Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605718C070209
Original file (9605718C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That it be shown that his application for voluntary early release, with Special Separation Benefit (SSB), was approved.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he was denied the SSB due to the premature closing of the SSB application window.  The message announcing the SSB specifically stated that the window for applications would remain open until 31 August 1994.  In addition, the message stated that selections would be made on the applications based on seniority.  If the window was prematurely closed, seniority could not be determined.

In support of his application he submits a copy of a message from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  That message stated that the window for category 3 personnel would be open from 16 May through 31 August 1994.  Category 3 personnel were defined by the message as individuals who held certain grades and military occupational specialties and who had a basic active service date (BASD) of 30 September 1986 or earlier.  That message continued that eligibility to apply for SSB did not constitute an entitlement or guarantee of approval.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 October 1987 with 2 years, 11 months and 7 days prior active service, and was honorably released from active duty and transferred to an ARNG unit at the expiration of his term of service on 14 May 1995.

In a response to a congressional inquiry, the PERSCOM stated that they received an application for voluntary early release from the applicant on 4 October 1994.  However, his MOS had been removed from SSB consideration on 27 June 1994 as that MOS had by then been reduced to the level that had been targeted by the Army.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1.  The Army had reduced its strength for the applicant’s MOS and grade to its desired level prior to his application being received at the PERSCOM.  As such, he could not have been considered for voluntary early release with SSB.

2.  The applicant’s contention that the Army filled its quota of soldier’s with the applicant’s grade and MOS who would receive SSB prior to the scheduled expiration date of the window of consideration is supported by the evidence of record.  However, the PERSCOM message announcing the “buyouts” specifically stated that eligibility to apply for SSB did not constitute an entitlement or guarantee of approval.  In other words, a soldier had no right to an SSB, it was not an entitlement.

3.  It is noted that the PERSCOM received the applicant’s request for voluntary early release over a month after the closing date for his category of consideration.  As such, his contention that the program was terminated early is not relevant.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009778

    Original file (20090009778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program with entitlement to the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI)/Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant submitted the following documentary evidence in support of his request: a. a DA Form 4187, dated 26 February 1992, in which he requested voluntary separation under the provisions of Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 92-85. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010493

    Original file (20140010493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he was retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) instead of discharged under the Early Release Program – Special Separation Benefit (SSB). Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 93-164, dated 20 April 1993, prescribed eligibility requirements and application procedures for early retirement for Regular Army Soldiers. The May 1994 PERSCOM message implementing the Fiscal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508337C070209

    Original file (9508337C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    .It indicated that a soldier could qualify for SSB if he/she (1) had served on active duty for more than 6 years prior to 5 December 1991, but had served less than 20 years at the time of separation, and was not eligible for retirement or retainer pay based on military service; (2) had served at least 5 years of continuous active duty immediately preceding the date of separation; (3) had completed initial period of enlistment; (4) was a member of the Regular Army or USAR soldiers on extended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510341C070209

    Original file (9510341C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel message dated 20 December 1991 that originally announced the VSIP to support the Army drawdown, stated, in pertinent part, that soldiers in the pay grade of E-4 (promotable) and below with more than 7 years of service as of 31 December 1991 could apply for separation under the VSIP during the period 1 January 1992 through 29 February 1992. The 20 December 1991 message also set forth the specific criteria for VSIP eligibility and provided the authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508626C070209

    Original file (9508626C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that his application was denied because he had 15 years and 8 months of active service which was more than was permitted for entry into the program. In letters of 9, 17 and 19 January 1995 the Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR) advised the applicant that he was not eligible for entry into the program based on a calculation of his active federal service (AFS) which determined that he actually had completed 15 years, 8 months of AFS (instead of the 14 years, 2 months and 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507096C070209

    Original file (9507096C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show after serving 9 years, 3 months, and 2 days of total active service, he reenlisted on 25 November 1985 for a period of 6 years, while serving in the pay grade of E-7. It further opined that the applicant was authorized full separation pay based on his involuntary separation and recommended that his request be denied. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected: a. by showing that the individual concerned was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605716C070209

    Original file (9605716C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military record be corrected to reflect separation under the Early Retirement Program versus separation with the Special Separation Bonus (SSB). The evidence of record shows that the applicant, who was not facing any involuntary separation action, elected to participate in a voluntary early transition program which paid him more than $57,000 in separation pay. Had he not voluntarily participated in the SSB program and remained on active duty he would not have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606815C070209

    Original file (9606815C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: That at the time he requested separation under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP), he also requested a waiver of recoupment of any funds he still owed (in lieu of completing his active duty service obligation (ADSO)) for having participated in an ACS program. He specified in his request that he did not desire to separate from the service if his request for the VSI was not approved. Although, the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506342C070209

    Original file (9506342C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted on 5 November 1984 for a period of 3 years. Although not explained in the available records, orders were published on 25 June 1991 which authorized the applicant to separate from the service prior to his ETS, on 28 November 1991, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, and considering that there were no early release programs announced at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006745

    Original file (20090006745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 January 1992, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the Fiscal Year (FY) 1992 Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program, effective 25 April 1992, under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option. It provided, in pertinent part, that non-disability separation pay was authorized for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers involuntarily separated or released from active duty who were discharged under honorable conditions and who had completed at least 6 years, but...