| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable and that he be given a Reentry (RE) Code that will allow him the option to enlist again.
APPLICANT STATES: That he is entitled to an honorable discharge and the option to enlist again because at the time he went absent without leave (AWOL), his commander forbade him to act in the best interest of his family. He further states that his wife needed transportation to go to the doctor during a high-risk pregnancy and he was ordered to leave her without transportation for a period of 33 days. He goes on to state that he went AWOL to care for his unborn son.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) on 12 February 1996, and served with the ALARNG until he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 May 1997, for a period of 3 years and training as a unit supply specialist. His records indicate that he was 20 years of age and single when he enlisted.
He completed his advanced individual training at Fort Lee, Virginia and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, where he updated his record of emergency data and indicated that he was still single on 1 August 1997.
On 3 August 1998, he went AWOL and remained absent until he was returned to military control on 28 August 1998, and charges were preferred against him.
On 13 October 1998, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request, he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him, or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 26 October 1998, and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 3 November 1998, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 year, 4 months and 10 days of active service during his current enlistment and had 25 days of lost time due to AWOL.
The applicant appealed to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge to a general discharge on 4 October 2001. He provided no explanation with his appeal and the ADRB, after reviewing the facts and circumstances of his case, determined that he had been properly discharged and that his service was properly characterized. The ADRB denied his appeal on 14 December 2001.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate and there was not then, nor is there now, any provisions for an automatic upgrade of such a discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absence as well as his otherwise undistinguished record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jm___ __rvo ___ __cla____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062806 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/28 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1998/11/03 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003130C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030423
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the pay grade of E-3 and that he was not court-martialed and that he be paid all back pay and allowances due him. The applicants DD Form 214 also properly reflects that he was reduced to the pay...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019486
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be changed to an uncharacterized character of service. He was AWOL for more than 60 days and the separation authority determined that his misconduct warranted a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011664
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky, where charges were preferred against him on 30 June 1994 for being AWOL from 9 March 1993 to 27 June 1994 (475 days).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017721
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. On 7 August 2002, the appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002038
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge and that he be restored to the pay grade of E-4. On 15 December 1989, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 28 March 1990, the appropriate authority...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076078C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 January 2001, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The documents submitted by the applicant with her application date back to 1997 and go through the period of her discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065840C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or medical discharge. He again went AWOL on 28 July 1975 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Hood on 22 August 1975, where charges were again preferred against him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008916
On 19 August 1986, court-martial charges were preferred against him for the above period of AWOL. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood by requesting a discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004156
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. On 20 January 1998, the appropriate authority approved his request for discharge and directed he be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.