Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063892C070421
Original file (2001063892C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 9 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063892

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be issued a “20-year letter,” a letter of eligibility for Reserve retired pay at age 60.

APPLICANT STATES: That in 1986 his supervisor and others corrected his records and established that he had 181/2 years of qualifying service. He submits several miscellaneous service record documents in support of his application.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He served on active duty from 1966 through 1968, had a brief break in active duty in 1969, then reenlisted and served until 18 December 1972. There was a break in service from 19 December 1972 until 15 October 1976 when he affiliated with an Army Reserve (USAR) troop program unit (TPU) and completed a qualifying retirement year ending (RYE) 15 October 1977.

The applicant then had five consecutive non-qualifying years followed by qualifying years ending with his RYE date of 15 October 1983 through 1988.

As of his RYE date in 1986 he had only 10 years 10 months and 19 days qualifying service and only 17 years of service for pay computation purposes.

The applicant had only one more qualifying year, his RYE in 1991.

On 6 June 1998, he submitted a urine sample that tested positive for cocaine. He was separated with a general discharge due to misconduct, drug abuse on 1 April 1999.

The documents submitted by the applicant in support of his application include:

         • Army Reserve Retirement Point (record) Cards showing a qualifying RYE in 1977 and non-qualifying years in 1978, and 1980.

         • A TPU movement order annex indicating 12 days annual training in June 1992. The applicant’s name is included. There is no available evidence to show whether or not he actually participated.

         • 21 December 1990 orders for two TPU personnel to report for active duty of up to 180 days. (This period would have been included in the successful RYE in 1991.)

         • An Army Physical Fitness Test Score Card, bearing the applicant’s name and dated 29 April 1993.

         • The applicant’s DD Forms 214 (Report of release or Discharge from Active Duty) for enlistment ending in 1971 and 1972.

         • A correspondence course certificate dated 28 March 1986.

         • Certificates of achievement for the period from 5-18 July 1987 and
3-10 July 1988. (These periods are included in the qualifying RYEs in 1987 and 1988 noted above.)

         • A 25 May 1986 Academic Evaluation Report. (This period was included in the RYE 15 October 1986.)

         • A 31 January 1986 letter from the Army Reserve Personnel Center asking the applicant to complete forms for a security clearance background check. (RYE in 1987.)

         • Promotion orders dated 18 November 1986. (RYE in 1987.)

         • Promotion orders dated 15 January 1986. (RYE in 1986.)

         • An enlisted evaluation report dated for the period ending November 1972. (He was on active duty.)

         • An Army Physical Fitness Test Score Card, bearing the applicant’s name and dated 16 June 1991. (RYE in 1991)

         • A 9 April 1976 letter from a Department of Veterans Affairs official stating the applicant was scheduled to take a state Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) examination.

         • A letter of appreciation to a TPU commander for the applicant’s assistance with a surgical procedure on 13 November 1976. (RYE in 1977.)

         • Orders to annual training with a reporting date of 6 May 1996. The applicant was a member of the USAR Control Group (IMA). There is no available documentation to show whether or not he carried out these orders.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The available evidence, including the applicant’s submissions does not demonstrate that the applicant completed 20 years of qualifying service for Reserve retired pay at age 60.

2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO _ __RJW __ __DPH__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001063892
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020409
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084890C070212

    Original file (2003084890C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by revoking his transfer to the Retired Reserve, reinstating him to an active status and awarding him sufficient credit to permit him to qualify for retired pay at age 60. The Board notes that the DA Form 1380 provided by Mr. R_____ only shows 50 retirement points in column c. The Board is accepting this information as it is intended to be used, to establish participation and qualify the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011643

    Original file (20070011643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she would like a 15-year retirement letter because she is not able to actively participate in a unit of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) due to her medical condition. The applicant's military personnel records show she successfully completed 14 years of qualifying service in the USAR and ARNG from her initial enlistment on 10 July 1976 to her honorable discharge on 20 November 2000. Based on the provisions of law in effect at the time the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000651C070206

    Original file (20050000651C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he has 20 qualifying years of Army Reserve (USAR) service and is eligible for retired pay at age 60. Considering all the circumstances of the case, it is in the interest of justice to redistribute retirement points from another RY to make RYE 1987 a qualifying year and to provide the applicant with a 20 year letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020049

    Original file (20140020049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he terminated his service with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) because his new first sergeant was out to replace him with a friend. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A qualifying year is determined to be a year in which a minimum of 50 retirement points have been credited for a Reserve member.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010265

    Original file (20070010265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAHRC - STL Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 29 January 2008, shows the applicant completed 15 years and 13 days of qualifying service. However, evidence of record shows that he did not have 20 years of qualifying service at the time of his discharge from the USAR. Although the applicant had over 15 years of qualifying service when he was discharged from the USAR, there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence to show he was medically unfit while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069190C070402

    Original file (2002069190C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Revision of his retirement points and all records to reflect his continuous service in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from 23 August 1988 through 24 September 1990. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002945C070208

    Original file (20040002945C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had qualifying years (earned 50 or more retirement points a year) for a non-regular retirement up through retirement year ending (RYE) date 5 September 1986. Under this law, a Reserve soldier must complete a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60. Although the FSM completed his 15 years of qualifying service under this law by 1 October 1991, the law established the period of retirement as beginning on 23 October 1992, four years after his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089546C070403

    Original file (2003089546C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 28 April 1986, the date of his discharge. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088857C070212

    Original file (2003088857C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center letter dated 30 April 1985, the applicant was granted authority for his immediate reenlistment with an effective date of 22 April 1985. The evidence of record shows the applicant earned a qualifying year for a nonregular retirement during six of the seven RYEs he was assigned to the 2290th U. S. Army Hospital. The evidence of record shows there was some question concerning the number of retirement points the applicant earned during RYE 4 May 1976 (the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008542

    Original file (20060008542.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-regular retirement and that he be issued a 20-year letter. His discharge order from AR-PERCEN, St. Louis, shows reason as "Completed 20 or more Years Reserve Duty." In a 6 June 2006 letter from HRC-St. Louis, the applicant was informed that he was never issued a 20-year letter, only an order that incorrectly notified him that he had 20 years of service.