Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069190C070402
Original file (2002069190C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 1 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069190


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Antoinette Farley Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records.
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinions, if any).


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Revision of his retirement points and all records to reflect his continuous service in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from 23 August 1988 through 24 September 1990.

APPLICANT STATES: His current statement of retirement points does not show his creditable points or military service beyond 22 August 1988. In support of his claim he submits a copy for award of the Army Achievement Medal, a copy of his Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) from August 1989 to February 1990. He also submits several copies of his Leave and Earning Statements (LES) covering: 01-31 November 1988, 01-31 August 1989; 01-31 September 1989;
01-31 November 1989; 01-31 December 1989 and 01-31 January 1990, a copy of his 24 September 1990, USAR discharge orders and a copy of his transfer orders from the USAR Control Group to the 814th MP Company, dated 15 July 1989. He lists the date of discovery of the alleged error or injustice was 5 February 2002. He states that he is attempting to reenlist in the USAR and would like to be as close to retirement as possible.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD
: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 15 July 1969. He was trained as an Infantryman, served in the Republic of Vietnam and was released early to enroll in college. On 10 June 1971, he transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR).

On 23 August 1983, the applicant enlisted in the USAR, in pay grade E-5 and he was awarded the Army Achievement Medical with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster for the period of service from 1 March 1986 through December 1988 for meritorious services. On 24 September 1990, he was separated from the USAR with an honorable discharge.

On 21 March 2002, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command responded to the applicant's request for review of his records and the documents he provided. It verified that he was not entitled to any additional retirement points as shown in the summary of creditable retirement points and therefore took no action to correct his record. Between 23 August 1988 and 24 September 1990, the summary shows that he did not earn the required 50 points for each year.


SUMMARY OF CREDITABLE RETIREMENT POINTS FOR
FISCAL YRS
1969-1995


Begin
Date
End
Date
Creditable
Point
1969/07/15 1970/07/14 365
1970/07/15 1971/06/10 331
1971/06/11 1971/07/14 01
1971/07/15 1972/07/14 15
1972/07/15 1973/07/14 15
1973/07/15 1974/07/14 15
1974/07/15 1975/07/14 15
1975/07/15 1983/08/22 0
1983/08/23 1984/08/22 69
1984/08/23 1985/08/22 60
1985/08/23 1986/08/22 78
1986/08/23 1987/08/22 72
1987/08/23 1988/08/22 59
1988/08/23 1989/08/22 21
1989/08/23 1990/08/22 61
1990/08/23 1991/08/22 15
1991/08/23 1992/08/22 15
1992/08/23 1993/08/22 15
1993/08/23 1994/08/22 15
1994/08/23 1995/08/22 15
TOTAL 1252

The summary chart shows that he had several successful years of drilling (earning
50 points) from the Retirement Years ending (RYE) 74, 75, 83, 84, 85 and the FY86.

The LES submitted by the applicant shows that he participated in 5 drills (Unit Training Assemblies) in Fiscal Year 1989 (FY89) and 12 drills in FY90 (through January 1990). FY89 started 1 October 1988 FY90 on 1 October 1989. The NCOERs indicate highly successful performance but give no indication of the level of his participation in terms of drills or unit annual training attended.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. These reported drills are insufficient, in and of themselves, to change any of the currently "unsuccessful" years into creditable years (a minimum of 50 points).

2. The summary shows only 21 points for the RYE 22 August 1989. None of the FY89 and FY90 points documented by his LESs would have occurred in that RYE.

3. The reported total of 15 points for the RYE 22 August 1991 combined with 12
of the FY90 points documented by his LESs still equals only 27 points for the RYE.

4. Furthermore the NCOER’s he submitted gives no indication of the level of his participation.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___SAC ___MHM ___RKS _ DENY APPLICATION



Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records





INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069190
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002.08.01
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION Deny
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. A113.01
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009525

    Original file (20070009525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an Air Force Service History that shows he earned 15 retirement points (membership points only) in RYE 12 December 1988. Therefore, the certificate alone is insufficient evidence to show he should be granted active duty points for attendance at airborne training. At this time there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant earned 50 retirement points, or a qualifying year, in RYE 12 December 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069736C070402

    Original file (2002069736C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 1989 USAR Standby Advisory Board reviewed his record and selected him for promotion to MAJ. A 1989 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings directed that his discharge be voided, that he be promoted to MAJ, that he be credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement, and that an explanation be placed in his records to show that the resulting gap in Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs) was due to no fault of the officer. On 18 October 1988, ARPERCEN issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020049

    Original file (20140020049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he terminated his service with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) because his new first sergeant was out to replace him with a friend. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A qualifying year is determined to be a year in which a minimum of 50 retirement points have been credited for a Reserve member.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019593

    Original file (20140019593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests one point be transferred from any other year to provide him with 15 membership points for his retirement year ending (RYE) 23 April 1983. His AHRC Form 249-E prepared on 18 February 2014, shows he received 14 membership points for the period 29 May 1982 to 23 April 1983 (his RYE) date. The applicant provided no evidence to support correcting his membership points for RYE 23 April 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016102

    Original file (20090016102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated a review of the applicant's file determined that he completed 19 qualifying years of service as of his RYE 1995. Notwithstanding the recommendation by the advisory official, evidence of record shows that during RYEs 22 June 1987, 22 June 1990, and 22 June 1991, the applicant earned 34, 48, and 47 creditable retirement points, respectively, slightly shy of earning the minimum 50 points necessary to be credited with a qualifying year. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004386

    Original file (20120004386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 17 November 1984 to show: * her rank as sergeant (SGT) at the time of separation from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 97B (Counter Intelligence Agent) * she completed Drill Sergeant School * 179 days of active service with the 98th Division 2. She states her DD Form 214 is missing: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013778

    Original file (20080013778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay, Nonregular Service), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, states: a. a qualifying year for the purposes of qualifying for nonregular service retired pay is determined to be any year in which a service member earns a minimum of 50 retirement points; b. to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have: (1) attained age 60, (2) completed a minimum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015704

    Original file (20100015704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a copy of the following documentation in support of his request: * Letter Orders (LO) Number 12-27, Headquarters (HQ), First United States Army, dated 28 December 1973 * A HQ Fort Lewis (HFL) Form 1329 (Statement of Understanding), dated 17 January 1974 * Special Orders (SO) Number 207 (Extract), HQ, 9th Infantry Division and Fort Lewis, dated 26 July 1974 * A DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 August 1974 * SO Number 37, Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016962

    Original file (20070016962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides page 1 of his 19 June 1981 enlistment contract; his honorable discharge certificate, dated 26 April 1989; and a Statement of Retirement Points, dated 29 October 2007. At this time, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.