditions under which separation may be granted.
Paragraph 6-3b(1) states that a married service woman may apply for separation under hardship when she becomes a parent by birth, adoption, or marriage (stepparent) and whose child (or children) under 18 years of age reside within the household. The regulation requires that the woman must submit evidence that the roles of parent and soldier are incompatible and that she cannot fulfill her military obligation without neglecting the child or children.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that she was supposed to receive a hardship discharge. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that she requested a hardship discharge.
2. DA Form 4856-E (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 9 August 2001, shows that the applicant’s separation was to be initiated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry level conduct and performance due to her inability to provide an adequate family care plan for her dependent child.
3. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations.
4. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation appear to be appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.
5. The Board also noted the applicant’s contention that she needs her DD Form 214 corrected to show a hardship discharge to allow her entitlement to VA benefits for medical care. However, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of obtaining medical benefits.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
INW____ MMD____ JTM_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065177 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020416 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 20010823 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, Chapter 11 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Entry level performance and conduct |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013889
On 13 November 1990, the applicant requested separation from the U.S. Army under paragraph 5-8, Army Regulation 635-200. On 14 December 1990, consistent with the recommendations of the applicant's chain of command, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for the inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood with an honorable characterization of service. Every case is individually decided based upon...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013182
In her self-authored statement, dated 13 August 2007, the applicant describes her difficulties adjusting to a predominantly male Army and describes occasions of sexual harassment she encountered during her military service. The applicant was neither married nor had any children during her military service. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064675C070421
Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Chapter 11 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel during the initial 180 days of service while still in an entry-level status. The available records show that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, due to entry-level performance and conduct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008405
On 5 December 1990, the applicant requested separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of hardship/parenthood. The "MDG" Separation code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200, Parenthood. The evidence of record shows that the applicant requested separation from the Army by reason of parenthood.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011114
On 27 June 2005, her commander notified her that action was being initiated to involuntarily separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) due to parenthood. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. As such, there is no evidence of an error in assignment of her reason for separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003780
The DA Form 4856 completed on that date shows his drill sergeant stated: PVT [Applicant], on 26 September 2007, you were counseled on the unfortunate death of your sister and the concern you had for your parents' emotional well being. His record is void of documentation showing he applied for a discharge due to hardship or dependency when he returned to duty after his convalescent leave and the death of his sister. The applicant should note that because he was in an entry-level status,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015855
The applicant states: * her net active service should be 15 months and 18 days (1 year, 3 months, and 18 days) * her Reserve service not on active duty was from 14 June 2001 to 11 September 2011 and from 16 May 2002 to 16 October 2003 * the separation authority should be changed to Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 6, due to hardship/parenthood (involuntary) * she was asked to reconsider detachment (deployment) to Kabul due to suffering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104930
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 6, paragraph 6-3b(1), AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of honorable. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(1), AR 635-200, by reason parenthood with a characterization of service of honorable. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008044
The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from sole parent to hardship. It appears that at the time of the applicant's separation, separation code MDG was entered item 26 to assist the Army with statistical data on Soldiers separating from the service by reason of sole parenthood. However, this separation code and narrative reason prohibits the applicant from receiving the...