Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064164C070421
Original file (2001064164C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 28 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064164

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:
1
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the Reenlistment (RE) Code on his report of separation (DD Form 214) be changed from RE-4 to RE-3.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he desires to reenter the military and since his discharge, the regulations and stipulations surrounding his type of discharge have changed. He further states that he made up a story of being bi-sexual simply to get out of the Army because he was being harassed by his platoon leader at the time and after repeated attempts to get away from him failed, he decided to take the measures he took.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted on 14 September 1982 for a period of 3 years and training as a tank turret repairman. He completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 27 April 1983. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 1 April 1984, and remained in Germany until 17 October 1984, when he was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

On 16 January 1985, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for disobeying a lawful order from a warrant officer and failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay and correctional custody for 7 days.

The applicant made a sworn statement to his commander on 5 February 1985 to the effect that he was bi-sexual, and that he had participated in sexual acts with persons of both sexes. He also indicated that he was aware that he had to be discharged because people with such feelings as his were not suitable for military service.

On 20 March 1985, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation based on a referral by his commander due to his having admitted to being bi-sexual and having engaged in sexual acts with members of the same sex. The applicant was psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by the command.

The applicant’s commander notified him on 26 March 1985 that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, for homosexuality. The applicant waived his right to consult with counsel and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

The commander initiated the separation action on 27 March 1985, and the appropriate authority approved the recommendation on 3 April 1985. He directed that the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

Accordingly, the applicant was honorably discharged on 8 April 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, for admission of homosexuality/bi-sexuality. He had served 2 years, 6 months and 25 days of total active service and was issued a RE Code of 4.

The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 27 June 1987 requesting that the narrative reason for his discharge and RE Code be changed. Although the ADRB does not have the authority to change an RE Code, they reviewed his case to determine if the narrative reason for his discharge was correct. The ADRB determined that he was properly discharged and unanimously voted to deny his case on 23 February 1988.

Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the USAR. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.

RE-4 indicates that a person is not qualified for continued Army service by virtue of being separated from the service with a non-waivable disqualification such as homosexuality, a Department of the Army imposed bar to reenlistment or commission of a serious offense.

Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, provides the policies and procedures for separating personnel for homosexuality. Paragraph 15-3b provides, in pertinent part, that a soldier will be separated under that chapter if the soldier has stated that he or she is a homosexual or is bi-sexual, unless there is a further finding that the soldier is not homosexual or bi-sexual. The regulation in effect at the time and presently in effect, provides that homosexuality seriously impairs the accomplishment of the military mission and is incompatible with military service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
3. The RE Code issued to the applicant at the time of his discharge was in accordance with the applicable regulations and the applicant has provided no evidence to show otherwise.

4. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, they are not supported by either the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board finds that his contentions are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief, given the circumstances of his case and his otherwise undistinguished record of service.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jm____ __rvo ___ ___cla___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064164
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/02/28
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300/RE CODE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018885

    Original file (20130018885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that effective 20 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026224

    Original file (20100026224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or reason for discharge. Paragraph 15-3b provides that a Soldier will be separated under that chapter if the Soldier has stated he or she is a homosexual or is bi-sexual unless there is a further finding that the Soldier is not homosexual or bi-sexual. Army Regulation 635-200 states a separation will be described as entry-level with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010481C070208

    Original file (20040010481C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the separation and directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality with issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. He completed 2 years and 11 months total active military service with no days of lost time. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration in 1993, when the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy came into effect;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089486C070403

    Original file (2003089486C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He states that he could not deal with his marital problems while in the Army and this affected his military duties. Paragraph 15-3b, provides for the separation of members based on an admission of homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014176

    Original file (20080014176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This paragraph also provides that only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his or her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9, provides, in pertinent part, that a separation will be described as an entry-level separation with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100736C070208

    Original file (04100736C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his 16 August 2000 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to RE "3" or "2" so that he can reenlist in the Army. On 8 August 2000 the separation authority approved the recommendation to discharge the applicant for homosexual conduct and directed that he be issued an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011370

    Original file (20140011370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She acknowledged her rights and willingly agreed to discuss the offense under investigation with a Criminal Investigation Command (CID) investigator. On 26 June 1985, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of chapter 15 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of homosexuality with the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, Subject: Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008474

    Original file (20130008474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010281

    Original file (20100010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 June 2007, be changed to an RE "3," "2" or "1" so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army. The commander stated in Part III (Summary of Counseling) that he was counseling the applicant on the definitions of "Bisexual," "Homosexual," "Sexual Orientation," and "Homosexual Conduct," which included a homosexual act, a statement of homosexuality, and/or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008940

    Original file (20120008940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 9 March 1990, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was recommending that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of paragraph 15-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel - Personnel Separations). The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards...