| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Member | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was unjustly discharged while in basic training. He further states that shortly after going to basic training, he received word from his wife that she and his child were being evicted for not paying the rent. He goes on to state that he requested a week off in order to take care of his family and was denied any time off by the commander. He continues by stating that his commander gave him a lot of undesirable details in an attempt to make him go absent without leave (AWOL). He also states that he went AWOL and after he was caught, he was placed in the post stockade and was subsequently discharged.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the United States Army Reserve under the delayed entry program on 28 February 1975. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 May 1975 for a period of 3 years, training as a field artilleryman, and assignment to Fort Sill, Oklahoma.
He was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri to undergo his basic training. On 6 June 1975, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and correctional custody for 7 days. At the time punishment was imposed, the applicant was informed in writing of the rules regarding his presence and conduct while in correctional custody. He was also informed that the maximum punishment he could receive for escape from correctional custody was a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, or confinement at hard labor for 1 year.
On 11 June 1975, court-martial charges were preferred against him for escaping from correctional custody on 8 June 1975. After consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service on 19 June 1975, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him, or of lesser-included offenses, which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 10 July 1975 and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 10 July 1975, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 months and 11 days of total active service.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted by the Board. However, the Board notes that after being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___kak__ ___ra___ ___jh ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062623 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/05 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1975/07/10 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083076C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070603C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014911
This lawyer was also informed that the applicant desired to submit a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). In his request for discharge, the applicant also acknowledged that he understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065840C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or medical discharge. He again went AWOL on 28 July 1975 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Hood on 22 August 1975, where charges were again preferred against him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022752
The applicant states he was incarcerated in Vietnam and was seen by counsel who advised him to request a chapter 10 discharge. On 15 January 1975, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge and determined his discharge was both proper and equitable. At the time, he understood Soldiers who sought help for their drug problems would receive amnesty and was surprised to learn the applicant received a less than honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064347C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or honorable discharge. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065190C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071401C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. However, he was 25 years of age at the time of his enlistment and was old enough to be responsible for his actions at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064363C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023069
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 11 June 1975 after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of...