| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge be voided and that he be granted a 15-year retirement.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was unjustly denied a 15-year retirement by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) when they erroneously determined that he did not meet the eligibility requirements and that the target reduction number had been met. He goes on to state that he met the requirements and applied in sufficient time to have his request approved. He continues by stating that even after his request was denied, the Army continued to experience an overage of his military occupational specialty (MOS) and yet the Army did not consider him for the 15-year retirement. He also states that after the PERSCOM denied his request, he was selected for separation under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). However, had the PERSCOM properly considered his request, he would never have been selected under the QMP. In support of his application he submits a copy of the “TRANS-O-GRAM” he received from the PERSCOM, a copy of his request for early retirement and a copy of the responses his congressional representative received from the PERSCOM and the Office of the Chief of Legislative Liaison (OCLL) regarding his request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 July 1978 and served until he was honorably discharged on his scheduled expiration of term of service (ETS) on 22 July 1981. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 28 days of total active Federal service (AFS).
He again enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 October 1982 for a period of 3 years. His basic active service date (BASD) was established as 3 October 1980 and he remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 February 1994.
On 7 November 1994, the PERSCOM sent the applicant a “TRANS-O-GRAM” notifying him that his MOS and grade were, in effect, over-strength, and that he was eligible to apply under the Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 Early Retirement and Early Release Program. It also informed him that his request would have to be received at the PERSCOM no later than 31 December 1994, that not all applications would be approved and that only six of 300 would be approved.
The applicant initiated his application on 30 November 1994; however, the available records fail to show when it was processed through to PERSCOM.
On 10 October 1995, the applicant was notified that the Calendar Year 1995 Sergeant First Class/Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course Promotion/Selection Board had determined that he should be barred from reenlistment under the QMP based on the presence of three noncommissioned officer evaluation reports indicating deficiencies/weaknesses in performance, efficiency and discipline and two Records of Nonjudicial Punishment (DA Form 2627) contained in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
The applicant elected to submit an appeal and his commander elected to submit an appeal on behalf of the applicant as well. The battalion commander initiated an appeal on behalf of the applicant on 16 November 1995 and it was supported by the brigade commander as well. However; the commanding general did not support the recommendation. A Department of the Army Standby Advisory Board (STAB) reviewed the appeal and denied it. The STAB directed that he be discharged no later than 31 July 1996.
Meanwhile, on 4 April 1996, in response to a congressional inquiry on behalf of the applicant, the PERSCOM informed the congressional representative that the Early Retirement Program was offered only to those personnel in the pay grade of E-6 who had completed 15 years of AFS as of 30 June 1995 and that the applicant was not eligible. It further informed the representative that the applicant had been barred from reenlistment under the QMP and was ineligible for early retirement. In May 1996, the OCLL also responded to the same congressional representative and provided essentially the same information.
The applicant requested that he be granted an extension until 31 August 1996, in order to properly clear and receive a separation physical. He was granted an exception to policy on 19 July 1996.
Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 28 August 1996, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, due to reduction in force. He had served 16 years, 10 months and 26 days of total active service and received one-half separation pay in the amount of $20,003.66.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. By the applicant’s own admission, the PERSCOM informed him that the target number of applications for his grade and MOS had been met by the time his request was processed at the PERSCOM. Inasmuch as the initial notification “TRANS-O-GRAM” informed him that not all applications would be approved and that only 6 eligible applicants of 300 potential applicants was the target, it was imperative that applicants expedite their request.
3. The applicant’s contention that he was eligible and that the PERSCOM unjustly denied his request appears to be without merit. The applicant’s BASD was 3 October 1980. Therefore, he could not have the required 15 years of service as of 30 June 1995, which was a prerequisite of the program. The applicant did not have 15 years of AFS until 2 October 1995.
4. Accordingly, the Board finds that he was properly discharged in accordance with the applicable regulations, with no violations of any of the applicant’s rights.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rks ___ ____rvo _ ___eja___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062723 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/31 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1996/08/28 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, para 16-8 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 343 | 136.0500/15 YR RET |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011796
During the initial active force drawdown period (23 October 1992 and ending on 1 October 1999), the Secretary of the Army could authorize an enlisted member with at least 15 but less than 20 years of creditable service a length of service retirement. The August 1995 message implementing the FY96 Regular Army Enlisted Early Retirement Program did not list eligible MOSs; PERSCOM determined which applications would be approved based upon force structure and the best interest of the Army. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605718C070209
That message stated that the window for category 3 personnel would be open from 16 May through 31 August 1994. The applicants contention that the Army filled its quota of soldiers with the applicants grade and MOS who would receive SSB prior to the scheduled expiration date of the window of consideration is supported by the evidence of record. It is noted that the PERSCOM received the applicants request for voluntary early release over a month after the closing date for his category of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058405C070421
On 3 December 1998, the soldier submitted a DA Form 4187 requesting retirement on 1 September 1999, which reflects that he intended to retire with 22 years of AFS. The opinion further states that the applicant was aware for over 4 months before retirement that he would not have 22 years of AFS at his requested retirement date, and while soldiers are authorized to request change or withdrawal of an approved retirement, there is no evidence that the applicant requested to change or withdraw...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199705848
A review of the records reveals that the applicant’s rater indicated on his EER for the period covering December 1986 through November 1987, that he failed in his demonstrated performance of present duty. On his NCOER for the period covering August 1993 through March 1994, his rater indicated that he failed to maintain a high standard of personal conduct on and off duty. Paragraph 16-8 provides that personnel will be notified of the separation by appropriate commanders and be provided the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199705848C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: Removal of his Department of the Army (DA) imposed bar to reenlistment by deleting the word failure of the physical fitness testing scores in the Enlisted Evaluation Reports (EERs) for the periods covering December 1986 through November 1987 and June 1988 through May 1989. On his NCOER for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078028C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was unjustly denied promotion consideration to the pay grade of E-7 by the 1991 Sergeant First Class (SFC) Promotion Selection Board because his bar to reenlistment was not removed from his records by the time the selection board convened. His counsel contends, in effect, that because the applicant was not considered by the 1991 SFC Promotion Selection Board, he was unjustly denied subsequent promotions to the pay grades of E-8 and E-9, which has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004308C071029
On 24 October 1993, the applicant was charged with assaulting his wife. He told her he needed to call an ambulance to get her to the hospital [where she was eventually treated for nine days]. The Manual for Courts-Martial United States, Part II, Rule 401 (Forwarding and disposition of charges in general) states only persons authorized to convene courts-martial or to administer nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 may dispose of charges.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085330C070212
Counsel states that the applicant was unlawfully non-selected for promotion to LTC by two Standby Advisory Boards (STAB) convening in December 2000 and May 2001 under 1998 and 1999 criteria, when the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) failed to properly expunge derogatory documents from his official military personnel file (OMPF) microfiche. The applicant appealed to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 1 August 1995 to be retained on active duty as an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058334C070421
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to withdraw his request for retirement under the Voluntary Early Retirement Program (VERP) and was forced to retire against his wishes. Meanwhile, it appears, based on the documents submitted by the applicant, that he submitted a request to withdraw his application for retirement on 9 January 1996. Although the applicant contended that he (his wife) had an unforeseen medical condition, the applicant has failed to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005821C070206
In January 1997, he filed an appeal with the ESRB to have the two contested NCOERs removed. However, although the applicant performed duties as a First Sergeant, he was a recruiter. Correction of the applicant's contested NCOERs to show they were relief- for-cause NCOERs rather than change-of-rater NCOERs would not have resulted in a reasonable chance he would have been selected for promotion (thereby warranting consideration by a STAB).